Abstract
Social media has changed the way the United States government communicates with its citizens. Microblogging tools such as Twitter have developed beyond the previous regulations for social media created to meet the directives of the Obama administration. In 2009 the new “open government” movement began a flutter of social networking on behalf of all branches of government. The passage of time has shown that using social media to share information has developed and is being integrated into the methods the government uses to reach out to the community. However, the majority of agencies still have one social media policy for all types of social media tools. The rules that apply to Facebook are the same rules that apply to Twitter. The two social media services are vastly different but regulated the same. It is suggested that policies need to be developed for each form of social media. An analysis was conducted of 23 US government agencies policies and best practices for specifically microblogging to discover who did and did not have a microblogging policy. Results showed the majority of agencies still treat microblogging as a standard form of social media and do not provide individual polices and best practices. Further analysis also discovered what agencies did have a policy for microblogging and advised other agencies without a microblogging policy to follow their example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M (2010). Crowd-Sourcing Transparency: ICTs, Social Media, and Government Transparency Initiatives. 11th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Puebla, Mexico.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Munson, S., & Glaisyer, T. (2010). Engaging the Public in Open Government: Social Media Technology and Policy for Government Transparency.
Caidi, N., & Ross, A. (2005). Information Rights and National Security. Government Information Quaterly, 663–684.
Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction Between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 271–300.
Cousins, M. (2010, June). USGovernment. Retrieved September 13, 2011, from Twitter Fan Wiki Web site: http://twitter.pbworks.com/w/page/1779986/USGovernment
Dawes, S. (2010). Stewardship and Usefulness: Policy Principles for Information-based Transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 377–383.
Day, R. (2007). Kling and the “Critical”: Social Informatics and Critical Informatics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 575–582.
Dearstyne, B. (2005). Fighting Terrorism, Making War: Critical Insights in the Management of Information and Intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 170–186.
Department of Agriculture (USDA). (n.d.). Privacy Policy. Retrieved September 24, 2011, from Department of Agriculture Web site: http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=PRIVACY_POLICY&navtype=FT
Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). USDA Comment Policy. Retrieved September 24, 2011, from Department of Agriculture Web site: http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentid=comment_policy.xml&contentidonly=true
Department of Agriculture. (2010, February 24). USDA Information Quality Activities. Retrieved September 24, 2011, from Department of Agriculture: http://www.ocio.usda.gov/qi_guide/index.html
Department of Commerce. (2011, June). Open Government Plan Version 1.5. Retrieved September 25, 2011, from Department of Commerce Web site: http://open.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/DOC%20Open%20Government%20Plan%20v%201_5%20Final%202011-06-30.pdf
Department of Education. (2010). Open Government Plan. Washington D.C.: Department of Education.
Department of Energy. (n.d.). Social Media. Retrieved September 26, 2011, from Department of Energy Web site: http://energy.gov/about-us/web-policies/social-media
Department of Health and Human Services. (2010, May 3). HHS Guidance on When and How to Engage over New Media Platforms. Retrieved September 26, 2011, from Department of Health and Human Services Web site: http://newmedia.hhs.gov/resources/hhscnm_guidance_on_when_and_how_to_engage_over_new_media_platforms_05032010.pdf
Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). HHS Twitter Guidance. Retrieved September 26, 2011, from HHS Center for New Media Web site: http://newmedia.hhs.gov/resources/twitter_guidance.html
Department of Housing and Urban Development. (n.d.). Privacy Policy. Retrieved September 28, 2011, from Department of Housing and Urban Development: http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/privacy_policy
Department of Housing and Urban Development. (n.d.). Transparency Initiatives. Retrieved September 28, 2011, from Department of Housing and Urban Development Web site: http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/open/plan/transparency-initiatives
Department of Justice. (2009). Privacy Impact Assessment for Third-Party Social Web Services. Washington D.C.: Department of Justice.
Department of Labor. (2010). Open Government Plan Version 1.0. Washington D.C.: Department of Labor.
Department of Labor. (n.d.). Privacy and Security Statement. Retrieved September 28, 2011, from Department of Labor Web site: http://dol.gov/dol/privacynotice.htm
Department of Veterans Affairs. (2011, June 28). Use of Web-based Collaboration Technologies. Retrieved October 3, 2011, from Department of Verterans Affairs Web site: http://www.va.gov/vapubs/viewpublication.asp?pub_id=551
Department of Veterans Affairs. (2011, August 16). VA Publishes Social Media Policy. Retrieved October 3, 2011, from The Department of Veterans Affairs Web site: http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=2150
Deputy Secretary of Defense. (2011). Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-026—Responsible and Effective Use of Internet-based Capabilities. Washington D.C.: Department of Defense.
Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996. (n.d.). Retrieved September 10, 2011, from Thomas Web site: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c104:1:./temp/~c104OVIIWe:e5787
Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Privacy and Security Notice. Retrieved October 3, 2011, from Environmental Protection Agency: http://www.epa.gov/epahome/usenotice.htm
Environmental Protection Agency. (2011a). Representing EPA Online Using Social Media. Washington D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2011b). Should I Respond Online On EPA’s Behalf? Washington D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2011c). Using Social Media Internally at EPA. Washington D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2011d). Using Social Media to Communicate with the Public. Washington D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
Eschenfelder, K. R., & Beachboard, J. C. (1997). Assessing U.S. Federal Government Websites. Government Information Quarterly, 173–190.
GovTwit. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2011, from GovTwit Web site: http://govtwit.com/Hopkins, J. Social Networking Tools and Web 2.0—Appropriate Use of Web Technologies. Washington D.C. : National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Kling, R. (2002, 12 3). Critical Professional Education about Information and Communications Technologies and Social Life. Retrieved 9 10, 2011, from Center for Social Informatics Web site: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/168/WP02-06B.html?sequence=1
Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, S., Dridi, F., & Pernul, G. (2003). Security Requirements for e- government services: A Methodological Approach for Developing a Common PKI-based Security Policy. Computer Communications, 1873–1883.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, 122–136.
Lee-Ashley, M. (2010, November 18). Notices—Social Media Policy. Retrieved September 29, 2011, from Department of the Interior: http://www.doi.gov/notices/Social-Media-Policy.cfm
Lichtenstein, J. (2010, July 16). Digital Diplomacy. Retrieved July 13, 2011, from New York Times Magazine Web site: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/magazine/18web2-0-t.html
McShea, K. (2009). Government 2.0: Privacy and Best Practices Report on the DHS Privacy Office Public Workshop. Washington D.C. : Department of Homeland Security.
National Science Foundation. (2010). Chief FOIA Officer Report for 2010. Retrieved October 3, 2011, from the National Science Foundation, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2011/ogc11002/ogc11002.pdf
Obama, B. (2009, January 21). Transparency and Open Government. Retrieved July 13, 2011, from White House Web site: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/
Oltmann, S. M., Rosenbaum, H., & Hara, N. (2006). Digital Access to Government Information: To What Extent are Agencies in Compliance with EFOIA? 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Autin, Texas: E-prints in Library and Information Science.
Small Business Administration. (n.d.). SBA Privacy Policy: Twitter. Retrieved October 3, 2011, from Small Business Administration Web site: http://www.sba.gov/about-sba-info/21331
Smith, A. (2011). 13% of Online Adults Use Twitter. Washington, D.C. : Pew Research Center.
State Department. (2010). U.S. Department of State Open Government Plan. Washington D.C. : Department of State.
The List/Agencies. (2011, 9 10). Retrieved 9 10, 2011, from GovTwit Web site: http://govtwit.com/list/all/tags/agencies
Treasury Department. (2011, April 1). Site Policies and Notices. Retrieved September 29, 2011, from Treasury Department Web site: http://www.treasury.gov/SitePolicies/Pages/privacy.aspx
U.S. Agency for International Development. (n.d.). Privacy and Security. Retrieved October 3, 2011, from U.S. Agency for International Development Web site: http://www.usaid.gov/privacy.html
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2010). U.S. Department of Transportation Open Government Plan Version 1.2. Washington D.C. : Department of Transportation.
U.S. General Services Administration. (2011, June 28). Chapter 2. What is Social Media? Retrieved October 3, 2011, from U.S. General Services Administration: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/250041
U.S. General Services Administration. (2011). GSA’s Guide to Official Use of Social Media. Washington D.C. : U.S. General Services Administration.
U.S. General Services Administration. Social Media Comments Policy. Washington D.C. : U.S. General Services Administration.
U.S. Government. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2011, from Listorious Web site: http://listorious.com/GOVsites/u-s-federal-government
Wang, L., Bretschneider, S., & Gant, J. (2005). Evaluating Web-based e-government services with a citizen-centric approach. 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Wilshusen, G. C. (2010, July 22). Information Management Challenges in Federal Agencies’ Use of Web 2.0 Technologies. Retrieved July 13, 2011, from Government Accountability Office Web site: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10872t.pdf
Wilshusen, G. (2011, June 28). Social Media: Federal Agencies Need Policies and Procedures for Managing and Protecting Information They Access and Disseminate. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from Government Accountability Office Web site: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11605.pdf
Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does E-Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 275–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webb, P.L. (2012). Microblogging: An Analysis of Government Issued Policies and Best Practices. In: Reddick, C., Aikins, S. (eds) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1447-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1448-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)