Skip to main content

Clinical Indications for Bone Densitometry

  • Chapter
  • 64 Accesses

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Practice ((CCP))

Abstract

There is no question that the variety of densitometry techniques available to the physician today can accurately and precisely quantify the bone density at virtually any skeletal site. But when should these technologies be used? In what clinical circumstances should physicians consider measuring the bone density? Four major organizations have published guidelines on the use of bone mass measurements. As practice guidelines, they are intended to help the physician determine when a bone mass measurement may be useful in the care of individual patients. A fifth major organization has published guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, based on the absolute level of the bone density or bone mass that is measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Johnston CC, Melton LJ, Lindsay R, Eddy DM (1989) Clinical indications for bone mass measurements. A report from the scientific advisory board of the National Osteoporosis Foundation. JBone Miner Res 4: S2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller PD, Bonnick SL, Rosen CJ (1996) Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurement in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population. Calcif Tissue Int 58: 207–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, et al. (1993) Bone density at various sites for the prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341: 72–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Metlon LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1993) Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8: 1227–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gardsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE, Gullberg B (1993) Predicting various fragility fractures in women by forearm bone densitometry: a follow-up study. Calcif Tissue Int 52: 348–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hodgson SF, Johnston CC (1996) AACE clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 2: 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis J, Devogelaer J, Gennari C (1996) Practical guide for the use of bone mineral measurements in the assessment of treatment of osteoporosis: a position paper of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporosis Int 6: 256–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1989) Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med 111: 355–361.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Drinka PJ, DeSmet AA, Bauwens SF, Rogot A (1992) The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 50: 507–510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frye MA, Melton LJ, Bryant SC, Fitzpatrick LA, Wahner HW, Schwartz RS, Riggs BL (1992) Osteoporosis and calcification of the aorta. Bone Miner 19: 185–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Ribot C (1993) The effects of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine. Calcif Tissue Int 52: 340–343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. He YF, Davis JW, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1993) Declining bone loss rate variability with increasing follow-up time. Bone Miner 21: 119–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Melton LJ, Richelson LS, Judd HL, Offord KP (1986) Rates of bone loss in the appendicular and axial skeletons of women: evidence of substantial vertebral bone loss before menopause. J Clin Invest 77: 1487–1491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mautalen C, Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Fromm G (1990) Bone diminution of osteoporotic females at different skeletal sites. Calcif Tissue Int 46: 217–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonnick SL, Nichols DL, Sanborn CF, Lloyd K, Payne SG, Lewis L, Reed CA (1997) Dissimilar spinal and femoral z-scores in premenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 61: 263–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Ribot C (1993) Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis? Calcif Tissue Int 52: 344–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lai K, Rencken M, Drinkwater BL, Chesnut CH (1993) Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision. Calcif Tissue Int 53: 225–228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Davis JW, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1994) Evidence for both generalized and regional low bone mass among elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 9: 305–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenspan SL, Maitland-Ramsey L, Myers E (1996) Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis. Calcif Tissue Int 58: 409–414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rupich RC, Griffin MG, Pacifici R, Avioli LV, Susman N (1992) Lateral dual-energy radiography: artifact error from rib and pelvic bone. J Bone Miner Res 7: 97–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mazess RB, Barden HS (1990) Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women. Bone Miner 11: 347–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonnick, S.L. (1998). Clinical Indications for Bone Densitometry. In: Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice. Current Clinical Practice. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2780-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2780-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2782-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2780-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics