Skip to main content

A Taxonomy and Critique of Measurements Used in the Study of Creativity

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

Creativity measurement itself has been a creative endeavor for both researchers and practitioners. When viewed as a group, the most salient characteristic of creativity measurements is their diversity. The initial purpose of this review is to integrate creativity measurements into a meaningful taxonomy and to illustrate the diversity of the available measurements by citing key examples of the many and varied ways in which creativity has been operationalized. It also is hoped that the numerous examples will give researchers a concise but thorough picture of the many options available when a measure of creativity is needed. The second goal of this review is to use the taxonomy as a framework for discussing the creativity construct in terms of several psychometric characteristics—namely, reliability, discriminant validity, and nomological validity. The third goal is to describe an analytic framework in which measurement issues can be better addressed.

Permission to reproduce sections of this article has been granted by the Society for Personality Assessment, Inc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A., and Schaefer, C. E. (1969). Biographical correlates of artistic and literary creativity in adolescent girls. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 267–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. (1975). Social and psychological factors which influence the creative process. In I. A. Taylor and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity. Chicago: Adline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., and Welsh, G. (1952). Artistic perception as a factor in personality style: Its measurement by a figure preference test. Journal of Psychology, 33, 199–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M., and Davis, G. A. (1974). Do the Wallach and Kogan tests predict real creative behavior? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basadur, M., and Finkbeiner, C. T. (1985). Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beittel, K. R. (1964). Creativity in the visual arts in higher education: Criteria, predictors, experimentation and their interactions. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. (1985). Theory and implementation ofEQS: A Structural equations program. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables. In M. R. Rosenweig and L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 419–56 ). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, S. N. (1973). Divergent thinking ability: A validation study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. M., and Guilford, J. P. (1969). Plot Titles. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgstadt, C., and Glover, J. A. (1980). Contrasting novel and repetitive stimuli in creativity training. Psychological Reports, 46, 652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, W. L., and Beittel, K. R. (1964). A study of some tests of creativity in relationship to performances in the visual arts. In W. L. Brittain (Ed.), Creativity and art education. Washington, DC: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buel, W. D. (1965). Biographical data and the identification of creative research personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 318–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buel, W. D., Albright, L. E., and Glennon, J. R. (1966). A note on the generality and cross-validity of personal history for identifying creative research scientists. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 217–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, K. S., and Davis, G. A. (1982). Inventory for appraising adult creativity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R., and Butcher, H. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R., and Drevdahl, J. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P.F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators and the general population. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 248261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R., and Eber, H. (1968). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: IPAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. R., Merrifield, P. R., and Guilford, J. P. (1958). Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Merrifield, P. R., and Wilson, R. C. (1960). Alternate Uses. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V. (1966). A childhood attitude inventory for problem solving. Journal of Educational Measurement, 3, 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockenberg, S. (1972). Creativity tests: Boom or boon-doggie? Review of Educational Research, 42, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (1972). A five-year longitudinal study of the validity of creativity tests. Developmental Psychology, 6, 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Getzels, J. W. (1970). Concern for discovery: An attitudinal component of creative production. Journal of Personality, 38, 91–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (1971). Instruments useful in studying creative behavior and creative talent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 16 2165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., and Belcher, T. L. (1971). How shall creativity be measured? Torrance tests, RAT, Alpha Biographical and IQ. Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., and Rimm, S. (1982). (GIFFI) I and II: Instruments for identifying creative potential in the junior and senior high school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellas, M., and Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewing, K. (1970). The reliability and validity of selected tests of creative thinking in a sample of seventh-grade West Australian children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domino, G. (1970). Identification of potentially creative persons from the Adjective Check List. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 48–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drevdahl, J. E. (1956). Factors of importance for creativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 21–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service (1987). Annotated bibliography of tests: Creativity and divergent thinking. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, B. A. (1973). Creativity in black artists: A comparison of selected creativity measures using judged creativity as a criterion. Journal of Non-White Concerns in Personnel and Guidance, 1, 150–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G., and Forbach, G. B. (1983). Facilitation of performance on a divergent measure of creativity: A closer look at instructions to “be creative.” Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, D., and Hattie, J. A. (1983). An evaluation of the “Your Style of Learning and Thinking” inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 336–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1968). Ingenuity Test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 215–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (1971). Creativity and the teacher. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, G. (1979). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: VI. M and the intrapsychic life of individuals. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 1267–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, N., Evans, F., and Ward, W. (1975). Development of provisional criteria for the study of scientific creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, B. (1965). Opinion, Attitude, and Interest Survey handbook: A guide to personality and interest measurement. Ann Arbor, MI: OAIS Testing Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, V. R., Kelso, G. B., and Moran, J. D., III (1984). The effects of stimulus dimension and mode of exploration on original thinking in preschool children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1964). Creative thinking in art students: An exploratory study. (Cooperative Research Project No. E-008). Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, M. (1972). The psychology of creativity. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golann, S. E. (1963). Psychological study of creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 548–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E. (1986). Convergent validity of four innovativeness scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby, T., and Helwig, L. (1975). Concurrent validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and the Welsh Figural Preference Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 507–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. (1957). The California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. (1976). Studying creativity by means of word association tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 348–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., and Heilbrun, A. B. (1965). The Adjective Check List: Manual Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, W. R. (1965). Creative and constructive idea men and their participation in activities. The Journal of General Psychology, 72, 383–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of the intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Robert R. Knapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P., andZimmerman, W. S. (1963). Guilford-Zimmerman Interest Inventory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddon, F. A., and Lytton, H. (1971). Primary education and divergent thinking abilities-four years on. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 41, 136–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W., and MacKinnon, D. (1969). Personality inventory correlates of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 322–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W. B. (1972). A technique for assessing aesthetic predispositions: Mosaic Construction Tests. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, G., Halpin, G., and Torrance, E. P. (1974). Relationships between creative thinking abilities and a measure of the creative personality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, L. R. (1963). The development of a criterion of scientific competence. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. M., Block, J., and Block, J. H. (1983). Predicting creativity in preadolescence from divergent thinking in early childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. M., Block, J. H., and Block, J. (1987). Testing aspects of Carl Rogers’s theory of creative environments: Child-rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 851–856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. (1977). Conditions for administering creativity tests. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1249–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. (1980). Should creativity tests be administered under testlike conditions? An empirical study of three alternative conditions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haven, G. A. (1965). Creative thought, productivity, and the self-concept. Psychological Reports, 16, 750–752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heist, P. (Ed.). (1968). The creative college student: An unmet challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heist, P., and Yonge, G. (1968). Manual for the Omnibus Personality Inventory-Form E New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R. (1965). Childhood interest clusters related to creativity in women. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 352–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R. (1971). Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 210–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R., and Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average PhD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 250–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1976). Dimensions of creativity. Psychological Reports, 39, 869–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979a). The unidimensional nature of creative thinking in fifth-grade children. Child Study Journal, 9, 273277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979c). A comparison of statistical infrequency, subjective judgment, and random numbers as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 297–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979d). The development of the Creative Behavior Inventory. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 170 350 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D., and El-Zahhar, N. (1984). A paradigm for examining the psychometric characteristics of cross-cultural measurements. In H. M. van der Ploeg, R. Schwarzer, and C. D. Spielberger, Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 4 ). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D., and Michael, W. B. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 917–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1959). Some limitations of teacher ratings as predictors of creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L., and Astin, A. W. (1962). The prediction of the academic, artistic, scientific, and social achievement of undergraduates of superior scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L., and Baird, L. L. (1968). The Preconscious Activity Scale: The development and validation of an originality measure. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L., and Nichols, R. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L., and Richards, J. (1965). Academic and nonacademic accomplishment: Correlated or uncorrelated? Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 165–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D. (1976). A questionnaire measure of the creative personality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtz, J. C., and Speedie, S. M. (1978). Processes underlying divergent thinking and problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 848–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtz, J. C., Lewis, C. D., Shaning, D. J., and Denmark, R. J. (1983). Predictive validity of teacher ratings of creativity over two years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 168173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., and Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4, 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Behavioral Research in Creativity (1968). Alpha Biographical Inventory. Greensboro, NC: Prediction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. A. (1964). Relationships between creative writing and creative drawing of sixth-grade children. In W. L. Brittain (Ed.), Creativity and art education. Washington, DC: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, L. A. (1975). Use of canonical analysis in Cropley’s “A five-year longitudinal study of the validity of creativity tests.” Developmental Psychology, 5, 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., and Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: International Educational Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltsounis, B. (1971). Instruments useful in studying creative behavior and creative talent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltsounis, B. (1972). Additional instruments useful in studying creative behavior and creative talent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlins, M., Schuerhoff, C., and Kaplan, M. (1969). Some factors related to architectural creativity in graduating architecture students. Journal of General Psychology, 81, 203–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. T., and Holland, W. E. (1978). A cross-validation study of the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation inventory in three research and development organizations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatena, J. (1978). Identification and stimulation of creative imagination imagery. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 3038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatena, J., and Torrance, E. P. (1976). Manual for KhatenaTorrance Creative Perception Inventory. Chicago: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, R. H., and Wulff, A. (1963). Preference for abstract and representational art. Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 255262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N., and Pankove, E. (1974). Long-term predictive validity of divergent-thinking tests: Some negative evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 802–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korb, R., and Frankiewicz, R. (1976). Strategy for a priori selection of judges in a product-centered approach to assessment of creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, L., and Erickson, C. (1974). Psychology of scientist: XXXI. Discriminability of creativity scale for the Adjective Check List among scientists and engineers. Psychological Reports, 34, 755–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, C., and Walton, J. R. (1975). Development of a scale for innovativeness. In M. J. Schlinger (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 2 ). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., and Kaufman, M. (1974). Creativeness: Its meaning and measurement. Journal of Reading Behavior, 6, 375–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. (1968). Selecting students with creative potential. In P. Heist (ed.), The creative college student: An unmet challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermid, C. D. (1965). Some correlates of creativity in engineering personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malgady, R. G., and Barcher, P. R. (1977). Psychological scaling of essay creativity: Effects of productivity and novelty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 512–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malgady, R. G., and Barcher, P. R. (1979). Some information-processing models of creative writing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. (in press). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ): III San Antonio, Texas: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., and Hocevar, D. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., and Hocevar, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., and Hocevar, D. (1988). A new, more powerful method of multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, M. T. (1963). Research creativity in psychology graduate students. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 265266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A., and Mednick, M. T. (1967). Examiner’s manual: Remote Associates Test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, M., and Meeker, R. (1975). SOI Learning Abilities test. El Segundo, CA: SOI Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, B., and Stein, M. (1955). Measures of intelligence and creativity. The Journal of Psychology, 39, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, W. B., and Colson, K. R. (1979). The development and validation of a life experience inventory for the identification of creative electrical engineers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 463–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R. M. (1983). Validation of ideational fluency measures of original thinking in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 619–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R. M., and Arad, R. (1981). Ideational fluency as a predictor of original problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 568–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R. M., and Milgram, N. A. (1976a). Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 255–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R. M., and Milgram, N. A. (1976b). Group versus individual administration in the measurement of creative thinking in gifted and nongifted children. Child Development, 47, 563–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R. M., Milgram, N. A., Rosenbloom, G., and Rabkin, L. (1978). Quantity and quality of creative thinking in children and adolescents. Child Development, 49, 385–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, C. J. (1964). Current studies of the personnel research laboratory in creativity. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., and Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, W. A., and Schumacher, C., and Clark, J. (1957). The measurement of creativity in machine design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, D. C. (1963). Relationships between measures of scientific performance and other variables. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrosko, J. (1978). Measuring creativity in elementary school: The current state of the art. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piers, E. V., Daniels, J. M., and Quackenbush, J. F. (1960). The identification of creativity in adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 346–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popperova, M. (1971, 1972 ). Some methodological problems relating to tests of creative thinking. [Czskoslovenska Psycholgie, 15(4), 391–397.] Psychological Abstracts, 49, No. 5666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J., King, F., and Wickwire, P. (1959). Cognitive and other personality characteristics of creative children. Psychological Reports, 5, 729–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J., Hartman, R., and Callahan, C. (1977). Scale for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. In W. Barbe and J. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., Kaltsounis, B., and Torrance, E. P. (1979). A children’s form of “Your Style of Learning and Thinking”: Preliminary norms and technical data. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23, 757–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. M., Cline, V. B., and Needham, W. E. (1964). Creativity tests and teacher and self judgments of originality. Journal of Experimental Education, 32, 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. M., Holland, J. L., and Lutz, S. W. (1967a). Prediction of student accomplishment in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 343–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. M., Holland, J. L., and Lutz, S. W. (1967b). Assessment of student accomplishment in college. The Journal of College Student Personnel, 8, 360–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R., Kinney, D. K., Benet, M., and Merzel, A. P. C. (1988). Assessment of everyday creativity: Characteristics of the lifetime creativity scales and validation with three large samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickborn, I., and Lundsteen, S. (1968). The construction of and acquisition of reliability data for a test of qualitative levels in creative problem solving. California Journal of Educational Research, 19, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S., and Davis, G. (1976). GIFT: An instrument for the identification of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 178–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S., and Davis, G. (1980). Five years of international research with GIFT: An instrument for the identification of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, A. (1951a). A psychological study of physical scientists. Genetic Psychological Monographs, 43, 121–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, A. (1951b). A psychological study of eminent biologists. Psychological Monographs, 65 (No. 331).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rookey, T. J. (1971). The Pennsylvania assessment of creative tendency: Norms-technical manual. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rookey, T. J. (1974). Validation of a creativity test: The 100 students study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 8, 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, B. B., and Gollob, H. F. (1975). Comparison of social judgments of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 271–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, D. M., Langland, L., and Berger, D. (1971). The validity of tests of creative thinking in seven-year-old children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roweton, W. E., Farless, J. E., Donham, R., Wleklinski, D. J., and Spencer, H. L. (1975). Indices of classroom creativity. Child Study Journal, 5, 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers’ judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986a). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986b). Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., and Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, C. (1969). The prediction of creative achievement from a biographical inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, C. (1970). Manual for the Biographical Inventory Creativity (BIC). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, C., and Anastasi, A. (1968). A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent boys. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 42–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, C. E., and Bridges, C. I. (1970). Development of a creativity attitude survey for children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 31, 861–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, G. M. (1983). The measurement and properties of divergent thinking ability as a single compound entity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1976a). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1976b). The causal relation between war and scientific discovery: An exploratory cross-national analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 7, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1976c). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1977a). Creative productivity, age and stress: A biographical time-series of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1977b). Eminence, creativity and geographical marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1603–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skager, R. W., Schultz, C. B., and Klein, S. P. (1965). Quality and quantity of accomplishments as measures of creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 31–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skager, R. W., Klein, S. P., and Schultz, C. B. (1967). The prediction of academic and artistic achievement at a school of design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., and Schaefer, C. (1969). Development of a creativity scale for the Adjective Check List. Psychological Reports, 25, 87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R. S., and Rothenberg, A. (1980). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus separated visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 953–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Specher, T. B. (1964). Creativity and individual differences in criteria. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkweather, E. K. (1971). Creativity research instruments designed for use with preschool children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. W. (1958). Some variables functioning in productivity and creativity. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), The second (1957) University of Utah research conference on the identification of creative scientific talent. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. W., Smith, W. R., and Ghiselin, B. (1963). The creative and other contributions of one sample of research scientists. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. A., and Fish, R. A. (1979). The Creative Behaviour Disposition scale: A Canadian validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11, 95–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. A., Sutton, D., and Haworth, S. (1974). The measurement of creative transactualization: A scale to measure behavioral dispositions to creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 8, 114–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W., and Ellison, R. (1964). Predicting creative performances from multiple measures. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B., and Andersson, B. V. (1983). Construct validity of the divergent production subtests from the Structure-ofIntellect Learning Abilities Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 651–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 223229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press/ Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., Reynolds, C. R., Riegel, T., and Ball, O. E. (1977). “Your Style of Learning and Thinking” forms A and B: Preliminary norms, abbreviated technical notes, scoring keys, and selected references. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 563–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J., and Poggio, J. P. (1972). Needed research on the measurement of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J., Renzulli, J. S., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1971). Problems in the assessment of creative thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryk, H. E. (1968). Assessment of creativity. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 1 ). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., and Wing, C. (1969). The talented student: A validation of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbrown, F. H., and Huelsman, C. B. (1975). The validity of the Wallach-Kogan creativity operations for inner-city children in two areas of visual art. Journal of Personality, 43, 109–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallen, N. E., and Stevenson, G. M. (1960). Stability and correlates of judged creativity in fifth grade writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 273–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, W. C., and Cox, P. W. (1974). A field study of nonverbal creativity. Journal of Personality, 42, 202–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, G. (1959). Preliminary manual for the Welsh Figure Preference Test.. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, G. S. (1977). Personality correlates of intelligence and creativity in gifted adolescents. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, and C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K. (1963). Relationships between creative thinking abilities of teachers and achievement of pupils. Journal of Experimental Education, 32, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K. (1964a). Creativity and sociometric choice among adolescents. Journal of Social Psychology, 64, 249261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K. (1964b). Evaluation of some creativity measures in a high school with peer nominations as criteria. The Journal of Psychology, 58, 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnegar, Z., Hocevar, D., and Michael, W. (1988). Components of original thinking in gifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zegas, J. (1976). A validation study of tests from the divergent production plane of the Guilford Structure-of-Intellect model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, J. W., Guip, D., and Hocevar, D. (April 1988). Assessment of creativity—A longitudinal evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hocevar, D., Bachelor, P. (1989). A Taxonomy and Critique of Measurements Used in the Study of Creativity. In: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Handbook of Creativity. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3212-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5356-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics