Skip to main content

Abstract

Measures of sensory acuity are obtained for varied reasons. For instance, an investigator may wish to know the effects of a drug, or a lesion, on the capacity of an animal to see, hear, or feel stimulation to which it is normally sensitive. More specifically, it is desirable to accurately assess the degree of sensory impairment resulting from some experimental treatment. Depending on the accuracy desired, the experimenter may choose an appropriate measurement technique from among a variety of procedures. No matter which technique is selected, however, the animal is always required to indicate it has detected a stimulus input by responding in some distinctive manner. Typically a cat may learn to move from one end of a box to the other when it hears a tone. Since past experience in the experimental chamber has shown the cat that failure to move during tone presentation resulted in painful electric shock, the cat usually learns to avoid shock by quickly moving across the box. Movement across the box during tone presentation is thus taken to indicate hearing. The tone may then be made progressively weaker until a signal level is reached to which the cat cannot respond, i.e., its threshold of hearing has been reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, H. E., and J. I. Dalland. 1959. Spectral thresholds in the starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 52:438–445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blough, D. S. 1956. Dark adaptation in the pigeon. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 49:425–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blough, D. S. 1966. The study of animal sensory processes by operant methods. In Honig, W. K., ed. Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 345–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clack, T. D., and P. N. Herman. 1963. A single-lever psychophysical adjustment procedure for measuring auditory thresholds in the monkey. J. Aud. Res., 3:175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalland, J. I. 1965a. Auditory thresholds in the bat: A behavioral technique. J. Aud. Res., 5:95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalland, J. I. 1965b. Hearing sensitivity in bats. Science, 150:1185–1186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalland, J. I. J. A. Vernon, and E. A. Peterson. 1967. Hearing and cochlear microphonic potentials in the bat Eptesicus fuscus J. Neurophysiol., 30:697–709.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, S. 1946. Die Sinneswelt der Fledermäuse. Experientia, 2:438–448.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, S. 1960. Spallanzani’s unpublished experiments of the sensory basis of object perception in bats. Isis, 51, part 1, 9–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. N. 1967. Effect of peripheral lesions on acuity and discrimination in animals. In Graham, A. B., ed. Sensorineural Hearing Processes and Disorders, Boston, Little, Brown and Company, pp. 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, R. 1942. The avoidance of obstacles by flying bats. Spallanzani’s ideas (1794) and later theories. Isis, 34:132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, G., M. H. Hack, and J. E. Hawkins. 1960. Auditory thresholds in the rat measured by an operant technique. Science, 131:1046–1047.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R.1958. Listening in the Dark, New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. J. J. G. McCue, and A. D. Grinnell. 1963. The resistance of bats to jamming. J. Exp. Zool., 152:229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, A. D.1963. The neurophysiology of audition in bats. J. Physiol. (London), 167:38–127.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., C. S. Watson, and W. P. Covell. 1963. Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Otolaryng. (Stockholm), Suppl. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, J. A., J. I. Dalland, and E. G. Wever. 1966. Further studies of hearing in the bat, Myotis lucifugus, by means of cochlear potentials. J. Aud. Res., 6:153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever, E. G. 1966. Electrical potentials of the cochlea. Physiol. Rev., 46:102–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever, E. G. and J. A. Vernon. 1961. Hearing in the bat, Myotis lucifugus, as shown by the cochlear potentials. J. Aud. Res., 1:158–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dalland, J.I. (1970). The Measurement of Ultrasonic Hearing. In: Stebbins, W.C. (eds) Animal Psychophysics: the design and conduct of sensory experiments. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4514-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4514-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4516-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4514-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics