Abstract
Political parties can potentially benefit from Social Media to shape interactions between their members. This chapter presents the Social Media Participation Model (SMPM), which measures the effects of Social Media Participation on political party communities. As people and politicians increasingly adopt Social Media, measuring the effects of Social Media participation on party communities has become more important. However, a literature review revealed that currently there are few measurement methods. Furthermore, most politicians do not know how to use Social Media effectively. Therefore, we propose the Social Media Participation Model that reflects two concepts: Social Media Participation and Community Participation. To measure Social Media Participation, we developed the Social Media Indicator to assess the Social Media use by politicians. Additionally, we integrate media choice theory to evaluate appropriateness of Social Media for certain tasks and strategies. For measuring Community Participation, we deploy the following two constructs: Community Engagement and Sense of Community. By obtaining results from the Social Media Participation Model, it will be clear which use of Social Media positively influence member participation within political communities. This model is the first step in developing a standardized instrument to explore the impact of Social Media Participation on Community Participation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business research methods. Third European Edition, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
Boyd, D. M., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who Cares? First Monday, 15(8), 1–22.
Bradley, A. J. & McDonald, M. P. (2011). Social media success is about purpose (not technology), Harvard Business Review. Retrieved November 3, 2011, from http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/11/social_media_success_is_about.html?utm_source=pulsenews&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+harvardbusiness+%28HBR.org%29
Chavis, D. M., Lee, K. S., & Acosta J. D. (2008). The sense of community (SCI) revised: The reliability and validity of the SCI-2. Paper presented at the 2nd international community psychology conference, Lisboa, Portugal.
Chavis, D. M., & Pretty, G. M. H. (1999). Sense of community: Advances in measurement and application. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 635–642.
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Portsmouth: Little, Brown and Company.
Citron, D. K. (2010). Fulfilling government 2. 0’ s promise with robust privacy protections. Arguendo, The George Washington Law Review, 78(4), 822–845.
Comscore (2011), Nederland wereldwijd nummer 1 in bereik van Twitter en LinkedIn in maart 2011—comScore, Inc. Retrieved November 3, 2011, from http://www.comscore.com/dut/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/4/The_Netherlands_Ranks_number_one_Worldwide_in_Penetration_for_Twitter_and_LinkedIn
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. (2011). Social media and political participation: Are facebook, twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic Participation, Third IFIP WG 9.5 International Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, LNCS Vol. 6847, Springer, 25–35.
Greengard, S. (2009). The first internet president. Communications of the ACM, 52, 16–18.
Grönlund, Å. (2009). ICT is not participation is not democracy—eParticipation development models revisited. ePart 2009 (pp. 12–23).
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). The role of digital media. Journal Of Democracy, 22(3), 35–48.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, (53), 59–68.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. Oxford: University Press Oxford.
Lilleker, D. G., Pack, M., & Jackson, N. (2010). Political parties and Web 2.0: The liberal democrat perspective. Political Studies, 30(2), 105–112.
Macintosh, A., & Smith, E. (2002). Citizen participation in public affairs. EGOV 2002, pp. 256–263.
Medaglia, R. (2007). Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government. Information Polity, 12, 265–280.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.
Montero, M. D. (2009). Political e-mobilisation and participation in the election campaigns of Ségolène Royal (2007) and Barack Obama (2008). Quaderns Del Cac, 33(December), 27–34.
Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as Mass Medium. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 1(4).
Nielsen, (2011). Webinar: State of social media 2011. Retrieved October 30, 2011, from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/events-webinars/2011/state-of-social-media-2011.html
Phang, C. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2008). A framework of ICT exploitation for e-Participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 128–132.
Ray, A. (2010). The implications of consumers spending more time with facebook than Google. Forrester Blogs. Retrieved November 26, 2010, from http://blogs.forrester.com/augie_ray/
Ren, J., & Meister, H. P. (2010). Drawing lessons from Obama for the European context. The International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1), 12–30.
Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451–484. Wiley Online Library.
Roeder, S., Poppenborg, A., Michaelis, S., Märker, O. & Salz, S. R. (2005). Public budget dialogue: An innovative approach to E-Participation. TCGOV 2005. pp. 48–56.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Chichester: Wiley.
Sommer, L., & Cullen, R. (2009). Participation 2.0: A case study of e-participation within the New Zealand government New Zealand New Zealand abstract. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 20089.
Stern, E., Gudes, O., & Svoray, T. (2009). Web-based and traditional public participation in comprehensive planning: A comparative study. Environment And Planning, 36(6), 1067–1085.
Talbot, D. (2008). How Obama really did it: The social-networking strategy that took an obscure senator to the doors of the white house. Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/web/21222/
Tomai, M., Rosa, V., Ella, M., Acunti, A. D., Benedetti, M., & Francescato, D. (2010). Computers & Education virtual communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high schools students. Computers & Education, 54(1), 265–274.
Te’eni, D. (2001). A cognitive affective model of organizational communication. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 1–62.
Vergeer, M., & Pelzer, B. (2009). Consequences of media and Internet use for offline and online network capital and well-being. A causal model approach. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 189–210.
Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A. & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35, 102—106.
Xie, B., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). Older adults and political participation on the Internet : A cross-cultural comparison of the USA and China. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontologyurnal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 23, 1–15.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75–92.
Acknowledgments
The research projects mentioned in this chapter are initiated, supported, and funded by the School of Creative Technology at Saxion University of Applied Sciences in Enschede.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.W.C. (2012). Measuring the Effects of Social Media Participation on Political Party Communities. In: Reddick, C., Aikins, S. (eds) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1447-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1448-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)