Skip to main content

How Do You Formulate a Testable Exciting Hypothesis?

  • Chapter

Abstract

The first reaction of many reviewers to a research proposal or a journal article is either excitement or boredom. If the proposal is boring, they may approve it, but they are unlikely to vote a high rating. In almost any science a necessary but not sufficient condition for something to be important—which in this context means being fundable, being reportable in good scientific journals, and perhaps having an impact on the field—is that it is exciting. Thus, my first advice about getting proposals funded is to talk to friends in the field about your research idea and evaluate their reactions. Your proposal should elicit excitement; if it does not, you should think more about your ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Carroll, J., Wiener, R. L., Coates, D., Galegher, J., & Alibrio, J. J. 1982. Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. Law and Society Review 35; 199–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. 1971. A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist 26, 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. 1974. Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 81, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. 1989. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243: 1668–1674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., & Feeney, G. J. 1968. The importance of the data-generating model in probability estimation. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 42, 62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, P. 1972. The biggest public health experiment ever. 1954 field trial of the Salk poliomyelitis vaccine. In J. M. Tanur, F. Mosteller, W. H. Kruskal, R. F. Link, R. S. Pieters, & G. R. Rising (eds.), Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown. San Francisco: Holden-Day, pp. 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dawes, R. (1995). How Do You Formulate a Testable Exciting Hypothesis?. In: Pequegnat, W., Stover, E. (eds) How to Write a Successful Research Grant Application. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2393-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2393-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44965-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2393-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics