Skip to main content
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

The discussion now proceeds to the subject of decision-making in groups. For our purpose, a group is defined as a number of individuals or subgroups that share a common purpose or have one or more common objectives. For example, members of a committee which has been set up to organize an exhibition constitute a group, as do nations linked together by a treaty and companies engaged in a joint venture. These group members can be envisaged as in Fig. 6-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Leavitt, Harold J. Managerial Psychology, University of Chicago Press, Second Edition, Eighth Impression 1970, Part I II.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow, K.J. and H. Raymond Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision Making, The MIT Press, 1986, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brams, S.J. Paradoxes in Politics, The Free Press, 1976, pp. 184–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brams, Si. Paradoxes in Politics, op cit.,p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishburn, P.C. and J.D.C. Little. “An Experiment in Approval Voting”, Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1988, pp. 555–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Condorcet, Marquis de. Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues a la pluralité des voix, Paris 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paper by E.J. Nanson in Transactions and Procedures of the Royal Society of Victoria, Vol. 19, 1882, pp. 197–240.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brams, S.J. op cit.,pp. 29–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Balinski, M.L. and H.P. Young, “The Quota Method of Apportionment,” American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 82, Aug.-Sept. 1975, pp. 701–730.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brams, S.J. op cit.,pp. 137–166.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A function of this nature has been discussed in Marshall, A. Principles of Economics,8th Edition, MacMillan 1949, pp. 130–134 and 467–70.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arrow, K.J. Social Choice and Individual Values, Second Edition, Sixth Printing, Yale University Press, 1973: first published by John Wiley and Sons, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid.,p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bergson, Abram. On the Concept of Social Welfare, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 68, May 1954, pp. 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arrow K.J., op cit.,p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blau, Julian. “The Existence of Social Welfare Functions,” Econometrica, Vol. 25, Apr. 1957, pp. 302–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothenberg, Jerome F. The Measurement of Social Welfare, Prentice Hall, 1961, pp. 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luce, R.D., and H. Raiffa. Games and Decisions, Wiley, 1967, pp. 340–370.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rothenberg, J.F. op cit.,pp. 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morrison, K.L. “Intercity Development Association and the Making of the City of Thunder Bay,” Thunder Bay Historical Museum Society, Papers and Records, Vol. IX, 1981, pp. 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Whyte, Glen. “Group Think Reconsidered,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1989, pp. 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marshak, J. “Elements for a Theory of Teams,” Management Science, Vol. 1, 1955, pp. 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bower, J.L. “The Role of Conflict in Economic Decision-making: Some Empirical Results,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 79, 1965, pp. 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaw, M.E. Group Dynamics: the Psychology of Small Group Behaviour, McGraw Hill, 1971, pp. 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kogan, N. and M.A. Wallach. “Risky Shift Phenomenon in Small Decision Making Groups,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. II, 1975, pp. 2534.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clarkson, G.P.E. “Decision Making in Small Groups: a Simulation Study,” Behavioral Science, Vol. 13, 1968, pp. 288–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leavitt, H.J. “Collective Problem Solving in Small Groups,” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, Vol. 46,1951: reprinted in Alexis, M. and Wilson, C.Z. Organizational Decision Making, Prentice Hall, 1967, pp. 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Argyris, C. “Interpersonal Barriers to Decision Making,” Harvard Business Review, March/April 1964, pp. 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Spetzler, C.S. “The Development of a Corporate Risk Policy for Capital Investment Decisions,” IEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC4, Sept. 68, pp. 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Janis, I.L. Victims of Group Think, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Janis, I.L. Decision Making, The Free Press, 1977, pp. 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tullock, G. “A Simple Algebraic Logrolling Model,” American Economic Review, Vol. 60, June 1970, pp. 419–426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Radford, K.J. (1989). Decision-making in Groups. In: Individual and Small Group Decisions. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2068-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2068-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97156-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2068-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics