Abstract
We asked a number of colleagues to comment on the difficulties involved in moving the exam issue from the realm of innovation to that of systemic change. Following are comments by Herbert Lin, Mary Nakhleh, Susan Nurrenbern, and Arthur Ellis
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. J. Osborne and M. C. Witrock, “Learning Science: A Generative Process,” Science in Education, 67, (1983): 489–508;.
von Glasersfeld, “Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position,” in F. Steier, Ed., Research and Reflexivity (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991).
S. Kemmis and R. McTaggart, The Action Research Planner, 3rd ed. (Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press, 1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tobias, S., Raphael, J. (1997). Introduction: From Innovation to Change. In: The Hidden Curriculum—Faculty-Made Tests in Science. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0482-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0482-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45581-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0482-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive