Skip to main content

Bacteriuria Screening: Evaluation of Current Methods

  • Chapter
  • 78 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 224))

Abstract

Diagnostic screens for patient specimens of high frequency such as blood and urine are advantageous in the current health care climate which places emphasis on cost containment and the rapid turn around time of result reporting. Over the past few years rapid diagnostic methods for the detection of bacteriuria have increased in availability for the clinical microbiology laboratory. The advantages and limitations of these new systems can be evaluated through the performance of carefully designed comparative studies with reference urine culture methods. By reviewing published reports as well as conducting in-house parallel studies microbiologists can evaluate the newer methods in terms of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Additional parameters to be considered during an evaluation include workload efficiency based on time studies, impact on routine workflow, hands-on technologist time, total turnaround time and cost effectiveness. Historically, microbiologists and other lab professionals have approached new technology either directly or indirectly with these parameters in mind. However, under the new hospital Medicare prospective payment programs based on diagnostic related groups (DRG) this approach to new methodologies is now essential in the day-to-day operation of the lab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kass, E.H. Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract. Arch. Intern. Med. 100: 709–714, 1957.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kass, E.H., and M. Finland. Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract. Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians 69: 56–63, 1956.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sabath, L.D. and D. Charles. Urinary tract infections in the female. Obstet. Gynecol. 55: 1625–1705, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McFadyen, I.R. S.J. Eykyn, M.H.N. Gardner, et al. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 80: 385–405, 1973.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Warren, J.W., J.H. Tenney, J.M. Hoopes, H.L. Muncie and W.C. Anthony. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic indwelling catheters. J. Infect. Dis. 146: 719–723, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Platt, R., B.F. Polk, B. Murdock and B. Rosner. Mortality associated withnosocomial urinary tract infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 307: 637–642, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garibaldi, R.A., J.P. Burke, M.L. Dickman, and C.B. Smith. Factors pre disposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization. N. Engl. J. Med. 291: 215–219, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Piatt, R. Quantitative definition of bacteriuria. Am. J. Med 75 IB: 44–52, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stamm, W.E., K.F. Wagner, R. Amsel et al. Courses of the acute urethral syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 303: 409–415, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mond, N.C., A. Percival, J.D. Williams and W. Brumfitt. Presentation, diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in general practice. Lancet 1: 514–516, 1965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stamm, W.E. Interpretation of urine cultures. Clin. Micobiol. Newsl. 5: 15–17, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Albers, A.C. and R.D. Fletcher. Accuracy of the calibrated loop transfer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18: 40–42, 1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grout, F.V. and R.C. Tilton. Rapid screening of urine by gram stain, acridine orange stain, and Autobac MTS. Abstr. Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. C2: 312, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bartlett, R.C., D. O’Neill and J.C. McLaughlin. Detection of bac-teriuria by leukocyte esterase, nitrite, and the Automicrobic System. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 82: 683–687, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Granato, P.A. Evaluation of a dip-slide device for enumeration of bacteria in urine. Lab. Med. 11: 246–250, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gantrill, H.F. and B.H. Stokes. Comparison of Bac-T-Screen, leuko cyte esterase and nitrite strips to conventional urine cultures. Abstr. Annu. Meet. Interscience Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 733: 219, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoyt, S.M. and P.D. Ellner. Evaluation of the bacteriuria detection device. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:882–884,1983.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. David, J.R., C.E. Stager and G.F. Araj. Clinical laboratory evaluation of a bacteriuria detection device for urine screening. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 81: 48–53, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Park, C.H., D.L. Hixon, C.C. McClintock et al. Rapid detection of insignificant bacteriuria by concomitant use of Lumac System and Gram’s stain. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 82: 593–596, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Evangelista, A.T. and J. DeObaldia. Bacteriuria screening by bio-luminescence: clinical evaluation of the Lumac/3M system. Abstr. Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. C179: 266, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly, M.T. and L.C. Balfour. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac. J. Clin. Microbiol. 13: 677–680, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pezzlo, M.T., G.L. Tan, E.M. Peterson and L.M. de la Maza. Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems. J. Clin. Microbiol 15: 468–474, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evangelista, A.T. (1987). Bacteriuria Screening: Evaluation of Current Methods. In: Bondi, A., Stieritz, D.D., Campos, J.M., Miller, L.A. (eds) Urogenital Infections. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 224. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8932-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8932-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8934-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8932-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics