Skip to main content

Stone Damage Modes During Piezoelectric Shock Wave Delivery

  • Chapter

Abstract

Using stone phantom models made of plaster of Paris, different modes of stone damage were observed during piezoelectric lithotripter shock wave delivery. A stone phantom in the configuration of a square slab (80 mm by 80 mm by 8 mm) was positioned in water with its horizontal midsurface placed at the geometric focal plane of a Wolf Piezolith 2300 lithotripter. After shock wave exposure, damage was seen at both the lower surface (the surface facing the wave arrival) and the upper surface (the surface distal from the wave arrival) of the stone. The fracture surfaces of the residual pieces of plaster were examined by scanning electron microscopy at 10X, 100X and 1000X magnification. Two different modes of stone damage were observed: damage due to cavitation microjets and damage secondary to spalling. At the surface of the phantom directly facing the incident wave, damage of a cavitation type was observed. The cavitation damage was a deep crater (approximately 3 mm diameter) surrounded by an annular zone (approximately 6 mm diameter) of flake-off failure. Under magnification, surface erosion with scattered pits (ranging from 10 to 300 microns) was observed. The surface erosion was caused by repeated loading, whereas the pits were caused by the high velocity penetration of microjets formed from freshly collapsed cavitation bubbles. At the distal surface of the stone phantom, damage of a spalling type was observed. The spalling damage was characterized by separation of a spherical cap from the pellet surface. Irregular but fine grain texture was found on the fracture surface, a pattern commonly seen on brittle materials after tensile failure. The incident compression wave was reflected as tensile wave at the distal surface of the phantom due to the lower wave impedance of the neighboring water. The separation of the cap occurred when the reflected tension exceeded the tensile strength of the stone.

Spalling may be an undesirable effect from a clinical view point, since the size of stone fragments caused by this phenomenon may be too large to pass spontaneously. The findings of this study suggest that the geometry of the stone, combined with the focal position of the shock wave will determine whether fragmentation will occur by cavitation effect or by a spalling phenomenon, and the type of fragmentation may predict the size of the stone fragments produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chaussy CG: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Technical Concept, Experimental Research, and Clinical Application. 2nd Edition, Basel: Karger, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sauerbruch T, Delius M, Paumgartner G, et al: Fragmentation of gallstones by extracorporeal shock wave. NEJM 314: 818, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coleman AJ, Sanders JE, Crum LA, et al: Acoustic cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Ultrasound Med and Biol 13: 69, 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hammitt FG: Cavitation and multiphase flow phenomena. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carstensen EL: Acoustic cavitation and the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med and Biol 13: 597, 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crum LA, Daniels S, Ter Haar GR, et al: Ultrasonically induced gas bubble production in agar based gels. Ultrasound Med and Biol 13: 541, 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller DL: A review of the ultrasonic bioeffects of microsonation, gas-body activation, and related cavitation like phenomena. Ultrasound Med and Biol 13: 443, 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolsky H: Stress Waves in Solids. Dover Publication, Inc. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CRC Handbook for Applied Engineering Science, pp. 643.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaneko H, Watanabe H, Takahashi T, et al: Strength of wet and dry urinary calculi. Jap J Urol 70: 61, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zukas JA, Nicholas T, Swift HF, et al: Impact Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chuong, C.J., Zhong, P., Arnott, H.J., Preminger, G.M. (1989). Stone Damage Modes During Piezoelectric Shock Wave Delivery. In: Lingeman, J.E., Newman, D.M. (eds) Shock Wave Lithotripsy 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2054-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2052-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics