Skip to main content

Pro: Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy with Fluoroscopic Imaging

  • Chapter
Shock Wave Lithotripsy 2

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has rapidly become well established as the preferred mode of therapy for the majority of symptomatic upper urinary tract calculi.1–9 Shock wave lithotripsy is performed worldwide, and to date the great majority of lithotripsy treatments have been performed utilizing Dornier HM3 and HM4 lithotripters. However, numerous other lithotripters are also in use worldwide, utilizing a variety of different imaging and energy sources.4–8

This presentation was part of a planned debate on the following topic: Resolved: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with fluoroscopic imaging is preferred over piezoelectric lithotripsy with ultrasound imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chaussy CG (ed): Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Technical Concept, Experimental Research, and Clinical Application. 2nd Edition, Basel: Karger, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drach GW, Dretler SP, Fair WR, et al: Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135: 1127, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lingeman JE, Newman DM, Mertz JHO, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol 135: 1134, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilbert DM, Reichenberger H, Hutschenreiter G, et al: Second generation shock wave lithotripsy: experience with the Lithostar. World J Urol 5: 225, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson RC, Bagley DH, Kandel LB, et al: Results of the United States trial of the Technomed Sonolith 2000 lithotripsy: preliminary report. J Endourol 2: 189, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vallancien G, Aviles J, Munoz R, et al: Piezoelectric extracorporeal lithotripsy by ultrashort waves with EDAP LT-01 device. J Urol 139: 689, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marberger M, Turk C, Steinkogler I: Painless piezoelectric extracorporeal lithotripsy. J Urol 139: 695, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rassweiler J, Westhauser A, Bub P: Second-generation lithotripsy: a comparative study. J Endourol 2: 193, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lingeman JE, Woods JR, Toth PD, et al: Role of lithotripsy and its side effects. J Urol 141: 793, 1989.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman DM, Lingeman JE, Steele RE, et al: ESWL treatment using IV analgesia alone with an unmodified Domier HM3 lithotripter. J Urol 141: 271A, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tiselius HG and Peterson B: Our experience of anesthesia-free ESWL treatment with the unmodified Domier HM3 lithotripter. In Lingeman JE and Newman DM (eds): Shock Wave Lithotripsy II: Urinary and Biliary. New York: Plenum Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graff J, Pastor D, Herberhold U, et al: Technical modifications of the Domier HM3 lithotripter with an improved anesthesia technique. World J Urol 5: 202, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Graff J, Benkert S, Pastor J, et al: Experience with a new multifunctional lithotripsy MFL 5000: results of 415 treatments. J Endourol 3: 315, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lingeman JE, Newman DM, Mosbaugh PG, et al: The risk of hypertension following various forms of treatment for urolithiasis. J Urol 141: 241A, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chaussy CG: ESWL: past, present, and future. J Endourol 2: 97, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liedl B, Jocham D, Lunz C, et al: Five-year follow-up of urinary stone patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 2: 157, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adams MC, Newman DM, Lingeman JE, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the pediatric age population: short and long-term results. J Endourol 3: 245, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bush WH, Jones D, Gibbons RP: Radiation dose to patient and personnel during extracòrporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138: 716, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaussy, C.G. (1989). Pro: Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy with Fluoroscopic Imaging. In: Lingeman, J.E., Newman, D.M. (eds) Shock Wave Lithotripsy 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_81

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2054-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2052-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics