Abstract
Glaucoma drainage devices are helpful in the management of intractable glaucoma, which does not respond well to conventional medical and surgical therapies. Surgeons also may choose to use glaucoma drainage devices for primary surgery for glaucoma. The Ahmed Glaucoma Valve is a glaucoma drainage device that has a flow-resistive valve mechanism. This valve is helpful in minimizing postoperative hypotony and complications associated with hypotony, including flat anterior chamber, choroidal effusions, and suprachoroidal hemorrhage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boyle IV JW, Netland PA. Ahmed glaucoma valve drainage implant. In: Shaarawy TM, Sherwood MB, Hitchings RA, Crowston JG, editors. Glaucoma, Surgical management, vol. 2. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. p. 425–35.
Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, Choplin N, Kotas-Neumann R, Tam M, Bacharach J, Panek WC. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:23–31.
Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, Siegner SW, Moster MR, Hill RA. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:27–33.
Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA, Monshizadeh R, Netland PA, Richards DW, Layden WE. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1968–76.
Heuer DK, Lloyd MA, Abrams DA, Baerveldt G, Minckler DS, Lee MB, Martone JF. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1512–9.
Broadway DC, Iester M, Schulzer M, Douglas GR. Survival analysis for success of Molteno tube implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:689–95.
Smith MF, Doyle JW, Sherwood MB. Comparison of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant with the double-plate Molteno drainage implant. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:444–7.
Siegner SW, Netland PA, Urban Jr RC, Williams AS, Richards DW, Latina MA, Brandt JD. Clinical experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1298–307.
Britt MT, LaBree LD, Lloyd MA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the 350-mm2 versus the 500-mm2 Baerveldt implant: longer term results. Is bigger better? Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2312–8.
Al-Aswad LA, Netland PA, Bellows AR, et al. Clinical experience with the double-plate Ahmed glaucoma valve. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:390–1.
Costa VP, Azuara-Blanco A, Netland PA, Lesk MR, Arcieri ES. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive mitomycin C during Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. A prospective randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1071–6.
Ayyala RS, Harman LE, Michelini-Norris B, Ondrovic LE, Haller E, Margo CE, Stevens SX. Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:233–6.
Ayyala RS, Michelini-Norris B, Flores A, Haller E, Margo CE. Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices: part 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1081–4.
Ishida K, Netland PA, Costa VP, Shiroma L, Khan B, Ahmed II. Comparison of polypropylene and silicone Ahmed glaucoma valves. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1320–6.
Hinkle DM, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS. A comparison of the polypropylene plate Ahmed glaucoma valve to the silicone plate Ahmed glaucoma flexible valve. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17:696–701.
Mackenzie PJ, Schertzer RM, Isbister CM. Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42:227–32.
Law SK, Nguyen A, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Comparison of safety and efficacy between silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1514–20.
Brasil MV, Rockwood EJ, Smith SD. Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valve implants. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:36–41.
Netland PA. The Ahmed glaucoma valve in neovascular glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;107:325–42.
Wellisz T. Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993;17:339–44.
Katwitter JJ, Bagwell JG, Weinstein AM, et al. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976;10:311–23.
Spector M, Harmon SL, Kreutner A. Characteristics of tissue growth into Proplast and porous polyethylene implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1979;13:677–92.
DeCroos FC, Ahmad S, Kondo Y, et al. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane alters tissue response to implanted Ahmed glaucoma valve. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34:562–7.
DeCroos FC, Kondo Y, Mordes D, et al. In vitro fluid dynamics of the Ahmed glaucoma valve modified with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36:112–7.
Kim J, Allingham RR, Hall J, et al. Clinical experience with a novel glaucoma drainage implant. J Glaucoma. 2013. Epub ahead of print.
Financial Disclosure
The University of Virginia has received research support from New World Medical for a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Implantation of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Model M4. This video demonstrates the steps for implantation of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve M4 (WMV 110218 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Netland, P.A. (2014). Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Model M4. In: Samples, J.R., Ahmed, I.I.K. (eds) Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8347-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8348-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)