Skip to main content

Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Model M4

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma
  • 1241 Accesses

Abstract

Glaucoma drainage devices are helpful in the management of intractable glaucoma, which does not respond well to conventional medical and surgical therapies. Surgeons also may choose to use glaucoma drainage devices for primary surgery for glaucoma. The Ahmed Glaucoma Valve is a glaucoma drainage device that has a flow-resistive valve mechanism. This valve is helpful in minimizing postoperative hypotony and complications associated with hypotony, including flat anterior chamber, choroidal effusions, and suprachoroidal hemorrhage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boyle IV JW, Netland PA. Ahmed glaucoma valve drainage implant. In: Shaarawy TM, Sherwood MB, Hitchings RA, Crowston JG, editors. Glaucoma, Surgical management, vol. 2. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. p. 425–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, Choplin N, Kotas-Neumann R, Tam M, Bacharach J, Panek WC. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:23–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, Siegner SW, Moster MR, Hill RA. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:27–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA, Monshizadeh R, Netland PA, Richards DW, Layden WE. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1968–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heuer DK, Lloyd MA, Abrams DA, Baerveldt G, Minckler DS, Lee MB, Martone JF. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1512–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Broadway DC, Iester M, Schulzer M, Douglas GR. Survival analysis for success of Molteno tube implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:689–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith MF, Doyle JW, Sherwood MB. Comparison of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant with the double-plate Molteno drainage implant. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:444–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Siegner SW, Netland PA, Urban Jr RC, Williams AS, Richards DW, Latina MA, Brandt JD. Clinical experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1298–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Britt MT, LaBree LD, Lloyd MA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the 350-mm2 versus the 500-mm2 Baerveldt implant: longer term results. Is bigger better? Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2312–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Aswad LA, Netland PA, Bellows AR, et al. Clinical experience with the double-plate Ahmed glaucoma valve. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:390–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Costa VP, Azuara-Blanco A, Netland PA, Lesk MR, Arcieri ES. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive mitomycin C during Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. A prospective randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1071–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayyala RS, Harman LE, Michelini-Norris B, Ondrovic LE, Haller E, Margo CE, Stevens SX. Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:233–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ayyala RS, Michelini-Norris B, Flores A, Haller E, Margo CE. Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices: part 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1081–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishida K, Netland PA, Costa VP, Shiroma L, Khan B, Ahmed II. Comparison of polypropylene and silicone Ahmed glaucoma valves. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1320–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinkle DM, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS. A comparison of the polypropylene plate Ahmed glaucoma valve to the silicone plate Ahmed glaucoma flexible valve. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17:696–701.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackenzie PJ, Schertzer RM, Isbister CM. Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Law SK, Nguyen A, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Comparison of safety and efficacy between silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1514–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brasil MV, Rockwood EJ, Smith SD. Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valve implants. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:36–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Netland PA. The Ahmed glaucoma valve in neovascular glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;107:325–42.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wellisz T. Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993;17:339–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katwitter JJ, Bagwell JG, Weinstein AM, et al. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976;10:311–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spector M, Harmon SL, Kreutner A. Characteristics of tissue growth into Proplast and porous polyethylene implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1979;13:677–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. DeCroos FC, Ahmad S, Kondo Y, et al. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane alters tissue response to implanted Ahmed glaucoma valve. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34:562–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DeCroos FC, Kondo Y, Mordes D, et al. In vitro fluid dynamics of the Ahmed glaucoma valve modified with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36:112–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim J, Allingham RR, Hall J, et al. Clinical experience with a novel glaucoma drainage implant. J Glaucoma. 2013. Epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial Disclosure

The University of Virginia has received research support from New World Medical for a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter A. Netland MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Implantation of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Model M4. This video demonstrates the steps for implantation of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve M4 (WMV 110218 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Netland, P.A. (2014). Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Model M4. In: Samples, J.R., Ahmed, I.I.K. (eds) Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8347-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8348-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics