Skip to main content

The Social Scientist in Court

  • Chapter
  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

Every profession has its own conflicts of interests, ethical issues and relativities. As a sociologist and, more particularly, as a criminologist, I have encountered a few. Although they were not excessively troublesome and may not even have bothered some of my colleagues, they nevertheless did cause me to be cautious. Among such encounters were those related to my role as a social scientist testifying as an “expert witness” for civil rights causes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. F. Supp. 710 (E.D. Ark. 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Supp. 401 (S.D. Cal. 1970 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. iii See Wolfgang and Riedel, Race, Judicial Discretion, and the Death Penalty,in BLACKS AND THE LAW (J. Greenberg ed. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Meltsner CRUEL AND UNUSUAL, The SUPREME COURT AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Id. at 100–01.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Id. at 98.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, de Cani, The Role of the Statistician in Jury Discrimination Cases 65 J. CRIM. L. and C. 234 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. vii 257 F. Supp. 710 (E. D. Ark. 1966), cited by Meltsner supra note 4, at 322.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fora history of the use of the research data, see Meltsner supra note 4, at 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Chambliss and Nagasawa, On the Validity of Official Statistics-A Comparative Study of White, Black, and. Japanese High School Boys,6 J. Res. CRIME and DELINQUENCY 111 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972); G. MYRDAL, THE NEGRO PROBLEM AND MODERN DEMOCRACY (1962). Myrdal’s An American Dilemma (1944) is one of the important sociological studies referred to in Brown v. Board of Education, 347.U. S. 483, 495 n. 1l (1954).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolfgang, M.E. (2002). The Social Scientist in Court. In: Silverman, R.A., Thornberry, T.P., Cohen, B., Krisberg, B. (eds) Crime and Justice at the Millennium. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4883-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4883-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4930-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4883-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics