Skip to main content

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests: Testing Methods and Interpretive Problems

  • Chapter
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 349))

Abstract

Infectious diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. This fact places a tremendous burden on the clinical microbiology laboratory to diagnose rapidly the etiologic agent(s) responsible for a patient’s infection and provide therapeutic guidance for eradication of the organism(s). Laboratories are asked not only to perform these tasks with precision and rapidity, but also in a cost-effective manner in an era of increasing emphasis on reduction of laboratory expenses. Physicians will pose the question — How accurately can antimicrobial susceptibility tests predict clinical outcome? At the same time, the microbiologists ask — What method should we use for performing susceptibility tests? What is the most accurate method? What is the most cost — effective method? What are the limitations of the in vitro tests? I will try to address these questions in the following discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H.F. Chambers, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 1:173–186 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C.E. Cherubin, R. Eng, M. Appleman, A Critique of Semi-automated Susceptibility Systems. Rev Infect Dis 9:655–659 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P.R. Coudon, D.L. Jones, H.P. Dalton, G.L. Archer, Evaluation of Laboratory Tests for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol 24:764–769 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.A. Fuller, D.E. Low, A.E. Simor, Evaluation of a Commercial Microtiter System (MicroScan) Using both Frozen and Freeze-Dried Panels for Detection of High Level Aminoglycoside Resistance in Enterococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol 28:1051–1053 (1990).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R.N. Jones, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST): A Review qf Changing Trends, Quality Control Guidelines, Test Accuracy, and Recommendation for the Testing of Beta-Lactam Drugs Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1:1–24 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.N. Jones, D.C. Edson, and the CAP Microbiology Resource Committee, Interlaboratory Performance of Disk Agar Diffusion and Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests, 1979–1981. Am J Clin Pathol 78:651–658, (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. P.R. Murray, J.R. Zeitinger, DJ. Krogstad, Reliability of Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing. Infect Control 3:230–237, (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, 4th Ed., Approved Standard. NCCLS Document M2–A4. Villanova, PA: 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, 2nd Ed., Approved Standard. NCCLS Document M7–A2. Villanova, PA: 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pfaller MA, AC Niles, PR Murray. Evaluation of the Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Test as a Screening Test for High Level Aminoglycoside Resistance in Enterococci. Am J Clin Pathol 82:458–460, (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahm DF, S Boonlayangoor, JE Schulz. Detection of High-Level Aminoglycoside Resistance in Enterococci other than Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Microbiol 29:2595–2598 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Washington JA. Discrepancies between In Vitro Activity of and In Vivo Response to Antimicrobial Agents. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1:25–31 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woolfrey BF, RT Lally, MN Ederer. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic System for Detection of Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to Methicillin. J Clin Microbiol 19:464–467 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murray, P.R. (1994). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests: Testing Methods and Interpretive Problems. In: Poupard, J.A., Walsh, L.R., Kleger, B. (eds) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 349. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9206-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9206-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9208-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9206-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics