Abstract
In this chapter we examine two international institutions, OECD and UNCTAD, often mentioned in the press, but whose cost seems to exceed their benefit. They are known for their tendency to broach numerous subjects of a general nature. This is particularly true of the UNCTAD.
Unlike old soldiers, international institutions never fade away, they grow ever larger and everpowerful.
Sir Alan Walters
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
A. OECD
Economic Studies (half-yearly);
Economic Surveys (regularly for each member country; more detailed than in Economic Outlook);
See also R. Scott, The history of the International Energy Agency 19741994 (OECD, Paris, 3 vol., 1994-95). For a detailed review of DAC-activities see the yearly published Development Cooperation. Efforts and policies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee. For the numerous publications issued by the OECD, see the 1996 catalogue. See also Chapter 6 (OEEC).
The extracts quoted are from: R.O. Keohane, art. cit.;
A. Lindbeck, “Possible future conflicts in a growing world economy” in Economic science and problems of economic growth (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974), F. Couigneau, La nécessité de l’impertinence, Le Monde, 21 October 1986.
B. Unctad
The most noteworthy of UNCTAD’s publications are the UNCTAD Commodity Survey,19—. and Handbook of international trade and development statistics (New York, UN, 19-);
see also Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (New York, since 1973);
Trade and Development Report (annually since 1981).
See also: UNCTAD and the south-north dialogue. The first twenty years (ed. M. Zammit Cutajar, Oxford, New York, Toronto, Pergamon, 1985).
Most of the relevant data (but naturally no criticism on the operation of the agreements) are to be found in the publications of the various commodity councils.
See also A. Maizels, Selected issues in the negotiation of international commodity agreements. An economic analysis (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 1982 );
A.I. MacBean and D.T. Nguyen, Commodity policies. Problems and prospects, London, Croom Helm, 1987.
R. Dand, The international cocoa trade (Abington, Woodhead, 1993);
M. Raffaelli, Rise and demise of commodity agreements. An investigation into the breakdown of international commodity agreements (Cambridge, Woodhead, 1995).
The extracts quoted are from D.T. Healy, Development policy. New thinking about an interpretation, Journal of Economic Literature,Sept. 1972;
H.G. Grubel, The case against the New International Economic Order, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,1977, Heft. 2;
Unloved, unuseful UNCTAD, The Economist,13 April 1985.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Meerhaeghe, M.A.G. (1998). OECD and UNCTAD. In: International Economic Institutions. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5565-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5565-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5021-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5565-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive