Abstract
Acoustic communication constitutes an important and conspicuous part of the breeding biology of most anurans: in the establishment and maintenance of territories by males, in facilitating the attraction of conspecific mates to males, in courtship, and in the identification of sex and reproductive state. The aim of this review is to examine the long-range acoustic communication system of anurans through an integrated and evolutionary approach, and to consider the constraints on the system in the context of reproduction. A useful framework on which to build such an approach is provided by the model of a communication system initially developed by Shannon and Weaver (1949), and applied to biological systems by Cherry (1957), Johnston (1976), Moles (1963) and others. This biocommunication system consists of four main elements: the common repertoire (set of signs), the source (emitter or transmitter),the communication channel and associated noise, and the destination or receiver (Fig. 1). Each functional subsystem, emitter complex and receiver complex, is normally contained within the structure of one individual. A message is selected from the common repertoire, encoded and introduced into the channel as a signal. Perturbations of the channel (noise) tend to reduce the intelligence of the signal (information content), which is subsequently accepted by the receiver, decoded and compared with the contents of its repertoire. The result is an output that completes the bio-communicative sequence. The incorporation of redundancy into the message, through synonymy or repetition, helps to overcome the problem of a noisy channel, but at the expense of energy, time and transmission rate.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, R. D. 1975. Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. IN: D. Pimentel (ed.), Insects, Science and Society pp. 35–77. Academic Press, New York.
Allan, D. M. 1973. Some relationships of vocalization to behavior in the Pacific treefrog, Hyla regilla. Herpetologica 29:366–371.
Awbrey, F. T. 1965. An experimental investigation of the effec- tiveness of anuran mating calls as isolating mechanisms.Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Texas, Austin.
Axtell, R. W. 1959. Female reaction to the male call in two anurans (Amphibia). Southwest.Nat. 3:70–76.
Aylor, D. 1972. Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J. Acoust. Soc.Am. 51:197–205.
Blair, W. F. 1955. Mating call and stage of speciation in the Microhyla olivacea-M. carolinensis complex. Evolution 9: 469–480.
Blair, W. F. 1956. The mating calls of hybrid toads. Texas.J. Sci. 8:350–355.
Blair, W. F. 1963. Acoustic behaviour of Amphibia. IN: R. G. Busnel (ed.), Acoustic Behaviour of Animals pp. 694–708, 803–804. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Blair, W. F. 1968. Amphibians and reptiles. IN: T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Animal Communication pp. 289–310. Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington.
Blair, W. F. 1974. Character displacement in frogs. Am. Zool. 14:1119–1125.
Bogert, C. M. 1960. The influence of sound on the behavior of amphibians and reptiles. IN: W. E. Lanyon and W. N. Tavolga (eds.), Animal Sounds and Communication pp. 137–320. Am. Inst. Biol. Sci. Publ. 7, Washington, D. C.
Brown, W. L., and E. O. Wilson. 1956. Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 5:49–64.
Capranica, R. R. 1965. The Evoked Vocal Response of the Bullfrog. Research Monograph, No. 33. M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Capranica, R. R. 1976. The auditory system. IN: B. Lofts (ed.), Physiology of the Amphibia, Vol. III pp. 443–466. Academic Press, New York.
Capranica, R. R., and A. J. M. Moffat. 1975. Selectivity of the peripheral auditory system of spadefoot toads (Scaphiopus couchi) for sounds of biological significance. J. Comp. Physiol. 100:231–249.
Cherry, C. 1957. On Human Communication. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Conant, R. 1975. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America ( Second Edition ). Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.
Dixon, J. R. 1957. Geographic variation and distribution of the genus Tomodactylus in Mexico. Texas J. Sci. 9:379–409.
Embletori, T. F. W., J. E. Piercy and N. Olson. 1976. Outdoor sound propagation over ground of finite impedance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59:267–277.
Feng, A. S., H. C. Gerhardt and R. R. Capranica. 1976. Sound localization behavior of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) and the barking treefrog (H. gratiosa). J. Comp. Physiol. 107: 241–252.
Fisher, R. A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Second Edition). Dover Publications, New York.
Forester, D. C. 1973. Mating call as a reproductive isolating mechanism between Scaphiopus bombifrons and S. harrunondi. Copeia 1973:60–67.
Fouquette, M. J. 1975. Speciation in chorus frogs. I. Reproductive character displacement in the Pseudacris nigrita complex. Syst. Zool.24:16–23.
Frishkopf, L. S., R. R. Capranica and M. H. Goldstein. 1968. Neural coding in the bullfrog’s auditory system. A teleological approach. Proc. I. E. E. E. 56:969–980.
Frishkopf, L. S., and M. H. Goldstein. 1963. Responses to acoustic stimuli from single units in the eighth nerve of the bullfrog. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35:1219–1228.
Gans, C. 1973. Sound production in the Salientia: Mechanism and evolution of the emitter. Am. Zool. 13:1179–1194.
Gerhardt, H. C. 1973. Reproductive interactions between Hyla crucifer and Pseudacris ornata (Anura: Hylidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 89:81–88.
Gerhardt, H. C. 1974a. The vocalizations of sane hybrid tree-frogs: Acoustic and behavioural analyses. Behaviour 49: 130–151.
Gerhardt, H. C. 1974b. Behavioral isolation of the treefrogs, Hyla cinerea and Hyla andersonii.Am. Midl. Nat. 91:424–433.
Gerhardt, H. C. 1974c. The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea).J. Exp. Biol. 61:229–241.
Gerhardt, H. C. 1975. Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads. J. Comp. Physiol. 102:1-12.
Gerhardt, H. C. 1976. Significance of two frequency bands in long distance vocal communication in the green treefrog. Nature 261:692–694.
Grant, P. R. 1972. Convergent and divergent character displacement.Biol.J.Linn. Soc.4:39–68
Harris,C.M. 1966.Absorption of sound in air versus humidity and temperature. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 40:148–159.
Hawe,S.M. 1970. Calling behavior and territoriality in males of two species of Crinia (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Unpublished B. Sc. Honours Research Report, Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne.
Hill, K. G., and G. S. Boyan. 1976. Directional hearing in crickets. Nature 262:390–391.
Johnston, T. D. 1976. Theoretical considerations in the adaptation of animal communication systems. J. Theoret. Biol. 57: 43–72.
Konishi, M. 1970. Evolution of design features in the coding of species-specificity. Am. Zool. 10:67–72.
Littlejohn, M. J. 1964. Geographic isolation and mating call differentiation in Crinia signifera. Evolution 18:262–266.
Littlejohn, M. J. 1965a. Premating isolation in the Hyla ewingi complex (Ahura: Hylidae). Evolution 19:234–243.
Littlejohn, M. J. 1965b. Vocal communication in frogs. Aust. Nat. Hist.15:52–55.
Littlejohn, M. J. 1969. The systematic significance of isolating mechanisms. IN: Systematic Biology. Proceedings of an International Conference, pp. 459–482. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C.
Littlejohn, M. J. 1971. A re-appraisal of mating call differentiation in Hyla cadaverina (= Hyla californiae) and Hyla regilla. Evolution 25:98–102.
Littlejohn, M. J. 1976. The Litoria ewingi complex (Anura: Hylidae) in south-eastern Australia. IV. Variation in mating-call structure across a narrow hybrid zone between L. ewingi L. paraewingi. Aust. J. Zool. 24:283–293.
Littlejohn, M. J., and J. J. Loftus-Hills. 1968. An experimental evaluation of premating isolation in the Hyla ewingi complex (Anura: Hylidae). Evolution 22:659–663.
Littlejohn, M. J., and A. A. Martin. 1964. The Crinia laevis complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in south-eastern Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 12:70–83.
Littlejohn, M. J., and A. A. Martin. 1965. Mating call structure in three sympatric species of Limnodynastes (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Copeia 1965:509–511.
Littlejohn, M. J., and A. A. Martin. 1969. Acoustic interaction between two species of leptodactylid frogs. Anim. Behay.17: 785–791.
Littlejohn, M. J., and G. F. Watson. 1973. Mating-call variation across a narrow hybrid zone between Crinia laevis and C. victoriana (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Aust. J. Zool. 21:277–284.
Littlejohn, M. J., and G. F. Watson. 1974. Mating call discrimination and phonotaxis by females of the Crinia laevis complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Copeia 1974:171–175.
Littlejohn, M. J., and G. F. Watson. 1976. Effectiveness of a hybrid mating call in eliciting phonotaxis by females of the Geocrinia laevis complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Copeia 1976:76–79.
Littlejohn, M. J., G. F. Watson and J. J. Loftus-Hills. 1971. Contact hybridization in the Crinia laevis complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Aust. J. Zool. 19:85–100.
Loftus-Hills, J. J. 1971a. Neural correlates of acoustic behaviour in the Australian bullfrog Limnodynastes dorsal is(Anura: Leptodactylidae). Z. Vergl. Physiol. 74:140–152.
Loftus-Hills, J. J. 1971b. Auditory Function and Acoustic Communication in Anuran Amphibians. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Loftus-Hills, J. J. 1973a. Comparative aspects of auditory function in Australian anurans. Aust. J. Zool. 21:353–367.
Loftus-Hills, J. J. 1973b. Neural mechanisms underlying acoustic behaviour of the frog Pseudophryne semimarmorata (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Anim. Behay. 21: 781–787.
Loftus-Hills, J. J. 1974. Analysis of an acoustic pacemaker in Strecker’s chorus frog Pseudacris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 90:75–87.
Loftus-Hills, J. J., and B. M. Johnstone. 1970. Auditory function, communication and brain-evoked response in anuran amphibians. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 47:1131–1138.
Loftus-Hills, J. J., and M. J. Littlejohn. 1971a. Matingicall sound intensities of anuran amphibians. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:1327–1329.
Loftus-Hills, J. J., and M. J. Littlejohn. 1971b. Pulse repetition rate as the basis for mating call discrimination by two sympatric species of Hyla. Copeia1971:154–156.
Lombard, R. E., and I. R. Straughan. 1974. Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. J. Exp. Biol. 61:71–93.
Lörcher, K. 1969. Vergleichende bio-akustische untersuchungen an der rot-und gelbbauchunke, Bombina bombina (L.) und Bombina v. variegata (L.). Oecologia 3:84–124.
Marier, P. 1967. Animal communication signals. Science 157:769–774.
Martin, A. A. 1972. Studies in Australian Amphibia. III. The Limnodynastes dorsal is complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Aust. J. Zool. 20:165–211.
Martin, W. F. 1971. Mechanics of sound production in toads of the genus Bufo: Passive elements. J. Exp. Zool. 176:273–294.
Martin, W. F. 1972. Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. IN: W. F. Blair (ed.), Evolution in the Genus Bufo pp. 279–309. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.
Martin, W. F., and C. Gans. 1972. Muscular control of the vocal tract during release signaling in the toad Bufo valliceps.J. Morphol. 137:1–27.
McAlister, W. H. 1959. The vocal structures and method of call production in the genus Scaphiopus Holbrook. TexasJ. Sci. 11: 60–77.
McAlister, W. H. 1961. The mechanics of sound production in North American Bufo. Copeia 1961:86-95.
McDiarmid, R. W., and K. Adler. 1974. Notes on territorial and vocal behavior of neotropical frogs of the genus Centrolenella. Herpetologica30:75–78.
Moles, A. 1963. Animal language and information theory. IN: R.G. Busnel (ed.), Acoustic Behaviour of Animals pp. 112–131. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Morton, E. S. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Amer. Nat. 109:17–34.
Nairns, P. M., and R. R. Capranica. 1976. Sexual differences in the auditory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. Science192:378–380.
Nevo, E., and H. Schneider. 1976. Mating call pattern of green toads in Israel and its ecological correlate. J. Zool. (Lond.) 178:133–145.
Otte, D. 1974. Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.5:385–417.
Paille E, M. 1971. Communication acoustique chez les amphibians anoures. J. de Psychol. Norm. et. Pathol. 1971:327–351.
Ralin, D. B. 1968. Ecological and reproductive differentiation in the cryptic species of the Hyla versicolor complex (Hylidae). Southwest. Nat. 13:283–299.
Rosen, M., and R. E. Lemon. 1974. The vocal behavior of spring peepers, Hyla crucifer. Copeia1974:940–950.
Schmidt, R. S. 1973. Central mechanisms of frog calling. Am. Zool. 13:1169–1177.
Schneider, H. 1967. Rufe und rufverhalten des laubfrosches, Hyla arborea arborea (L.). Z. Vergl. Physiol. 57:174–189.
Schneider, H. 1968. Bio-akustische untersuchungen am Mittelmeerlaubfrosch. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 61:369–385.
Schneider, H. 1974. Structure of the mating calls and relationships of the European tree frogs (Hylidae, Anura). Oecologia 14: 99–110.
Schneider, H., and H. Eichelberg. 1974. The mating call of hybrids of the fire-bellied toad and yellow-bellied toad (Bombina bombina (L.), Bombina v. variegata (L.), Discoglossidae, Anura). Oecologia 16: 61–71.
Schneider, H., and E. Nevo. 1972. Bio-acoustic study of the yellow-lemon tree frog, I3yla arborea savignyi Audouin. Zool. Jb. Physiol. 76:497–506.
Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.
Snyder, W. F., and D. L. Jameson. 1965. Multivariate geographic variation of mating call in populations of the Pacific tree frog (Hyla regilla).Copeia 1965:129–142.
Straughan, I. R. 1973. Evolution of anuran mating calls. Bioacousticasl aspects. IN: J. A. Vial (ed.), Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans pp. 321–327. Univ. Missouri Press, Columbia.
Straughan, I. R. 1975. An analysis of the mechanisms of mating call discrimination in the frogs Hyla regilla and H. cadaver-ira. Copeia 1975:415–424.
Strother, W. F. 1959. The electrical response of the auditory mechanism in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52:157–162.
Watkins, W. A., E. R. Baylor and A. T. Bowen. 1970. The call of Eleutherodactylus johnstonei the whistling frog of Bermuda. Copeia 1970:558–561.
Wells, K. D. 1976. Territorial Behaviour of the Green Frog (Rana clamitans). Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca.
Wells, K. D. In press. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians: A review. Anim. Behay.
Whitney, C. L., and J. R. Krebs. 1975. Spacing and calling in Pacific tree frogs,Hyla regilla. Can.J. Zool. 53:1519–1527.
Wiener, F. M., and D. N. Keast. 1959. Experimental study of the propagation of sound over ground. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31: 724–733.
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Zweifel, R. G. 1959. Effect of temperature on call of the frogBombina variegata. Copeia 1959:322–327.
Zweifel, R. G. 1968. Effects of temperature, body size, and hybridization on mating calls of toads, Bufoa. americanus and Bufo woodhousei fowleri. Copeia 1968:269–285.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Littlejohn, M.J. (1977). Long-Range Acoustic Communication in Anurans: An Integrated and Evolutionary Approach. In: Taylor, D.H., Guttman, S.I. (eds) The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6781-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6781-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6783-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6781-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive