Abstract
Money is shrinking. The money supply (M1) in the United States, as a fraction of the nominal value of GDP, has decreased about 70 per cent since 1952. Money has shrunk because the demand for money has fallen. Technological progress in the development of alternative means of payment, such as electronic payment systems, increased credit availability, and new cash management techniques have reduced the relative quantities of transactions measures of money held by households and businesses. Moreover, financial innovation is likely to continue, which suggests that money will become even less important as a medium of exchange in the future.
I thank Anders Vredin for very helpful suggestions on an earlier draft of this paper. I also thank Helena Matheou for helpful comments and assistance on the final draft.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blanchard, O.-J. and N. Kiyotaki (1987), Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand, American Economic Review 77, 647–66.
Christiano, L.J. (1991), Modeling the Liquidity Effect of a Money Shock, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 15, 3–34.
Christiano, L.J. and M. Eichenbaum (1992), Liquidity Effects and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism, American Economic Review 82, 346–353.
Christiano, L.J., M. Eichenbaum and C. Evans (1996), The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence From the Flow of Funds, Review of Economics and Statistics 78, 16–34.
Cole, H.L. and L.E. Ohanian (1999), The Demand for Money and the Nonneutrality of Money, Discussion Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Fuerst, T.S. (1992), Liquidity, Loanable Funds, and Real Activity, Journal of Monetary Economics 29, 3–24.
Fuerst, T.S. (1994), Optimal Monetary Policy in a Cash-in-Advance Economy, Economic Inquiry 32, 582–96.
Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1990), Liquidity and Interest Rates, Journal of Economic Theory 50, 237–64.
Lucas, RE. Jr. and N. Stokey (1987), Money and Interest in a Cash-in-Advance Economy, Econometrica 55, 491–514.
Mankiw, N.G. (1985), Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model, Quarterly Journal of Economics 10, 529–38.
Sims, C.A. (1996), Comments on Glenn Rudebusch’s ‘Do Measures of Monetary Policy Make Sense?’, Discussion Paper, Yale University.
Taylor, J.B. (1979), Staggered Wage Setting in a Macro Model, American Economic Review 69, 108–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ohanian, L.E. (2001). Shrinking Money and the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy. In: Santomero, A.M., Viotti, S., Vredin, A. (eds) Challenges for Central Banking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3306-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3306-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4891-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3306-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive