Abstract
Two general sources of error in estimating equating relationships are present whenever equating is conducted using data from an equating study: random error and systematic error. Random equating error is present when the scores of examinees who are considered to be samples from a population or populations of examinees are used to estimate equating relationships. When only random equating error is involved in estimating equating relationships, the estimated equating relationship differs from the equating relationship in the population because data were collected from a sample, rather than from the whole population. If the whole population were available, then no random equating error would be present. Thus, the amount of random error in estimating equating relationships becomes negligible as the sample size increases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kolen, M.J., Brennan, R.L. (2004). Standard Errors of Equating. In: Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking. Statistics for Social Science and Public Policy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4310-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4310-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-2304-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4310-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive