Abstract
The optimum management of lacerations requires knowledge of skin anatomy and the physiology of wound healing. Such knowledge facilitates proper management of wounds of varying depth and complexity. By understanding the healing process the family physician can maximize the options for repair and minimize the dangers of dehiscence and infection. The goals of primary closure are to stop bleeding, prevent infection, preserve function, and restore appearance. The patient always benefits from a physician who treats the patient gently, handles the tissue carefully, understands anatomy, and appreciates the healing process.1,2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brietenbach KL, Bergera JJ. Principles and techniques of primary wound closure. Prim Care 1986;13:411–31.
Snell G. Laceration repair. In: Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC, editors. Procedures for primary care physicians. St. Louis: Mosby, 1994:12–19.
Bonadio WA, Wagner V. Efficacy of TAC topical anesthetic for repair of pediatric lacerations. Am J Dis Child 1988; 142:203–5.
Hegenbarth MA, Altieri MF, Hawk WH, Green A, Ochsenschlager DW, O’Donnell R. Comparison of topical tetracaine, adrenaline, and cocaine anesthesia with lidocaine infiltration for repair of lacerations in children. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:63–7.
Matsumoto AH, Reifsnyder AC, Hartwell GD, Angle JF, Selby JB, Tegtmeyer CJ. Reducing the discomfort of lidocaine administration through pH buffering. J Vasc Intery Radiol 1994;5:171–5.
Bartfield JM, Ford DT, Homer PJ. Buffered versus plain lidocaine for digital nerve blocks. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:216–19.
Mader TJ, Playe SJ, Garb JL. Reducing the pain of local anesthetic infiltration: warming and buffering have a synergistic effect. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:550–4.
Brogan BX Jr, Giarrusso E, Hollander JE, Cassara G, Mararnga MC, Thode HC. Comparison of plain, warmed, and buffered lidocaine for anesthesia of traumatic wounds. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:121–5.
Murakami CS, Odland PB, Ross BK. Buffered local anesthetics and epinephrine degradation. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994;20:192–5.
Thompson KD, Welykyj S, Massa MC. Antibacterial activity of lidocaine in combination with a bicarbonate buffer. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993;19:216–20.
Ernst AA, Marvez-Valls E, Mall G, Patterson J, Xie X, Weiss SJ. 1% Lidocaine versus 0.5% diphenhydramine for local anesthesia in minor laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23:1328–32.
Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practical guidelines for sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 1996;84:459–71.
Qureshi FA, Mellis PT, McFadden MA. Efficacy of oral ketamine for providing sedation and analgesia to children requiring laceration repair. Pediatr Emerg Care 1995;11: 93–7.
Connors K, Terndrup TE. Nasal versus oral midazolam for sedation of anxious children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:1074–9.
Shane SA, Fuchs SM, Khine H. Efficacy of rectal midazolam for the sedation of preschool children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:1065–73.
Schutzman SA, Burg J, Liebelt E, et al. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the premedication of children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:1059–64.
Clinical considerations in the use of fentanyl oralet. North Chicago, IL: Abbott Laboratories, 1995:1–16.
Gamis AS, Knapp JF, Glenski JA. Nitrous oxide analgesia in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18: 177–81.
Moy RL, Lee A, Zolka A. Commonly used suture materials in skin surgery. Am Fam Physician 1991;44:2123–8.
Epperson WJ. Suture selection. In: Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC, editors. Procedures for primary care physicians. St Louis: Mosby, 1994:3–6.
Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992;18:785–95.
Jones JS, Gartner M, Drew G, Pack S. The shorthand vertical mattress stitch: evaluation of a new suture technique. Am J Emerg Med 1993;11:483–5.
Ditmars DM Jr. Finger tip and nail bed injuries. Occup Med 1989;4:449–61.
Edlich RF, Thacker JG, Silloway RF, Morgan RF, Rodeheaver GT. Scientific basis of skin staple closure. In: Haval Mutaz B,editor. Advances in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Chicago: Year Book, 1986:233–71.
Osmond MH, Klassen TP, Quinn JV. Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations. J Pediatr 1995;126(6):892–5.
Quinn JV, Drzewiecki A, Li MM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing tissue adhesive with suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22: 1130–5.
Applebaum JS, Zalut T, Applebaum D. The use of tissue adhesive for traumatic laceration repair in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1190–2.
Fisher AA. Reactions to cyanoacrylate adhesives: “instant glue.” Cutis 1995:18–22,46,58.
Lewis KT, Stiles M. Management of cat and dog bites. Am Fam Physician 1995;52:479–85.
Centers for Disease Control. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep MMWR 1991 Aug 8;40(RR-10):1–28.
Richardson JP, Knight AL. The management and prevention of tetanus. J Emerg Med 1993;11:737–42.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, B., Snell, G.F. (1998). Care of Acute Lacerations. In: Taylor, R.B., David, A.K., Johnson, T.A., Phillips, D.M., Scherger, J.E. (eds) Family Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2947-4_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2947-4_49
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2949-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2947-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive