Abstract
This chapter broadly summarizes some of the basic economic theory on the working of the patent system. It starts by outlining the role technology plays in economic development, and the way in which economic theory has approached the technology-economy relationship. It then reviews the basic economic motive for establishing a patent system: to solve the incentive problem that firms face when they develop new technologies with potential spillover effects to other firms and consumers. A discussion of alternatives to the patent system is also provided. From an economic point of view, however, a crucial aspect of patents is that they leave some opportunity for spillovers. In other words, patents should not provide a pure monopoly to the inventing firm.
The economic logic behind this argument is explained and some general (and abstract) theoretical guidelines are proposed to strike a balance between providing incentives (a legal monopoly for the inventor) and leaving opportunity for spillovers. The chapter concludes with a summary of the debates surrounding issues of patents (and IPRs more general) in an international context. The role patents may play in stimulating technology transfer is reviewed, but also critical remarks are made with respect to the ability of a strict patent system alone to achieve technological developments of the poorest nations.
An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the WIPO Arab Regional Symposium on the Economic Importance of Intellectual Property Rights, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, February 22–24, 1999. I thank participants at the conference and Eddy Szirmai for useful comments and discussions. The work for this chapter was sponsored by the Norwegian Research Council under the programme “Globalisering som transformativ kraft”, carried out by TIK.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature References
Abramovitz, M.A. (1979). ‘Rapid Growth Potential and its Realisation: The Experience of Capitalist Economies in the Postwar Period’. Economic Growth and Resources, Vol. I: The Major Issues. Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress of the International Economic Association. E. Malinvaud. London: Macmillan: 1–51.
Abramovitz, M.A. (1994). ‘The Origins of the Postwar Catch-Up and Convergence Boom’. In The Dynamics of Trade, Technology and Growth. J. Fagerberg, B. Verspagen and N. Von Tunzelmann (eds.). Aldershot: Edward Elgar: 21–52.
Acharya, R. (1995). The Impact of New Technologies on Economic Growth and Trade. A Case Study of Biotechnology. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Economics. Maastricht, University of Limburg.
Arundel, A. and G. Van de Paal (1995). ‘Innovation Strategies of Europe’s Largest Industrial Firms’. Maastricht, MERIT, unpublished manuscript.
Beck, R.L. (1981). ‘Competition for patent monopolies’. Research in Law and Economics 3:91–110.
Bucci, A. and H.C. Saglam (2000). ‘Growth Maximizing Patent Life-Time’. Discussion Paper no. 2000019, Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (1RES), Belgium.
Chin, J.C. and G.M. Grossman (1990). ‘Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade’. In The Political Economy of International Trade. Essays in Honour of Robert E. Baldwin. R.W. Jones and A.O. Krueger (eds.). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Coe, D.T., E. Helpman, et al. (1997). ‘North-South R&D Spillovers’. Economic Journal 107: 134–149.
Cornwall, J. (1977). Modern Capitalism. Its Growth and Transformation. London: Martin Robertson.
Dasgupta, P. and J.E. Stiglitz (1980). ‘Uncertainty, industrial structure and the speed of R&D’. Bell Journal of Economics 11: 1–28.
David, P.A. (1993). ‘Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda’s Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History’. Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. M.B. Wallerstein, M.E. Mogee and R.A. Schoen (eds.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: 19–64.
Deardorff, A.V. (1992). ‘Welfare effects of Global patent protection’. Economica 59: 35–51.
Denison, E. (1966). Why growth rates differ. Washington: Brookings Institution.
Diwan, I. and D. Rodrik (1991). ‘Patents, Appropiate Technology, and North-South Trade’. Journal of International Economics 30: 27–47.
European Commission (1998). The Second European Report on Science and Technology Indicators. Luxembourg/Brussels, European Commission, DG XII.
Fagerberg, J. and B. Verspagen (1998). ‘Productivity, R&D Spillovers and Trade’. ECIS Working Paper 98–1.
Freeman, C. and L. Soete (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. 3rd ed. London and Washington: Pinter.
Freeman, C. (1994). ‘Technological Revolutions and Catching-Up: ICT and the NICs’. In The Dynamics of Trade, Technology and Growth. J. Fagerberg, B. Verspagen and N. Von Tunzelmann (eds.). Aldershot: Edward Elgar: 198–221.
Frischtak, CR. (1993). ‘Harmonization versus Differentiation in Intellectual Property Rights Regimes’. In Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. M.B. Wallerstein, M.E. Mogee and R.A. Schoen (eds.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: 89–106.
Granstrand, O. (1999), The economics and management of intellectual property. Towards intellectual capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Griliches, Z. (1979). ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth’. The Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92–116.
Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Helpman, E. (1993). ‘Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights’. Econometrica 61: 1247–1280.
Jones, C. (1995). ‘R&D based models of economic growth’. Journal of Political Economy 103: 759–784.
Jorgenson, D.W. and Z. Griliches (1967). ‘Explanation of Productivity Change’. Review of Economic Studies 34: 249–283.
Kamien, M.I. and N.L. Schwartz (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kitch, E.W. (1977). ‘The nature and function of the patent system’. Journal of Law and Economics 20: 265–290.
Klemperer, P. (1990). ‘How broad should the scope of patent protection be?’ RAND Journal of Economics 21: 113–130.
Landes, D. (1969). The unbound Prometheus: Technological Change 1750 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, et al. (1987). ‘Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development’. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783–820.
Lichtenberg, F. and B. Van Pottelsberghe (1996). ‘International R&D Spillovers: A Re-Examination’. NBER Working Paper 5668.
Maddison, A. (1987). ‘Growth and Slowdown in Advanced Capitalist Economies: Techniques of Quantitative Assessment’. Journal of Economic Literature 25: 649–698.
Maddison, A. (1991). Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development. A Long-Run Comparative View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mansfield, E. (1993). ‘Unauthorized Use of Intellectual Property: Effects on Investment, Trechnology Transfer, and Innovation’. In Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. M.B. Wallerstein, M.E. Mogee and R.A. Schoen (eds.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: 107–145.
Mansfield, E. (1994). ‘Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer’. International Finance Corporation Discussion Paper 19.
Mansfield, E. (1995). ‘Intellectual Property Protection, Direct Investment and Technology Transfer: Germany, Japan and the United States’. International Finance Corporation Discussion Paper 27.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London.
Marx, K. (1981). Capital. Vol. 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Mazzoleni, R. and R.R. Nelson (1998). ‘The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate’. Research Policy 27: 273–284.
Merges, R.P. and R.R. Nelson (1990). ‘On the complex economies of patent scope’. Columbia Law Review 90: 839–916.
Mody, A. (1990), ‘New International Environment for Intellectual Property Rights’. In Intellectual Property Rights in Science, Technology and Economic Performance. F.W. Rushing and C. Ganz Brown (eds.). Boulder: Westview Press.
Nordhaus, W.D. (1969). Invention, Growth and Welfare. A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
O’Donoghue, T. and J. Zweimüller (1998), ‘Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth’. Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Economics Series no. 56.
Primo Braga, C. (1990). ‘Guidance from the economic theory’. In Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries. A Survey of the Literature. E.W. Siebeck (ed.). Washington D.C.: World Bank Discussion Paper no. 112.
Romer, P. (1986). ‘Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth’. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.
Scherer, F.M. and D. Ross (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Scotchmer, S. (1991). ‘Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 29–41.
Scotchmer, S. and J. Green (1990). ‘Novelty and disclosure in patent law’. RAND Journal of Economics 21: 131–146.
Sherwood, R.M. (1993). ‘Why a Uniform Intellectual Property System Makes Sense for the World’. In Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. M.B. Wallerstein, M.E. Mogee and R.A. Schoen (eds.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: 68–88.
Siebeck, W.E. (ed.) (1990). ‘Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature’. World Bank Discussion Paper 112. Washington D.C.
Soete, L. and B. Verspagen (1993). Technology and Growth: The Complex Dynamics of Catching Up, Falling Behind and Taking Over’. In Explaining Economic Growth. A. Szirmai, B. Van Ark and D. Pilat (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier: 101–127.
Solow, R.M. (1956). ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.
Taylor, C. and A. Silberston (1973). The Economic Impact of the Patent System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UNCTAD (1975). ‘The Role of the Patent System in the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries’. New York: United Nations.
Van Dijk, T. (1994). The Limits of Patent Protection. Essays on the Economics of Intellectual Property Rights. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Economics. Maastricht, University of Limburg.
Van Wijk, J. and G. Junne (1993). ‘Intellectual Property Protection of Advanced Technology. Changes in the Global Technology System: Implications and Options for Developing Countries’. Maastricht, UNU/Intech.
Verspagen, B. (1991). ‘A New Empirical Approach to Catching Up or Falling Behind’. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2: 359–380.
Wallerstein, M.B., M.E. Mogee and R.A. Schoen (eds.). (1993). Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
World Bank (1998). World Development Report. Knowledge for Development. 1998/1999. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yankey, G.S.-A. (1987). International Patents and Technology Transfer to Less Developed Countries. The case of Ghana and Nigeria. Aldershot: Avebury.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verspagen, B. (2003). Intellectual Property Rights in the World Economy. In: Granstrand, O. (eds) Economics, Law and Intellectual Property. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3750-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3750-9_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5416-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3750-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive