Skip to main content

Division of Labor and Morphological Response

Evidence from Saudi Arabia

  • Chapter
  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

An important criterion for evaluating scientific fields of inquiry is credibility of their theoretical explanations of empirical phenomena regardless of location or time of observation of these phenomena. A criticism of sociological human ecology, as well as sociology in general, is the circumscription of its research to American society (Guest 1984; Frisbie 1984; London 1987). Without doubt, the utility of human ecological (or any) theory depends upon its capability to inform and guide analyses in a wide range of national, cultural, and temporal settings. Hawley’s classic commentary (1950:Chapter 11, 1968, 1986) on differentiation and organizational structure constitutes a theoretical framework that appears sufficiently general to serve as a guide for research on societies representing a wide range of social conditions. The purpose of our analysis in this chapter is to examine the power of Hawley’s theoretical model to account for variation in the degree of the division of labor and morphological growth of social systems. Both of these factors are central elements in ecology’s universe of inquiry. We have chosen to apply Hawley’s theory to the study of Saudi Arabia. Besides its international prominence and the high geopolitical interest in the country that recent world events has generated, Saudi Arabia represents a crucial test of the generalizability of ecological theory. In many respects, Saudi society is so substantially different from American society that it seems unlikely that patterns found in the United States would emerge in this Middle Eastern nation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akers, Ronald, and Campbell, Frederick L. (1970). Size and administrative component in occupational association. Pacific Sociological Review, 13, 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khalifah, Abdullah H. M. (1985). Ecological expansion in Saudi Arabia: A case stuck in socioeconomic development. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Austin, TX: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Theodore R., and Warkov, Seymour. (1961). Organizational size and functional complexity: A study of administration in hospitals. American Sociological Review, 26, 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Reinhard. (1956). Work and authority in industry. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birks, J. S., and Sinclair, C. A. (1979). The international migration project: An inquiry into the Middle East labor market. International Migration Review, 13, 122–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks, J. S., and Sinclair, C. A. (1980). International migration and development in the Arab region. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organization. American Sociological Review, 35, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter, and Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations. San Francisco, CA: Chandler. Boulding, Kenneth E. (1953). Toward a general theory of growth. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 19, 326–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, Harley, and Gibbs, Jack P. (1971). Intraindustry division of labor: The states of Mexico. Demography, 8, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Department of Statistics (Saudi Arabia). (1982). Statistical yearbooks. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Middle East Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemente, Frank, and Sturgis, Richard B. (1972). The division of labor in America: An Ecological Analysis. Social Forces, 51, 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E. (1952). Planning and developing the company organization structure. American Management Association, 2, 66–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1 893] (1933). The division of labor in society. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberstein, Isaac W., and Frisbie, W. Parker. (1982). Metropolitan function and interdependence in the U.S. urban system. Social Forces, 60, 676–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Mallakh, Ragaei. (1982). Saudi Arabia: Rush to development. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, Doris. (1961). Observations on the span of control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 551–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Adam. [ 1819 ] (1966). Essay on the history of civil society. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W. Parker. (1984). Data and methods in human ecology. In Michael Micklin and Harvey M. Choldin (Eds.), Sociological human ecology: Contemporary issues and applications (pp. 125–125 ). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W. Parker, and Poston, Jr., Dudley L. (1978). Sustenance differentiation and population redistribution. Social Forces, 57, 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Jack P., and Browning, Harley L. (1966). The division of labor, technology, and the organization of production in twelve countries. American Sociological Review, 31, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Jack P., and Martin, Walter T. (1962). Urbanization, technology, and division of labor: International patterns. American Sociological Review, 27, 667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Jack P., and Poston, Jr., Dudley L. (1975). The division of labor: conceptualization and related measures. Social Forces, 53, 468–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, Avery M. (1984). The city. In Michael Micklin and Harvey M. Choldin (Eds.), Sociological human ecology (pp. 277–277 ). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Eugene. (1963). The size of the supportive component in organizations: A multiorganizational analysis. Social Forces, 42, 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haire, Mason. (1959). Modern organization theory. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Richard, Haas, J. Eugene, and Johnsons, Norman J. (1967). Organization size, complexity, and formalization. American Sociological Review, 32, 903–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, Amos H. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structure. New York: Ronald Press. Hawley, Amos H. (1968). Human ecology. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 323–323 ). New York: Crowell, Collier, and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, Amos H. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hawley, Amos H., Boland, Walter, and Boland, Margaret. (1965). Population size and administration in institutions of higher education. American Sociological Review, 30, 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot, Gerry E., and James, Thomas F. (1972). Size and growth as determinants of administrative production ratios in organization. American Sociological Review, 37, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, Edward A., and Blowers, Thomas A. (1971). Administrative ratios and organization size: A longitudinal examination. American Sociological Review, 36, 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, Saad E. (1982). The new Arab social order: A study of the social impact of oil wealth. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indik, B. (1964). The relationship between organization size and supervision. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, T. F. (1972). The administrative component in complex organization. The Sociological Quarterly, 13, 553–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, John D. (1974). The structural implications of social system size: A three-level analysis. American Sociological Review, 39, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, John D., and Nolan, Patrick. (1979). Ratio measurement and theoretical inference in social research. Social Forces, 58, 212–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, Sheila R. (1970). Relationships of organization size to complexity and coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knauerhase, Ramon. (1975). The Saudi Arabian economy. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz, Sanford, and Gibbs, Jack P. (1964). Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor: Further evidence. Pacific Sociological Review, 7, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzer, Gertrude. (1975). August Comte and positivism: The essential writings. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenfeld, Frank. (1961). Does administrative staff grow as fast as the organization? Social Life, 43, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, L. Huan-Ming. (1984). East Asian migration to the Middle East: Causes, consequences, and considerations. International Migration Review, 18, 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, Bruce. (1987). Ending ecology’s ethnocentrism: Thai replications and extensions of ecological research. Rural Sociology, 52, 483–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melman, S. (1951). The rise of administrative overhead in the manufacturing industries of the United States (1889–1947). Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 62–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Planning. (1980). Third development plan /400–1405 A.H., /980–1985. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: M. P. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Planning. (1970–1982). Achievements of the development plans. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: M. P. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noell, James J. (1974). On the administrative sector of social systems: An analysis of the size and complexity of government bureaucracies in the American states. Social Forces, 52, 549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, Patrick. (1979). Size and administrative intensity in nations. American Sociological Review, 44, 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, Louis. (1969). Effects of size, complexity, and ownership on administrative intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Population Reference Bureau. (1987). Data sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau. Raphael, Edna E. (1967). The Anderson-Warkov hypothesis in local unions: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 32, 768–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushing, William A. (1967a). Effects of industry size and the division of labor on administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushing, William A. (1967b). Two patterns of industrial administration. Human Organization, 26, 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen-Koob, Saskia. (1981). Towards a conceptualization of immigrant labor. Social Problems, 29, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency. (1969). Annual report. Jiddah, Saudi Arabia: Dar Al-Asfahany. Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency. (1979). Statistical summary. Saudi Arabia: National Offset Printing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg. (1902). The numbers of members as determining the sociological form of groups I and 1 I. American Journal of Sociology, 8, 1–46, 138–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. [ 1776 ] (1937). The wealth of nations. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert. (1877). The principles of sociology. New York: D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, William H. (1965). Organizational growth and development. In J. E. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 451–451 ). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrien, Frederick W., and Mills, Donald L. (1955). The effect of changing size upon the internal structure of organizations. American Sociological Review, 20, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D’Arcy. (1917). On growth and form. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. United Nations, Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. (1981). Demographic yearbook 1981. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. (1982). Demographic indicators of countries. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Rupert B., and Sarah Smith. (1954). Metropolitan dominance and integration. In Rupert B. Vance and N.J. Demerath (Eds.), The urban South (pp. 114–114 ). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, Richard A. (1977). The dimensionality of the urban functional system. Demography, 14, 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Myron. (1982). International migration and development: Indians in the Persian Gulf. Population and Development Review, 8, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, Joan. (1958). Management and technology. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frisbie, W.P., Al-Khalifah, A.H.M. (1998). Division of Labor and Morphological Response. In: Micklin, M., Poston, D.L. (eds) Continuities in Sociological Human Ecology. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9841-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9841-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9843-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9841-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics