Skip to main content

Inhibiting DNA Repair — Models, Manipulations and Misconceptions

  • Chapter
DNA Damage and Repair
  • 132 Accesses

Abstract

The repair of DNA damage is very much a minor activity in terms of the cellular resources devoted to it. This means that investigating the biochemistry of DNA repair is rather like looking for a needle in a haystack. Consequently, in attempts to account for the mechanism of nucleotide excision repair there has been undue reliance on guesswork and extrapolation. Only recently, with the cloning of bacterial DNA repair genes and the synthesis of gene products in substantial quantities, has it been possible to work out the details of excision repair in Escherichia coli — and, as we know, the conventional model has proven wrong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cleaver, J.E., 1969, Repair replication of mammalian cell DNA: effects of compounds that inhibit DNA synthesis or dark repair, Radiat. Res., 37: 334.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., 1987, Estimates of the rate of ligation during excision repair of ultraviolet-damaged DNA in mammalian cells, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 908: 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Black, D.T., and Waldren, C.A., 1987, Abortive DNA repair and enhanced mutagenesis following mutagen treatment of Chinese hamster Ade C cells in a state of purine deprivation, (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.R.S., Downes, C.S., and Johnson, R.T., 1980, Cell cycle-related variations in UV damage and repair capacity in Chinese hamster (CHO-K1) cells, J. Cell. Physiol. 103: 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.R.S., Downes, C.S., and Johnson, R.T., 1984, An integrated view of inhibited repair, in: “DNA Repair and its Inhibition”, A. Collins, C.S. Downes and R.T. Johnson, eds, IRL Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., and Johnson, R.T., 1979, Novobiocin; an inhibitor of the repair of UV-induced but not X-ray-induced damage in mammalian cells, Nucleic Acids Res. 7: 1311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.R.S., and Johnson, R.T., 1984, The inhibition of DNA repair, Adv. Radiat. Biol. 11: 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., and Oates, D.J., 1987, Hydroxyurea: effects on deoxyribonucleotide pool sizes correlated with effects on DNA repair in mammalian cells, European J. Biochem. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.R.S., Schor, S.L., and Johnson, R.T., 1977, The inhibition of repair in UV irradiated human cells, Mutat. Res., 42: 413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Creissen, D., and Shall, S., 1982, Regulation of DNA ligase activity by poly(ADP-ribose), Nature 296: 271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, C.S., Ord, M.J., Mullinger, A.M., Collins, A.R.S., and Johnson, R.T., 1985, Novobiocin inhibition of DNA excision repair may occur through effects on mitochondrial structure and ATP metablism, not on repair topoisomerases, Carcinogenesis 6: 1343.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.T., Collins, A.R.S., Squires, S., Mullinger, A.M., Elliott, G.C., Downes, C.S., and Rasko, I., 1987, DNA repair under stress, J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 6: 263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W.E., Short, J., and Lieberman, I., 1976, The 7.1S nuclear DNA polymerase and DNA replication in intact liver, Cancer Res. 36: 901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullinger, A.M., Collins, A.R.S., and Johnson, R.T., 1983, Cell growth state determines susceptibility of repair DNA synthesis to inhibition by hydroxyurea and 1- -D-arabinofuranosylcytosine, Carcinogenesis 4, 1039.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, P., 1972, Control of deoxyribonucleotide synthesis in vitro and in vivo, Adv. Enz. Regul., 10: 3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamato, T.D., Hinkle, L., Collins, A.R.S., and Waldren, C.A., 1981, Chinese hamster ovary mutant UV-1 is hypomutable and defective in a postreplication recovery process, Somat. Cell Genet., 7: 307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Th’ng, J.P.H., and Walker, I.G., 1986, Excision repair of DNA in the presence of aphidicolin, Mutat. Res., 165: 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L.H., Brookman, K.W., Dillehay, L.E., Mooney, C.L., and Carrano, A.V., 1982, Hypersenstivity to mutation and sister-chromatid exchange induction in CHO cell mutants defective in incising DNA containing UV lesions, Somat. Cell Genet. 8: 759.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, A. (1989). Inhibiting DNA Repair — Models, Manipulations and Misconceptions. In: Castellani, A. (eds) DNA Damage and Repair. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5016-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5016-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5018-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5016-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics