Abstract
Global competition has created a tremendous need to streamline the total collection of activities (or the workflow process) by which high-quality products are designed, maintained, and serviced. To meet this need, companies are embarking on practices like integrated product-process design and team-oriented management. These practices attempt to identify and address different types of constraints early during design to reduce problems and iterations in “downstream” activities. Numerous individuals must then apply these practices when developing each product component. Given that various disciplines and departments are also involved, the problem of managing the workflow process is quite complex. Furthermore, existing applications developed over the years must somehow be leveraged in any solution. A fundamental challenge addressed here is to develop process-driven information systems to actively assist the way in which each worker, within each department or job category, performs each one of these activities correctly. By ensuring correctness and timeliness within the context of the overall workflow process, dramatic cost and cycle-time reductions are achievable while producing quality products.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Computer supported cooperative work. Communications of The ACM,34(12).
Almy, D., and Ramanathan, J. “Enterprise Workflow Management: Implementation and Observations.” IDEF Users Group Conference.
Althoff, J. L. CPIM. An implementation of the ANSI/SPARC threeschema architecture. Conference Reading, Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
Open system architecture for CIM. ESPRIT Consortium AMICE (Eds.). New York: Springer Verlag: Project 688, AMICE, Vol. 1.
Ashok, V. A knowledge-based software development assistant. DECUS Symposium, 1987.
Blattner, M., and Ramanathan, J. Attributed meta-forms for high level design and analysis of algorithms. Proceedings of the Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, April.
Buffum, H. E. Air force computer-aided manufacturing (AFCAM) master plan. Volume III Analytic Tools, AFML-TR-74–104, AFWAL/MLT, WPAFB, OH 45433, 1981.
A framework for concurrent engineering. CALS Technical Report 003, CALS Industry Steering Group, Suite 300, 1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington DC 20036, Tel. (202) 775–1440, Report of the CE Framework Task Group of the CALS/CE Industry Steering Group, CALS TR 003 March 13, 1991.
Chandrasekaran, B., and T. R. Johnsonson. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery,35(9), 124–136.
Chen, P. P. S. The entity-relationship model: Towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions, Database Systems,1(1), 9–36.
Codd, E. F. Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning. ACM Transactions, Database Systems,4(4), 395–434.
Curtis, B. Process modeling. Communications of the ACM,35(9).
Enterprise integration framework workshop briefing. IBM Federal Sector Division, Route 17C, Owego, NYB827–1298, 1990.
Fisksel, J., and Kayes-Roth, F. Knowledge systems for planning support. Cimflex Teknowledge Corporation, IEEE Expert, Fall, 1989.
Gupta, A., and Madnick, S. Knowledge-based integrated information systems development methodologies plan. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Knowledge-based Integrated Information Systems Engineering (KBIISE) Report, Vol. 2, 1987.
Hars, A., and Scheer, A.-W. Extending data modeling to cover the whole enterprise. Communications of the ACM, 35(9).
Information Resource Dictionary System. ANSI X3H4, Working Draft, ATIS, October, 1991.
Ishii, H. Toward an open-shared workspace: Computer and video fusion approach of team workstation. Communications of the ACM, 34(12)
Kannapan, S. M. Structuring and coordinating information in product development.
Knowledge integrated design system, WRDC, Contract No. F33615–89-C-5619,1990.
Klein, M. Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering terms. Computer, 226(1),39–47.
Krasner, H. Lessons learned from a software process modeling system. Communications of the ACM,35(9).
Kyung, M. Designing for cooperation. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery,34(12), 65–73.
Mayer, R. J. Ed. Analysis of methods. Knowledge-based Systems Laboratory, Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas AandM University, College Station, Texas, 77843, 1989.
Mayer, R. J. Information integration for concurrent engineering (IICE). IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report, AL-TR-1992–0057, Knowledge-based Systems Incorporated, 2726 Longmire, College Station, Texas 77845, 1993.
Monarchi. A research typology for object-oriented analysis and design. Communications of the ACM, 35(9), September, 1992.
Navathe, S. B. The evolution of data modeling for databases. Communications of the ACM, 35(9), 112–123.
Ramana, Y. V. Reddy, Srinivas, K., Jagannathan, V., and Karinthi, R. Computer support for concurrent engineering. Computer, 26(1).
Ramanathan, J. Knowledge-based assistance for design-in-the- large. Second International Symposium on Knowledge Engineering, Spain, 1987.
Ramanathan, J. Process versus data management technologies. Conference Proceedings, Autofact, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, P.O. Box 930, Dearborn, MI, 48121, 1992.
Ramanathan, J. Object-based integrated design workstation. Final Technical Report, 1993.
Ramanathan, J., and Sarkar, S. Providing customized assistance for life-cycle approaches. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE 14(6),749–758.
Ross, D. T. Structured analysis (SA): A language for communicating ideas. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Sarkar, S. The design of a software environment architecture based on executable process descriptions. The Ohio State University, Computer and Information Sciences Department, 2036 Neil Avenue Mall, Columbus, Ohio 43210, 1989.
Seybold, P. B. Office Computing Group Report, Vol. 15, No. 9, 1992.
Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS) Program, Software Process Tools and Techniques Evaluation Report, Version 1.0, Contract No. F19628–88-D-0032, ESD/AVS, Electronic Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, Hanscom Air Force Base, MA 01731–5000, 1991.
Functional Process Improvement, DOD 8020.1–M, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC 203013040. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, Commercial Telephone: 1–703–4874650, 1993.
Waldron, M. B. Modeling of the design process. In Yoshikawwa and Gossard (Eds.), Proceedings of IFIP Working Group 5.2 Workshop on Intelligent CAD. North Holland, 1988.
Waldron, M. B., and Waldron, K. J. A time sequence study of complex mechanical system design. Design Studies, 0142–694X18810209512, Butterworth and Company (Publishers) Ltd., Vol. 9, No. 2, April, 1988.
Williams, T. J. The purdue reference model for computer integrated manufacturing from the viewpoint of industrial automation. SME Conference Proceedings, 1990 Update Standards in Industrial Automation Status and Future, May 14–16, 1990.
DAPro project integrated information support system (IISS) enterprise integration framework. Technical Report Prepared by Control Data Corporation for Manufacturing Technology Directorate, WRDC, Air Force Systems Command, WPAFB, Dayton, Ohio, Vol. V, Part 50, September 30, 1990.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramanathan, J. (1996). Support for Workflow Process Collaboration. In: Waldron, M.B., Waldron, K.J. (eds) Mechanical Design: Theory and Methodology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2561-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2563-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2561-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive