Skip to main content

The Backbone of Fractals: Feedback and the Iterator

  • Chapter
Chaos and Fractals

Abstract

When we think about fractals as images, forms or structures we usually perceive them as static objects. This is a legitimate initial standpoint in many cases, as for example if we deal with natural structures like the ones in figures 1.1 and 1.2.

The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, and if nature were not worth knowing, life would not be worth living.

Henri Poincaré

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Nature does not make radical jumps.

    Google Scholar 

  2. lt was proposed by Ralph Abraham from the University of California at Santa Cruz in the 1970’s. See R. Abraham, Simulation of cascades by video feedback,in: “Structural Stability, the Theory of Catastrophes, and Applications in the Sciences”, P. Hilton (ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 525, 1976, 10–14, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. NTSC is typically 30 frames per second at 480 lines per image.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Crutchfield, Space-time dynamics in video feedback, Physica 10D (1984) 229–245.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Filius (=son) of Bonacci

    Google Scholar 

  6. Two elaborate studies appeared in the Mémoires de l’Académie Royale de Belgique 1844 and 1847. 13R. M. May, Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics Nature 261 (1976) 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lorenz, E. N., Deterministic non-periodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci. 20 (1963) 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. In: H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, D. Saupe, C. Zahlten, Fractals An Animated Discussion, Video film, Freeman 1990. Also appeared in German as Fraktale in Filmen und Gesprächen, Spektrum der Wissenschaften Videothek, Heidelberg, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peitgen, HO., Jürgens, H., Saupe, D. (1992). The Backbone of Fractals: Feedback and the Iterator. In: Chaos and Fractals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4740-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4740-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4742-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4740-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics