Skip to main content

Stochastic Dominance and Diversification

  • Chapter
Stochastic Dominance

Part of the book series: Studies in Risk and Uncertainty ((SIRU,volume 12))

  • 139 Accesses

Abstract

Stochastic dominance (SD) rules are applicable in selection between mutually exclusive investments but, unlike the mean-variance rule, they cannot identify all possible efficient diversification strategies. Thus, SD rules can tell us whether investment F dominates investment G, or investment G dominates H, but they cannot provide us with the set of combinations of these three assets that dominate all other sets of combinations. Moreover, for two investments F and G, even if it is given that F dominates G, say by SSD, when diversification is considered, one cannot tell unequivocally whether this SSD implies that more than 50% of the wealth should be invested by all risk averters in the superior investment F. Analysis of SD and diversification has been attempted but much still has to be accomplished in this area of research. In this chapter we first discuss some published results obtained in this area, and then we will report some new results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Arrow, J.K., Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, Markam Publishing Company, Chicago, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tobin, J., “Liquidity Preferences as Behavior Toward Risk,” Review of Economic Studies, 25, 1958, pp. 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy, H., “The Demand for Assets Under Conditions of Risk,” Journal of Finance, 28, March 1973, pp. 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn, P.C., and R.B. Porter, “Optimal Portfolios with One Safe and One Risky Asset: Effects of Changes in Rates of Return and Risk,” Management Science, 22, 1976, pp. 1064–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kira, D. and W.T. Ziemba, “The Demand for Risky Assets,” Management Science, 26, 1980, pp. 1158–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadar, J. and T.K. Seo, “Asset Proportions in Optimal Portfolios,” Review Economic Studies, 55, 1988, pp. 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadar, J. and T.K. Seo, “The Effects of Shifts in a Return Distribution on Optimal Portfolio,” International Economic Review, 31, 1990, pp. 721–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Landsberger, M. and I. Meilijson, “Demand for Risky Financial Assets: A Portfolio Analysis,” Journal Economic Theory, 12, 1976, pp. 483–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy, H., and Markowitz, H.M., “Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance,” American Economic Review, 69, No. 3, June 1979, pp. 308–317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy, H. (1998). Stochastic Dominance and Diversification. In: Stochastic Dominance. Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2840-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2840-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2842-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2840-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics