Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to indicate the parameters uncertainty in most of the proposed analytical oxidation models [1]–[6]. At first, the ε -indifference range, i.e. EquationSource% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaagCart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn % hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr % 4rNCHbWexLMBbXgBd9gzLbvyNv2CaeHbl7mZLdGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqr % pepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs % 0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-xfr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaai % aabeqaamaabaabauaakeaadaabdaqaaiaadkfadaqadaqaamaanaaa % baGaeqiUdehaaaGaayjkaiaawMcaaiabgkHiTiaadkfadaqadaqaam % aanaaabaGaeqiUdehaaiaacQcaaiaawIcacaGLPaaaaiaawEa7caGL % iWoacqGHKjYOcqaH1oqzaaa!4F86!]]</EquationSource><EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[$$\left| {R\left( {\overline \theta } \right) - R\left( {\overline \theta *} \right)} \right| \leqslant \varepsilon $$ is defined. Then the determination of the parameters uncertainty is converted into the determination of ε -indifference range. The methods are introduced to determine this ε -indifference range, and afterwards also the parameter uncertainty. The correlation matrices of the paramet ers for each model are given in this paper. The results of this paper show that most of the analytical oxidation model’s parameters are interdependent within a widely used data fitting and parameter extraction range. Most of the extracted parameters for these proposed oxidation models [1]–[6] show a quite large uncertainty. Therefore, some physical mechanisms of oxidation which were concluded from or proven by the data fitting only could be questioned and debated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B.E.Deal and A.S.Grove, J.Appl.Phys. 3¢, 3770(1965).
A.Fargeix and G.Ghibaudo, J.Appl.Phys., 54(12) 7153(1983).
H.Z.Massoud, J.D.Plummer and E.A.Irene J.Electrochem. Soc. 132 1745(1985).
Y.Z.Lu and Y.C.Cheng, J.Appl.Phys., 56(6) 1608(1986).
A.G.Revesz, B.J.Mrstik, H.L.Hugher, and D.McCarthy, J.Electrochem. Soc. 133, 586(1986).
C.J.Han and C.R.Helms, J.Electrochem. Soc. 134, 1297(1987).
Z.M.Ling, L.Dupas and K.DeMeyer, this conference
Y.Bard, “Nonlinear Parameter Estimation”, New York and London, 1974.
H.Z.Massoud and J.D.Plummer, J.Appl.Phys., 62(8) 3416(1987).
W.Maes, K.M.DeMeyer and L.H.Dupas, IEEE Trans. on CAD, CAD-5(2) 320,(1986).
E.A.Irene and Y.J.vanderMeulen, J.Electrochem.Soc. 123 1380(1976).
B.J.Mrstik, A.G.Revesz, M.Ancona and H.L.Hughes, J.Electrochem.Soc. 134, 2020 (1987).
M.A.Hopper, R.A.Clarke, and L.Young, ibid, 122, 1216 (1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ling, ZM., Dupas, L.H., De Meyer, K.M. (1988). Uncertainty Analysis of Analytic Oxidation Models. In: Helms, C.R., Deal, B.E. (eds) The Physics and Chemistry of SiO2 and the Si-SiO2 Interface. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0774-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0774-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0776-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0774-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive