Skip to main content

New Ideas and Techniques within Decision Aid

  • Chapter
Book cover ELECTRE and Decision Support

Abstract

A decision model strives to represent reality in a rational, logical, coherent and purposeful way. Its primary purpose, in the context of civil and environmental engineering, is to predict the consequences of proposed infrastructure projects. The output from the model can then be used to influence the opinions and decisions of the relevant actors. It is a tool used by the decision-makers to help achieve common set of agreed goals and objectives. It can thus be termed a construct. The model (or construct) in question may be the property of an individual, a group of individuals, a wider community such as the inhabitants of a major city or the general scientific community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bana e Costa, C. and Vansnick, J.C. (1997) ‘Applications of the MACBETH Approach in the Framework of an Additive Aggregation Model’. Journal ofMulticriteria Decision Analysis, 6: 2, pp 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maystre, L.Y. and Bollinger, D. (1999) Aide a la Negotiation Multicritere: Pratique et Conseils. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994) Environmental Indicators/Indicateurs de l’Environnement. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pictet, J, Maystre, L.Y. and Simos, J. (1994) “SURMESURE: An Instrument for Representation and Interpretation of ELECTRE and PROMETHEE Method Results”, in Paruccini (ed), Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision toEnvironmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Collection “Eurocourses”, Dordrecht, pp. 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M.G. and Bruen, M.P. (1995). “Non-Monetary Based Decision-Aid Techniques in EIA — An Overview”. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Municipal Engineer, Vol. 109, pp 98–103, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers M.G., and Bruen, M.P. (1998) “Qualitatively Assessed Criteria within Outranking methods”. Stream Title - Qualitative assessment within MCDA, Session MD, EURO XVI, 16 th European Conference on Operational Research, Brussels, 12th to 15th July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, M., Bruen, M., Maystre, LY. (2000). New Ideas and Techniques within Decision Aid. In: ELECTRE and Decision Support. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5057-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5108-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5057-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics