Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Staging Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
Atlas of Laparoscopic Surgery

Abstract

While laparoscopic techniques in urology have developed at a slower pace than in other surgical disciplines, it is interesting to note that the initial description of endoscopic inspection of the peritoneal cavity in 1901 by Kelling made use of a Nitze cystoscope; therefore, the earliest reports of laparbscopy used urologic instruments [1]. However, the true pioneering efforts in the field of laparoscopy must be credited to the gynecologists [2]. Recently, the application of laparoscopic techniques for cholecystectomy by the general surgeon has greatly facilitated the widespread use of laparoscopy [3]. Until recently, the major applications for laparoscopy in urology were evaluation of the undescended testis and occasional biopsy of an abdominal or pelvic mass [4,5]. However, with laparoscopic training now being instituted into most surgical training programs and widespread accessibility to laparoscopic training courses, the number of reported laparoscopic urologic procedures has increased (Table 23–1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gunning JE: History of laparoscopy. In Laparoscopy. Edited by Phillips JM. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1977:6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Semm K: Atlas of Gynecologic Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Muhe E: Die erste Cholecystektome durch das Laparoskop. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1986, 369:804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortesi N, Ferrari P, Zambarda E, et al.: Diagnosis of bilateral abdominal cryptorchidism by laparoscopy. Endoscopy 1976, 8:33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Das S, Amar AD: The impact of laparoscopy on modern urologic practice. Urol Clin North Am 1988, 15:537–540.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnheim FK: Carcinoma of the prostate: a study of the postmortem findings in one hundred and seventy-six cases. J Urol 1948, 60:599–603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arduino LJ, Glucksman MA: Lymph node metastases in early carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1962, 88:91–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prout GR Jr, Heaney JA, Griffin PP: Nodal involvement as a prognostic indicator in patients with prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1980, 124:226–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gervasi LA, Mata J, Easley JD, et al.: Prognostic significance of lymph nodal metastases in prostate cancer. J Urol 1989, 142:332–336.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McLaughlin AR, Saltztein SL, McCullough DL, Gittes RF: Prostate carcinoma: incidence and localization of unsuspected lymphatic metastases. J Urol 1976, 115:89–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brendler CB, Cleeve LK, Anderson EE, Paulson DF:Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: risk versus benefit. J Urol 1980, 124:849–850.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paul DB, Loening SA, Narayana AS, Culp DA: Morbidity from pelvic lymphadenectomy in staging carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1983, 129:1141–1144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schuessler WW, Vancaillie TG, Reich H, Griffith DP: Transperitoneal endosurgical lymphadenectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1991, 145:988–991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerbl K, Clayman RV, Petros JA, et al.: Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. J Urol 1993, 150:396–399.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schuessler WW, Pharand D, Vancaillie TG: Laparoscopic standard pelvic node dissection for carcinoma of the prostate: is it accurate? J Urol 1993, 150:898–901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parra RO, Andrus C, Boulliler J: Staging laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: comparison of results with open pelvic lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1992, 147:875–878.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kavoussi LR, Sosa E, Chandhoke P, et al.: Complications of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol 1993, 149:322–325.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Petros JA, Catalona WJ: Lower incidence of unsuspected lymph node metastases in 521 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1992, 147:1574–1575.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Danella JF, DeKernion JB, Smith RB, Steckel J: The contemporary incidence of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer: implications for laparoscopic lymph node dissection. J Urol 1993, 149:1488–1491.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Price, D.T., Robertson, C.N. (1996). Laparoscopic Staging Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Prostate Cancer. In: Atlas of Laparoscopic Surgery. Current Medicine Group, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9316-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9316-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Current Medicine Group, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9318-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9316-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics