Skip to main content

Intellectual Property and the Information Economy

  • Chapter
Cyber Policy and Economics in an Internet Age

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 43))

  • 246 Accesses

Abstract

The pundits who prophesied that the Internet would mean the end of intellectual property were wrong.1 Intellectual property is alive and well on the Internet. Copyrights, trademarks, and lately even patents are the subjects of vigorous, and increasingly successful, enforcement efforts. From high-tech start-up profiles to law-firm hiring patterns, the evidence suggests that protection of online intellectual property is a growth industry. But this is not, to borrow a turn of phrase, your father’s intellectual property. This intellectual property is different. Traditional intellectual property rights, which were limited monopolies operating in distinct and different subject areas, have been retrofitted to become sophisticated, mutually reinforcing methods of controlling information use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayres, in, and Eric Talley. 1995. Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade. Yale Law Journal 104, no. 5 (March): 1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, John Perry. 1994. The Economy of Ideas: A Framework for Rethinking Patents and Copyrights in the Digital Age. Wired, March, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai. 2000a. Net Regulation: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Uni-versify of Colorado Law Review 71, no. 4 (Fall): 1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai, 2000b. Constitutional Bounds of Database Protection: The Role of Judicial Review in the Creation and Definition of Private Rights in Information. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14, no. 2 (Spring): 535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk, Dan L. 2000. The Trouble With Trespass. Journal of Small & Emerging Business Law4, no. 1 (spring): 27. http://http://www.clark.edu/org/jsebl/vol4nol.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, David D., and Marjory S. Blumenthal. 2000. Rethinking the Design of the Internet: The End to End Arguments vs. the Brave New World (working paper on file with author). Version for submission 10 August 2000 at Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, Virginia, http://http://www.tprc.org/abstracts00/rethinking.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Julie E. 1998. Copyright and the Jurisprudence of Self-Help. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 13, no. 3 (fall): 108. http://www.law.berkeley.edu v>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Julie E. Copyright and the Perfect Curve. 2000. Vanderbilt Law Review 53, no. 6

    Google Scholar 

  • (November): 1799. http://www.law.vanderbilt.edu/lawreview/vol536/cohen. pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Esther. 1995. Intellectual Value. Wired, July, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froomkin, A. Michael. 1999. Semi-Private International Rulemaking: Lessons Learned from the WIPO Domain Name Process. Version 2.0 (working paper on file with author), http://http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/TPRC99. pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Jane C. 2002. From Having Copies to Experiencing Works: The Development of an Access Right in U.S. Copyright Law. In U.S. Intellectual Property: Law and Policy, edited by Hugh Hansen. Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugenholtz, P. Bernt. 2001. The New Database Right: Early Case Law from Europe. http://http://www.ivir.nl/publications/hugenholtz/fordham2001 .html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Infrastructure Task Force, United States, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1995), http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/doc/ ipnii/ index.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinski, Alex. 1993. Trademarks Unplugged. New York University Law Review 68, no. 4 (October): 960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemley, Mark A., and Lawrence Lessig. 2001. The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era. UCLA Law Review 48, no. 4 (April): 925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach. Harvard Law Review 113, no. 2: 501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman, Jessica. 1999. Breakfast With Batman: The Public Interest in the Advertising Age. Yale Law Journal 108, no. 7 (May): 1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Milton. 2000. Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (working paper on file with author), http:// http://www.dcc.syr.edu/roughjustice.htm>.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, Maureen A. 2000. Shaping Competition on the Internet: Who Owns Product and Pricing Information? Vanderbilt Law Review 53, no. 6 (November): 1965. http://http://www.law.vanderbilt.edu/lawreview/vol536/orourke.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • An Imminent Constitutional Collision. George Washington Law Review 67, no. 2 (January): 359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, Margaret Jane. 2002. Online Standardization and the Integration of Text and Machine. Fordham Law Review 70, no. 4 (March): 1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, J.H., and Pamela Samuelson. 1997. Intellectual Property Rights in Data? Vanderbilt Law Review 50, no. 1 (January): 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Pamela, and John Browning. 1997. Confab Clips Copyright Cartel. Wired, March, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Pamela. 1990. Benson Revisited: The Case Against Patent Protection for Algorithms and Other Computer Program-Related Inventions. Emory Law Journal 39, no. 4 (fall): 1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, Mark. 1997. Shifting the Possible: How Trusted Systems and Digital Property Rights Challenge Us to Rethink Digital Publishing. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 12, no. 1 (spring): 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, John R. 1999. The Patenting of the Liberal Professions. Boston College Law Review 40, no. 5 (September): 1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, John R. 2001. Post-Industrial Patents and Personal Liberties (working paper on file with author).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, J.E. (2002). Intellectual Property and the Information Economy. In: Lehr, W.H., Pupillo, L.M. (eds) Cyber Policy and Economics in an Internet Age. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 43. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3575-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3575-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-3577-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3575-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics