Abstract
Composition is the aggregate of ingredients, their arrangement, and the integrated interrelationship which form a unified, harmonious whole. Figure 8.1 is an example that represents the composite average of cattle, hogs, and sheep and includes the major parts. Because animals are intentionally raised to produce meat for humans, the greatest emphasis is the musculature and its relationship to everything else. The proportion of the animal’s musculature is related to several criteria, but the three most important are visceral proportions (primarily affected by contents of the alimentary canal and pregnancy), fatness, and muscling (as expressed by muscle/bone). Variations in fatness and muscling are illustrated by the exhibits shown in Fig. 8.2., and practical averages of carcass composition (including poultry, fish, and venison) are included in Table 8.1. Since Fig. 8.1 represents a composite of beef, pork and lamb, Figs. 8.3–8.6 are included to illustrate how each of these three species’ parts are divided into muscle, fat, and bone. These are averages that are highly dependent on method of cutting, stage of growth, and heredity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Selected References
A.O.A.C. 1990. In: Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed., K. Helrich; ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
Berg, R.T. and R.M. Butterfield. 1976. New Concepts of Cattle Growth. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Ellenberger, H.B., J.A. Newlander, and C.H. Jones. 1950. Compositions of the Bodies of Dairy Cattle, Bulletin 558, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Elsley, F.W.H., I. McDonald, and V.R. Fowler. 1964. The effect of plane of nutrition on the carcasses of pigs and lambs when variations in fat content are excluded, Anim. Prod. 6: 141.
Fahey, T.J., D.M. Schaefer, R.G. Kauffman, R.J. Epley, P.F. Gould, J.R. Romans, G.C. Smith, and D.G. Topel. 1977. A comparison of practical methods to estimate pork carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 8.
Forrest, J.C., C.H. Kuei, W. Chen, R.S. Lin, A.P. Schinckel, P. Walstra, H. Kooper, and M.D. Judge. 1991. Electromagnetic scanning: carcass evaluation. In: Electronic Evaluation of Meat in Support of Value-Based Marketing. Pages 85 - 111. Purdue Meat Science Industrial Advisory Consortium and Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Kauffman, R.G. 1971. Variation in gross composition of meat animals. Proc. Recip. Meat Conf. 24: 292.
McMeekan, C.P. 1941. Growth and development in the pig with special reference to carcass quality characters. J. Agric. Sci. 31: 1.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kauffman, R.G., Breidenstein, B.C. (1994). Meat-Animal Composition and Its Measurement. In: Kinsman, D.M., Kotula, A.W., Breidenstein, B.C. (eds) Muscle Foods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5933-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5933-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5935-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5933-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive