Skip to main content

Parallelization Strategies for Matrix Assembly in Finite Element Methods

  • Chapter
Parallel Algorithms for Irregular Problems: State of the Art

Abstract

Adaptive finite element methods include unstructured discretization meshes. Most algorithms for the matrix assembly follow the ordering of the arising meshes. Time-dependent problems resulting in rapidly changing locally refined (i.e. unstructured) discretization grids need a matrix assembly in each timestep. This demands a considerable amount of computing time which in turn calls for parallelization.

Domain decomposition techniques often suffer from insufficient load balancing. Especially in adaptive methods balancing the computational workload is difficult, because the number of unknowns in each domain is not predictable and even may change during the computation.

Analysing data dependencies in the matrix assembly, one obtains the problem to synchronize access to one node (matrix element) from neighbouring elements. An efficient algorithm based on coloring the elements following a very simple tabulated indexing scheme has been found. Within each color, calculation is free of data dependencies. Load balancing becomes easy, because data can be distributed uniformly among the processors. This method works well for shared memory architectures.

For distributed memory computers, however, the color indexing method fails, because logical and physical ordering differ, thus physical data access is not structured. A second method for parallelizing the same problem (i.e. matrix assembly in finite element methods) has been developed. Using index-arrays for mapping the logical ordering to a suitable physical (storage-) ordering, one obtains an almost optimally load balanced and efficient algorithm.

Timing results for an Alliant FX/2800 (color indexing) and a Kendall Square Research KSR-1 show the efficiency of both algorithms.

Timing results for an Alliant FX/2800 (color indexing) and a Kendall Square Research KSR-1 show the efficiency of both algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alliant Computer Systems Corp., Littleton (Massachusetts). FX/2800 System Description, mar 1991. Part no. 300–00500.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Behrens. Optimierung eines Mehrgitterverfahrens und eines Hierarchische Basen Verfahrens auf einer Alliant FX/80. Diplomarbeit, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, 1990. Erstellt am Alfred-Wegener-Institut Bremerhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Hiller and J. Behrens. Parallelisierung von Mehrgitteralgorithmen auf der Alliant FX/80. In H. W. Meuer, editor, Parallelisierung komplexer Probleme, pages 37–82, Berlin, 1991. Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. R. W. Hockney and C. R. Jesshope. Parallel Computers 2, Architecture, Programming and Algorithms. Adam Hilger, Bristol Philadelphia, 2nd edition, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. T. Jones and P. E Plassmann. A parallel graph coloring heuristic. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 14 (3): 654–669, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kendall Square Research Corp., Waltham. KSR1 System Administration, Dec. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Lang. Kurzbeschreibung des Programmes PFRG02. Technical report, Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau, Hamburg, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Liou and T. E. Tezduyar. Clustered element-by-element computations for fluid flow. In H. D. Simon, editor, Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics: Implementations and Results, Scientific and Engineering Computation, pages 167–187, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1992. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. F. Mitchell. A comparison of adaptive refinement techniques for elliptic problems. ACM Trans. in Math. Softw,15(4):326–347, 1989.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Yserentant. On the multi-level splitting of finite element spaces. Numer. Math., 49: 379–412, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Behrens, J. (1995). Parallelization Strategies for Matrix Assembly in Finite Element Methods. In: Ferreira, A., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds) Parallel Algorithms for Irregular Problems: State of the Art. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6130-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6130-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4747-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6130-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics