Skip to main content

On the Detection of Squeezed States

  • Conference paper
Book cover Coherence and Quantum Optics V

Abstract

Two fundamental sources of quantum noise, photon counting, and radiation pressure limit the sensitivity of interferometric gravitational wave antennas. A detailed analysis of this problem was recently performed.1 It was shown that, with the relatively weak CW lasers presently available, photon-counting noise dominates. On shining a “squeezed-state” of the radiation field into the usually unused part of the interferometer, the photon counting noise can be decreased, while increasing the radiation pressure noise, thus allowing to optimize the sensitivity of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. D23, 1693 (1981).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1397 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Milburn and D. F. Walls, Optics Commun. 39, 401 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. F. Walls and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 709 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 136 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. P. Yuen and J. H. Shapiro, Optics Lett. 4, 334 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Becker, M. O. Scully, and M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 475 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. A. Lugiato and G. Strini, Optics Commun. 41, 67 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Meystre and M. S. Zubairy, Phys. Lett. 89A, 390 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. See, for example, R. J. Glauber, in Quantum Optics and Electronics, edited by C. DeWitt, A. Blandin, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Bambini and A. Renieri, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 31, 399 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, J. D. Cresser and P. Meystre, in Optical Bistability, edited by C. M. Bowden, M. Ciftan, and H. R. Robl ( Plenum Press, New YOrk, 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meystre, P., Wódkiewicz, K., Zubairy, M.S. (1984). On the Detection of Squeezed States. In: Mandel, L., Wolf, E. (eds) Coherence and Quantum Optics V. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0605-5_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0605-5_110

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0607-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0605-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics