Skip to main content
  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explicate the concept’ system’ as a working tool for the practice of analytical philosophy. System is defined as a mode of description, as a description of a conceptual holism. Some of the implications of this are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Checkland, P., 1981, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., 1989, Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis, in: “Rational Analysis for a Problematic World”, J Rosenhead, ed., J Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H., 1972, Tarski’s theory of truth, Journal of Philosophy, 69:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S., 1980, “Is There a Text in This Class?”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D., 1748, “Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding”, L.A. Selby-Bigge, and Rev. P.H. Nidditch, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G.J., 1969, “An Approach to General Systems Theory”, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1973, “Counterfactuals”, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1986, “On the Plurality of Worlds”, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., 1994, Five sketches of post-modernism: Implications for systems thinking and operational research, Systemist 16:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G., 1984, “Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories”, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C., 1992, “A Study of Concepts”, Bradford Books, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O., 1953, Two dogmas of empiricism, in: “From a Logical Point of View”, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G., 1949, “The Concept of Mind”, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, J.C., 1926, “Holism and Evolution”, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A., 1944, The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, N., 1987, “Anti-Realism and Logic”, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, A., 1985, Against holism, Philosophical Quarterly 35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cameron, B. (1995). Systems for Philosophy. In: Ellis, K., Gregory, A., Mears-Young, B.R., Ragsdell, G. (eds) Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9883-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9883-8_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9885-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9883-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics