Abstract
This chapter discusses how social media use can enhance interaction between citizens and parliaments. The presence of parliamentary institutions in Europe and the Americas in social media is researched and quantitavely assessed. A specific question, on the citizen side, is to what extent social media is used by parliaments for informative purposes only, or for more substantial forms of citizen feedback. The ways in which parliaments can change to use social media for transparency and citizen engagement are therefore investigated. This chapter contributes to the research on using social media to enhance transformation of public bodies and citizen participation for democratic governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al Hasib, A. (2009) Threats of online social networks. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. Vol.9, No 11, November 2009.
Arnstein, Sherry R. (1969) A Ladder of Citizen Participation. JAIP, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 216–224.
Bakera, J.R., Bennett, L.L.M., Bennett, S.E. & Flickinger, R.S. (1996) Citizens’ knowledge and perceptions of legislatures in Canada, Britain and the United States. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 2(2), pp.44–62
Baumgarten, J. & Chui, M. (2009). E-Government 2.0. Retrieved from: http://ww1.mckinsey.com/clientservice/publicsector/pdf/TG_MoG_Issue4_egov.pdf
Blossom, J. (2009). Content Nation. Surviving and thriving as social media changes our work, our lives and our future. Indianapolis, Indiana: Wiley Publishing
Braghiroli, S. (2011) E-virgins, e-MEPs and MEP 2.0: Internet-based Political Communication in the European Parliament. Italian Political Science. Issue 6.
Breslin, J. G., Passant, A. & Decker, St. (2009) The Social Semantic Web. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Buhl. H. U. (2011) From Revolution to Participation: Social Media and the Democratic Decision-Making Process. Business & Informations Systems Engineering. 4|2011, 195–198.
Chrissafis, T. & Rohen, M. (2010). European eParticipation Developments. JeDEM 2(2): 89–98, 2010.
Clarke, A. (2010). Social media. Political uses and implications for representative democracy. Publication No. 2010-10-E, Background Paper, Library of the Parliament of Canada.
Dutta, S. & Mia, I. (2011) The Global Information Technology Report 2010–2011. Transformations 2.0. World Economic Forum, Geneva.
Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J. & Huibers, T. (2011). Social Media and Political Participation: Are facebook, twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh & H. de Bruijn (Eds), ePart 2011, LNCS 6847, pp. 25–35, 2011. Delft: IFIP
Ferro, E. & Molinari, F. (2010). Framing Web 2.0 in the Process of Public Sector Innovation: Going Down the Participation Ladder. European Journal of ePractice, No.9.
Flickinger, R.S., Bennett, L.L.M. & Bennett, S.E. (1995) Citizen Support for the European Parliament: Knowledge and the Democratic Deficit. Retrieved from: http://aei.pitt.edu/6928
Fyfe, T. & Crookall, P. (2010). Social media and public sector policy dilemmas. Retrieved from: http://ipac.ca/documents/correction-June10.pdf
Government of British Columbia (2010). Guidelines for Conducting Citizen Engagement, Specific to Social media. Retrieved from: http://www.gov.bc.ca/citz/citizens_engagement/some_guidelines_master.pdf
Hansard Society (2011a). Parliaments and Public Engagement. Innovation and Good Practice from Around the World. London: Hansard Society.
Hansard Society (2011b). Connecting Citizens to Parliament. London: Hansard Society.
Harler, A. (2010) 6 Differences Between Social Media and Traditional Marketing. Retrieved from: http://www.socialglitz.com/6-differences-between-social-media-and-traditional-marketing/
Kalampokis, E., Hausenblas, M. & Tarabanis, K. (2011) Combining Social and Government Data for Participatory Decision-Making. In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh & H. de Bruijn (Eds), ePart 2011, LNCS 6847, pp.36–47, 2011. Delft: IFIP
Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 59–68.
Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J. & Wong, V (2001) Principles of Marketing. Athens: Kleidarithmos (in greek)
Näkki, P., Bäck, A., Ropponen, T., Kronqvist, J., Hintikka, K. A., Harju, A., Pöyhtäri, R. & Kola, P. (2011) Social media for citizen participation. Report of the Somus Project. Retrieved from: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2011/P755.pdf
Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/
Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E. & Tarabanis, K. (2009). eParticipation Initiatives: How is Europe progressing? European Journal of ePractice. No 7. pp. 15–26
Papaloi, A. & Gouscos, D. (2010). E-parliaments and novel parliament-to-citizen services: An initial overview and proposal. In Parycek, P. & Prosser, A. (Eds.), EDem2010: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-Democracy, pp. 103–111. Wien: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft
Patel, K. (2010). 8 steps to creating a social media strategy. Retrieved from: http://iserviceglobe.com/CaseStudies/Salesforce/ProductPageSalesforceCRM-8StepstoCreatingaSocialMediaStrategy.pdf
Sæbø, Ø. (2011) Understanding twitter Use among Parliament Representatives: A Genre Analysis. In Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A. and de Bruijn, H. (Eds.) ePart 2011, LNCS 6847, pp. 1–12, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
Serrat, O. (2010) Social Media and the Public Sector. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from: http://www.adb.org/documents/information/knowledge-solutions/social-media-and-the-public-sector.pdf
Shweta (2011) Difference between Traditional, Digital and Social Media Marketing. Retrieved from: http://marketinomics.com/digital-marketing-2/traditional-digital-and-social-media-marketing/
Singh, P. (2010) Marketing priority for social media success. Retrieved from: http://www.khabarmedia.com/article/articledetails/id:6
Taufique, K. M. R. & Shahriar, F. M. (2011) Adoption of online social media innovation: who’s inside the spectrum? Global Conference on Innovations in Management. London, UK, 2011.
The H Agency (2010). 8 steps to integrate Social Media into your Marketing Plan. Retrieved from: http://thehagency.com/H-Papers/H-Paper_Integrate_Social_Media.pdf
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2011). Social Media. Federal Agencies Need Policies and Procedures for Managing and Protecting Information They Assess and Disseminate.
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) (2010). Social Media Strategy. Retrieved from: http://www.archives.gov/social-media/strategies/social-media-strategy-2010-12-08.pdf
UNDESA (2010) United Nations E-Government Survey 2010. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.
United Nations & Inter-Parliamentary Union (2010). World e-parliament Report 2010.
Van Wagner, S. (2011) Traditional Media vs Social Media. Retrieved from: http://vwmarketingsolutions.ca/2011/11/traditional-media-vs-social-media/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Papaloi, A., Staiou, E.R., Gouscos, D. (2012). Blending Social Media with Parliamentary Websites: Just a Trend, or a Promising Approach to e-Participation?. In: Reddick, C., Aikins, S. (eds) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1447-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1448-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)