Skip to main content

Support for Workflow Process Collaboration

  • Chapter
Mechanical Design: Theory and Methodology
  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

Global competition has created a tremendous need to streamline the total collection of activities (or the workflow process) by which high-quality products are designed, maintained, and serviced. To meet this need, companies are embarking on practices like integrated product-process design and team-oriented management. These practices attempt to identify and address different types of constraints early during design to reduce problems and iterations in “downstream” activities. Numerous individuals must then apply these practices when developing each product component. Given that various disciplines and departments are also involved, the problem of managing the workflow process is quite complex. Furthermore, existing applications developed over the years must somehow be leveraged in any solution. A fundamental challenge addressed here is to develop process-driven information systems to actively assist the way in which each worker, within each department or job category, performs each one of these activities correctly. By ensuring correctness and timeliness within the context of the overall workflow process, dramatic cost and cycle-time reductions are achievable while producing quality products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Computer supported cooperative work. Communications of The ACM,34(12).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almy, D., and Ramanathan, J. “Enterprise Workflow Management: Implementation and Observations.” IDEF Users Group Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Althoff, J. L. CPIM. An implementation of the ANSI/SPARC threeschema architecture. Conference Reading, Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Open system architecture for CIM. ESPRIT Consortium AMICE (Eds.). New York: Springer Verlag: Project 688, AMICE, Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashok, V. A knowledge-based software development assistant. DECUS Symposium, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blattner, M., and Ramanathan, J. Attributed meta-forms for high level design and analysis of algorithms. Proceedings of the Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, April.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buffum, H. E. Air force computer-aided manufacturing (AFCAM) master plan. Volume III Analytic Tools, AFML-TR-74–104, AFWAL/MLT, WPAFB, OH 45433, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A framework for concurrent engineering. CALS Technical Report 003, CALS Industry Steering Group, Suite 300, 1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington DC 20036, Tel. (202) 775–1440, Report of the CE Framework Task Group of the CALS/CE Industry Steering Group, CALS TR 003 March 13, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chandrasekaran, B., and T. R. Johnsonson. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery,35(9), 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, P. P. S. The entity-relationship model: Towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions, Database Systems,1(1), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Codd, E. F. Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning. ACM Transactions, Database Systems,4(4), 395–434.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis, B. Process modeling. Communications of the ACM,35(9).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Enterprise integration framework workshop briefing. IBM Federal Sector Division, Route 17C, Owego, NYB827–1298, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisksel, J., and Kayes-Roth, F. Knowledge systems for planning support. Cimflex Teknowledge Corporation, IEEE Expert, Fall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, A., and Madnick, S. Knowledge-based integrated information systems development methodologies plan. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Knowledge-based Integrated Information Systems Engineering (KBIISE) Report, Vol. 2, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hars, A., and Scheer, A.-W. Extending data modeling to cover the whole enterprise. Communications of the ACM, 35(9).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Information Resource Dictionary System. ANSI X3H4, Working Draft, ATIS, October, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ishii, H. Toward an open-shared workspace: Computer and video fusion approach of team workstation. Communications of the ACM, 34(12)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kannapan, S. M. Structuring and coordinating information in product development.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Knowledge integrated design system, WRDC, Contract No. F33615–89-C-5619,1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klein, M. Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering terms. Computer, 226(1),39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krasner, H. Lessons learned from a software process modeling system. Communications of the ACM,35(9).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kyung, M. Designing for cooperation. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery,34(12), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mayer, R. J. Ed. Analysis of methods. Knowledge-based Systems Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas AandM University, College Station, Texas, 77843, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mayer, R. J. Information integration for concurrent engineering (IICE). IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report, AL-TR-1992–0057, Knowledge-based Systems Incorporated, 2726 Longmire, College Station, Texas 77845, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Monarchi. A research typology for object-oriented analysis and design. Communications of the ACM, 35(9), September, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Navathe, S. B. The evolution of data modeling for databases. Communications of the ACM, 35(9), 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramana, Y. V. Reddy, Srinivas, K., Jagannathan, V., and Karinthi, R. Computer support for concurrent engineering. Computer, 26(1).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ramanathan, J. Knowledge-based assistance for design-in-the- large. Second International Symposium on Knowledge Engineering, Spain, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ramanathan, J. Process versus data management technologies. Conference Proceedings, Autofact, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, P.O. Box 930, Dearborn, MI, 48121, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ramanathan, J. Object-based integrated design workstation. Final Technical Report, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ramanathan, J., and Sarkar, S. Providing customized assistance for life-cycle approaches. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE 14(6),749–758.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ross, D. T. Structured analysis (SA): A language for communicating ideas. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sarkar, S. The design of a software environment architecture based on executable process descriptions. The Ohio State University, Computer and Information Sciences Department, 2036 Neil Avenue Mall, Columbus, Ohio 43210, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seybold, P. B. Office Computing Group Report, Vol. 15, No. 9, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS) Program, Software Process Tools and Techniques Evaluation Report, Version 1.0, Contract No. F19628–88-D-0032, ESD/AVS, Electronic Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, Hanscom Air Force Base, MA 01731–5000, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Functional Process Improvement, DOD 8020.1–M, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC 203013040. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, Commercial Telephone: 1–703–4874650, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Waldron, M. B. Modeling of the design process. In Yoshikawwa and Gossard (Eds.), Proceedings of IFIP Working Group 5.2 Workshop on Intelligent CAD. North Holland, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. A time sequence study of complex mechanical system design. Design Studies, 0142–694X18810209512, Butterworth and Company (Publishers) Ltd., Vol. 9, No. 2, April, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Williams, T. J. The purdue reference model for computer integrated manufacturing from the viewpoint of industrial automation. SME Conference Proceedings, 1990 Update Standards in Industrial Automation Status and Future, May 14–16, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  41. DAPro project integrated information support system (IISS) enterprise integration framework. Technical Report Prepared by Control Data Corporation for Manufacturing Technology Directorate, WRDC, Air Force Systems Command, WPAFB, Dayton, Ohio, Vol. V, Part 50, September 30, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramanathan, J. (1996). Support for Workflow Process Collaboration. In: Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (eds) Mechanical Design: Theory and Methodology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2563-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2561-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics