Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Gender, Interaction, and Inequality pp 50–80Cite as

The Look of Power: Gender Differences and Similarities in Visual Dominance Behavior

  • Chapter

Abstract

The concept of social power has, at its core, the ability of one person to influence one or more others or to control the outcomes of others (Ellyson & Dovidio, 1985). Social power may stem from the information a person possesses (informational power), the position that a person occupies (legitimate power), the ability to administer favorable outcomes (reward power) or unfavorable outcomes (coercive power), or from the perception of being knowledgeable in the topic at hand (expert power) (French & Raven, 1959; Raven, 1974). These sources of social power may also be referred to as structural power (see Molm & Hedley, Chapter 1 in this volume). Sex is a characteristic that has traditionally been related to actual and perceived social power. In the United States, men disproportionately occupy positions of social, political, and economic power relative to women (Basow, 1986). In addition, gender stereotypes, in the United States and cross-culturally, characterize men as having greater potency, competence, and strength and associate men with higher status and more instrumental roles (Deaux, 1984; Williams & Best, 1986). This chapter examines the relationships among social power, gender, and human nonverbal power displays, particularly involving visual behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyle, M., and Ingham, R. (1972). Gaze, mutual glance, and proximity. Semiotica, 6, 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, M. and Snodgrass, S.E. (1989). Women’s assumption of leadership with men on masculine and feminine tasks. Proceedings and Abstracts of the 1989 Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Vol. 60. Glassboro, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Traditions and alternatives ( 2nd ed. ). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Cohen, B.P., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S.J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Wagner, D.G., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1985). Introduction: Expectation states theory. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 1–72 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I.S. (1970). Primate status hierarchies. In L.A. Rosenblum (Ed.), Primate behavior: Developments in field and laboratory research (Vol. 1, pp. 71–109 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I.K., Vogel, S.R., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., and Rosenkrantz, P.S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.E., Dovidio, J.F., and Ellyson, S.L. (1990a). Reducing sex differences in visual displays of dominance: Knowledge is power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.E., Dovidio, J.F., and Ellyson, S.L. (1990b). Visual dominance behavior of women in same-and mixed-sex interactions. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Wittenberg University, Springfield, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., and Geis, F.L. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camras, L. (1980). Animal threat displays and children’s facial expressions: A comparison. In D.R. Omark, F.F. Strayer, and D.G. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction (pp. 121–136 ). New York: Garland STPM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capella, J.N. (1985). Controlling the floor in conversation. In A.W. Siegman and S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 69103 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, W. (1958). The psychiatric hospital as a small society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., Drinkard, J., and McGavin, L. (1984). The effects of target, age, and gender on use of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1391–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J.M., and Fazio, R.H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.D. (1978). When boy meets girl: Sex roles and the negotiation of intimacy in an acquaintance exercise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 684–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1979). Self-evaluations of male and female managers. Sex Roles, 5, 571–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., and Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denmark, F. (1980). Psyche: From rocking the cradle to rocking the boat. American Psychologist, 35, 1057–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., and Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational influence upon individual behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R.L. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review, 10, 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R.L. (1987). Problems and progress of women in management. In K.S. Koziara, M.H. Moskow, and L.D. Tanner (Eds.), Working women: Past, present, and future (pp. 118–153 ). Washington, DC: BNA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittman, A.T. (1972). Interpersonal messages of emotion. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J.F., Brown, C.E., Heitman, K., Ellyson, S.L., and Keating, C.F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked topics: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J.F., and Ellyson, S.L. (1982). Decoding visual dominance: Attributions of power based on relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45 (2), 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J.F., and Ellyson, S.L. (1985). Patterns of visual dominance behavior in humans. In S.L. Ellyson and J.F. Dovidio (Eds.) Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–150 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J.F., Ellyson, S.L., Keating, C.F., Heltman, K., and Brown, C. (1988). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 233–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., and Auster, E.R. ( 1987, Summer). Wage differences between men and women: Performance appraisal ratings versus salary allocation as the locus of bias. Human Resource Management, 26, 157–168. 3. The Look of Power 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H., and Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M.S., Omark, D.R., and Freedman, D.G. (1971). Dominance hierarchies in children. Unpublished manuscript, Committee on Human Development, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P.C., Carlsmith, J.M., and Henson, A. (1972). The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: A series of field experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S.L., and Dovidio, J.F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In S.L. Ellyson and J.F. Dovidio (Eds.) Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–28 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., and Corson, R. (1981). Visual behavior differences as a function of self-perceived expertise. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 16 2168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Corson, R.C., and Vinicur, D. (1980). Visual dominance behavior in female dyads: Situational and personality factors. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43 (3), 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Halberstadt, A.G., and Brown, C.E. (1990). Nonverbal and verbal power displays between men and women. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. (1972). Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr, and B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress. (Vol. 2, pp. 38–87 ). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskilson, A., and Wiley, M.G. (1976). Sex composition and leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 39, 183–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etaugh, C., and Kasley, H.C. (1981). Evaluating competence: Effects of sex, marital status, and parental status. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 196203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etaugh, C., and Riley, S. (1983). Evaluating competence of women and men: Effects of marital and parental status and occupational sex-typing. Sex Roles, 9, 943–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R.V., Ellyson, S.L., and Long, B. (1975). Visual behavior as an aspect of power-role relationships. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, and T. Alloway (Eds.) Nonverbal communication of aggression (pp. 21–53 ). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R.V., Gray, D., and Schuette, D. (1965). Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content and sex of respondent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., and Peplau, L.A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidell, L.S. (1976). Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. In R. Unger and F. Denmark (Eds.), Women: Dependent or independent variable (pp. 779–782 ). New York: Psychological Dimensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M. (1982). Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women. Sex Roles, 8, 891–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J.R., and Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167 ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I.H., Olson, J.E., and Good, D.C. (1990). Perceived and actural discrimination in the salaries of male and female managers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 46–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I.H., and Ramsey, S.J. (1976). Nonverbal maintenance of traditional sex roles. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, E.P., and Garber, D.M. (1983). Sex bias in hiring: Effects of job demands an applicant competence. Sex Roles, 9, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givens, D.B. (1978). The nonverbal basis of attraction: Flirtation, courtship, and seduction. Psychiatry, 41, 346–349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, A.G., and Saitta, M.B. (1987). Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. (1985). Male and female nonverbal behavior. In A.W. Siegman and S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 195225 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A. (1987). On explaining gender differences: The case of nonverbal communication. In P. Shaver and C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender: Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 7. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M.J., and Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M.J., and Rosenthal, R. (1986). Four factors in the mediation of teacher expectancy effects. In R.S. Feldman (Ed.), The social psychology of education: Current research and theory (pp. 91–114 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M.E. (1984). Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination: The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary decisions. Organizational Psychology and Human Performance, 26, 386–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hembroff, L.A., and Myers, D.E. (1984). Status characteristics: Degrees of task relevance and the decision process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N.M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenctice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N.M., and Harmon, S. (1985). The nonverbal semantics of power and gender: A perceptual study. In. S.L. Ellyson and J.F. Dovidio (Eds.) Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 151–164 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillabrant, W. (1974). The influence of locomotion and gaze direction on perceptions of interacting persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 237–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A. (1974). Biological basis of human social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A., and Turner, J.C. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self stereotyping, and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340. 3. The Look of Power 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A., and Bray, D.W. (1988). Managerial lives in transition. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.A., Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instone, D., Major, B., and Bunker, B.B. (1983). Gender, self confidence, and social influence strategies: An organizational simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 322–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C.F. (1985). Human dominance signals: The primate in us. In S.L. Ellyson and J.F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 89–108 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, C.E., and Musgrove, J.I. (1988). Dominance in arguing mixed-sex dyads: Visual dominance patterns, talking time, and speech loudness. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M., and Wilkerson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C.L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linkey, H.E., and Firestone, I.J. ( 1986, August). Dominance: Nonverbal behaviors, personality trait, and interaction outcome. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E.E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, B.F., and Weitzel-O’Neill, P.A. (1985). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 379–405 ). San Francisco: JosseyBass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P., Dovidio, J.F., Gibbs, R., Miller, K., Huray, K., Ellyson, S.L., and Brown, C.E. ( 1989, April). Sex differences in the expression of power motives through visual dominance behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G., and Maple, T.L. (1985). Dominance in nonhuman primates. In S.L. Ellyson and J.F. Dovidio (Eds.) Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 49–66 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A.M., and Von Glinow, M.A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Mullen, B., and Rosenthal, R. (1985). BASIC meta-analysis: Procedures and programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., Salas, E., and Driskell, J.E. (1989). Salience, motivation, and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 545–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelton, S., and Berney, K. (1987, May). Women: The second wave. Nation’s Business, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, V.E. (1974). Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 809–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pheterson, G.S., Kiesler, S.B., and Goldberg, P. (1971). Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, personal history, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G.N. (1988). Women and men in management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, B.H. (1974). The comparative analysis of power and preference. In J. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power (pp. 150–167 ). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C.L. (1990). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Sociology Working Paper Series, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C.L., and Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, E., and Mazur, A. (1979). Incipient status in small groups. Social Forces, 58, 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, B.R. ( 1986, October). The campus climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V.E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotyping and requisitemanagement characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, W.C. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior.New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, S.E., and Rosenthal, R. (1984). Females in charge: Effects of sex of subordinate and romantic attachment status upon self-ratings of dominance. Journal of Personality, 52, 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, D.S., and Hall, J.A. (1984). Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 440–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, S. (1969). The effect of interpersonal looking duration on dominance judgments. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 285–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Office of Personnel Management (1989). Report on minority group and sex by pay plan and appointing authority (EPMD Report No. 40, March 31, 1989 ). Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glinow, M.A., and Krzyczkowska-Mercer, A. ( 1988, Summer). Women incorporate America: A caste of thousands. New Management, 6, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, O. (1970). Proxemic behavior: A cross-cultural study. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M.A., Jr. (1969). Sources of evaluations and expectations for performances. Sociometry, 32, 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M.A., Jr., and Sobieszek, B.I. (1974). Sources of self-evaluation: A formal theory of significant others and social influence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.E., and Best, D.L. (1986). Sex stereotypes and intergroup relations. In S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 244–259 ). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., and Karten, S.J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Steve L. Ellyson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John F. Dovidio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Clifford E. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Brown, C.E. (1992). The Look of Power: Gender Differences and Similarities in Visual Dominance Behavior. In: Gender, Interaction, and Inequality. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2199-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2199-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3098-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2199-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation