Skip to main content

Abstract

The IRR is a measure of the percentage yield on investment. The IRR is compared against the investor’s minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR)1 to ascertain the economic attractiveness of the investment. If the IRR exceeds the MARR, the investment is economic. If it is less than the MARR, the investment is uneconomic. If the IRR equals the MARR, the investment’s benefits or savings just equal its costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Au, Tung, and Thomas P. Au. 1983. Engineering Economics for Capital Investment Analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaves, 1988. Net present value and rate of return: implicit and explicit reinvestment rate assumption. The Engineering Economist 33(4):275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Eugene L., and W. Grant Ireson. 1982. Principles of Engineering Economy. New York: The Ronald Press Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajdasinsk, Miroslaw M. 1988. On bounding the internal rates of return of a project. The Engineering Economist 33(3):235–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1958. On the theory of optimal investment decision. The Journal of Political Economy 66(4) : 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, Jack. R. 1988. The IRR, NPV and the fallacy of the reinvestment rate assumptions. The Engineering Economist 33(4):303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Harold E. 1986. Advantages of the adjusted rate of return. Cost Engineering 28(2):32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Harold E. 1983. Recommended Practice for Measuring Net Benefits and Internal Rates of Return for Investments in Buildings and Building Systems. NBSIR 83–2657. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Stephen L. 1989. What’s wrong with @IRR? Lotus, July, 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, Rosalie T. 1989 (in press). The internal rate of return and the reinvestment rate controversy: an attempt at clarification. Persistent Problems in Investment Appraisal. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Symposium Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, J. B. 1950. Numerical Mathematical Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruegg, R.T., Marshall, H.E. (1990). Internal Rate-of-Return (IRR). In: Building Economics: Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4688-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4688-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4690-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4688-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics