Skip to main content
  • 389 Accesses

Abstract

Previous chapters show that it is possible to model important factors that enter into an ultrasonic NDE measurement setup. These ultrasonic measurement models (and similar models being developed for other techniques, such as eddy currents and x-rays1 form the basis for a new quantitative NDE technology where entire NDE tests can be simulated and test parameters (including those associated with flaws) can be manipulated for engineering design and analysis. This new technology has a number of important practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. N. Gray, T. A. Gray, N. Nakagawa, and R. B. Thompson, Models for predicting NDE reliability, in Metals Handbook, vol. 17, 9th ed., Nondestructive Evaluation and Quality Control (ASM International, Materials Park, Oh., 1989), pp. 702–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Krautkramer, British J. Appl. Phys. 10 (1959) 240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. C. Olivers, L. Bosselaar, and P. R. Filmore, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68 (1980) 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Lerch, L. W. Schmerr, and A. Sedov, Res. Nondestr. Eval. 8 (1996) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. W. Schmerr, S. J. Song, and H. Zhang, Model-based calibration of ultrasonic system responses for quantitative measurements, in Nondestructive Characterization of Materials, VI, (R. E. Green, Jr., K. J. Kozaczek, and C. O. Ruud, eds.) (Plenum, New York, (1994) pp. 111–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Abramowitz, and I. A. Segun, eds., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, (Dover, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Jeffrey, Handbook of Mathematical Formulas and Integrals (Academic, San Diego, CA., 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Sedov, L. W. Schmerr, and S. J. Song, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92 (1992) 478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. J. Song, L. W. Schmerr, and A. Sedov, Res. Nondestr. Eval. 3 (1991) 201.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Aindow, A. Markiewicz, and R. C. Chivers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78 (1985) 1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. L. Madsen, M. M. Goodsitt, and J. A. Zagzebski, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70 (1981) 1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. M. Goodsitt, E. L. Madsen, and J. A. Zagzebski, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71 (1982) 318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. W. N. Cobb, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75 (1984) 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Adach, and R. C. Chivers, Acustica 62 (1986) 66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Adach, and R. C. Chivers, Acustica 70 (1990) 12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Adach, and R. C. Chivers, Acustica 70 (1990) 135.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Amin, T. A. Gray, and F. J. Margetan, A new method to estimate the effective geometrical focal length and radius of ultrasonic focused probes, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1991), 10A, pp. 861–65.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. A. Gray, Model-based characterization of planar and focused immersion ultrasonic transducers, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1995), 14A, pp. 1021–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Sedov, L. W. Schmerr, and S. J. Song, Ultrasonic scattering models for standards: flat-bottom holes and spherical reflectors, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1991), 10A, pp. 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.W. Schmerr and A. Sedov, A near-field measurement model for ultrasonic reference standards, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1991), 11 A, pp. 1191–98.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. A. Gray, R. B. Thompson, and B. P. Newberry, Model-based ultrasonic NDE system qualification methodology, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1987), 6A, pp. 93–100.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. T. A. Gray, F. Amin, and R. B. Thompson, Application of ultrasonic POD models, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1988), 7B, pp. 1737–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. D. D. Bennink, and A. L. Pate, Investigation of scatter in ultrasonic responses caused by variability in transducer and material properties, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation C D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1988), 7A, pp. 621–28.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Utrata, and T. A. Gray, Use of ultrasonic modeling in the inspection of railway axles, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1991), 10A, pp. 621–28.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. A. Gray, Ultrasonic measurement model for contact transducers on curved surfaces, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1994), 13B, pp. 2191–98.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. D. Achenbach, and D. E. Budreck, 3-D modeling of ultrasonic scattering from intergranular stress corrosion cracks, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1987), 6A, pp. 87–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. T. A. Gray, R. B. Thompson, and B. P. Newberry, Applications of models for IGSCC inspection, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1987), 6A, pp. 93–100.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. F. J. Margetan, T. A. Gray, R. B. Thompson, and B. P. Newberry, A model for ultrasound transmission through graphite composite plates containing delaminations, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1988), 7B, pp. 1083–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. D. D. Bennink, and A. L. Pate, Reciprocity-based measurement models for ultrasonic NDE, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1989), 8A, pp. 843–48.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. D. Bennink, and A. L. Pate, Ultrasonic transducer calibration for reciprocity-based methods, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1989), 8A, pp. 849–56.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. S. Cheng, Ultrasonic reflection by a planar distribution of surface-breaking cracks, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1995), 14A, pp. 59–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Temple, UK development in theoretical modeling for NDT, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1987), 6A, pp. 21–35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Lhemery, Impulse-response method to predict echo-responses from defects in solids: a first approach, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1995), 14A, pp. 115–122.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. R. Marklein, R. Barmann, and K. J. Langenberg, Ultrasonic modeling code EFIT as applied to inhomogeneous dissipative isotropic and anisotropic media, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1995), 14, pp. 251–258.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. T. A. Gray, The CAD/NDE interface—designing for inspectability, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1990), 9A, pp. 877–884.

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. W. Schmerr, and D. O. Thompson, NDE and design—a unified life-cycle engineering approach, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1993), 12B, pp. 2325–2331.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. L. W. Schmerr, and D. O. Thompson, NDE models and design—a unified life-cycle engineering approach, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1994), 13B, pp. 2183–2190.

    Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading

  • L. W. Schmerr, and A. Sedov, Res. Nondestr. Eval. 1 (1989) 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. W. Schmerr, T. P. Lerch, and A. Sedov, A focused transducer/scatterer model for ultrasonic reference standards, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1993), 12A, pp. 925–931.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmerr, L.W. (1998). Quantitative Ultrasonic NDE with Models. In: Fundamentals of Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0142-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0142-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0144-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0142-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics