Abstract
After the initial excitement, enthusiasm about e-Government has greatly diminished over time as the term has come to be equated with simple administrative services such as driver’s license renewal and online income tax filing and no real transformation seemed to be taking place from e-Government as anticipated. The future of e-Government also seemed bleak and, to many, e-Government has reached its ultimate destination of mediocrity and the past trend seemed to suggest that e-Government is not going to get any better than what we have now. In such context, this chapter explores the implication of the rise of Web 2.0 in the future of e-Government in America. The emergence of Web 2.0 and increasingly available public data and information has created a synergy in which nongovernmental actors such as citizens and NGOs became increasingly capable of developing e-Government type services that have typically been developed by the government. This shift from a single-developer (monopolistic) model of e-Government to a multiple-provider model can work as a foundation from which the real transformative potentials of e-Government may materialize as the new model introduces a much wider spectrum of resources, innovativeness, and political incentives than the traditional model. The implications of the emerging trend in the future of e-Government as well as the changing role of government in e-Government are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
These are economic, education, energy, environmental, financial, geographic, health, housing, licensing, municipal, population, public safety, technology, and transportation data.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
FlyOnTime, National Obesity Comparison Tool, Fix My City DC, Employment Market Explorer, Check it and See, DataMasher, Visualizing Community Health Data, Clean Air Status-Ozone, Plant Hardiness Zone Map (more details available at http://www.data.gov/developers/showcase).
- 8.
- 9.
References
Andersen, K. N., Medaglia, R., Vatrapu, R., Henriken, H. Z., & Gauld, R (2011) The forgotten promise of e-government maturity: Assessing responsiveness in the digital public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 439–445.
Applebaum, A. I. (2002). Failure in the cybermarketplace of ideas. In E. C. Kamarck, & J. S. Nye (Eds.), Governance.com : Democracy in the information age (pp. 17–31). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Baum, C. H., & Di Maio, A. (2000). Gartner's four phases of E-government model. from http://www.gartner.com
Business Insider (February 26, 2011). Make your own mobile apps for the android market. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-02-26/tech/30068937_1_android-apps-app-inventor-mobile-website
Chang, A., & Kannan, P. K. (2008). Leveraging web 2.0 in government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Policy, 15, 1–9.
Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of E-government: Are they correct? an empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523.
Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of E-governance. Public Administration Review, 68, S86–S102.
Edmiston, K. D (2003) State and local E-government: Prospects and challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 20–45.
Executive Office of the President. (2009). Transparency and open government—memorandum for the heads of executive department and agencies. Retrieved 2/1/2011, 2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/
FlyOnTime.us. (2011). About FlyOnTime.us. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.flyontime.us/about
Furlong, S. R., & Kerwin, C. M. (2005). Interest group participation in rule making: A decade of change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 353–370.
Gant, D., Gant, J., & Johnson, C. C. (2002). State Web Portals: Delivering and Financing E-service. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. From http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/state-web-portals-delivering-and-financing-e-service
Grönlund, Å. (2002). Electronic government : Design, applications, and management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Hiller, J., & Belanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. from http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/privacy-strategies-electronic-government
Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the E-government initaitive. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.
Holden, S., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D (2003) Electronic government at the local level. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 325–344.
IDG (2003). IDC Finds that Broadband Adoption Will Drive Internet Traffic Growth, accessed 09/18, 2009, http://www.idc.com
Kenyon, H. (November 26, 2010). Data modeling for the masses. Government Computer News, accessed 02/01/2011, from http://gcn.com/articles/2010/11/26/federal-site-offers-data-modeling-for-the-masses.aspx
Komando, K. (September 8, 2011). Make your own smartphone apps. USA Today,
Kundra, V. (2010). They gave us the beatles, we gave them data.gov. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/01/21/they-gave-us-beatles-we-gave-then-datagov
La Porte, T., Demchak, C. C., & De Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web—empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34(4), 411–446.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122–136.
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4)
Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 12–20.
Norris, D. F. (2010). E-government 2020: Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose. Public Administration Review, 70(Special)
Noveck, B. (2009). Open government laboratories of democracy. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2009/11/19/open-government-laboratories-democracy
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://oreilly.com
Popular Mechanics. (September 1, 2011). How to make your own apps. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/how-to/software/how-to-make-your-own-apps
Ronaghan, S. A . (2001). Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective. New York : United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration. From http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN021547.pdf
Scholl, H. J (2003) Electronic government: Make or buy? In Electronic Government: Second International Conference, EGOV 2003 proceedings Prague, Czech Republic.
Scott, J. K. (2006). “E” the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341–353.
The Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). The community health data initiative. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/innovations/CHDI
Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of E-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83–102.
Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-democracy, E-commerce, and E-research. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259–280.
Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-governance developments in european union cities: Reshaping Government’s relationship with citizens. Governance, 19(2), 277–302.
U.S. General Services Administration. (2011a). About challenge.gov. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://challenge.gov/about
U.S. General Services Administration. (2011b). Data.gov—FAQ. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.data.gov/faq
Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.
Wescott, C. (2001). E-Government in the Asia-Pacific Region. Asian Journal of Political Science 9(2): 1–24.
West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.
West, D. M. (2005). Digital government : Technology and public sector performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
West, D. M. (2008). Improving technology utilization in electronic government around the world. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2000). Confronting information overload. Journal of School Health, 70(4)
Williams, A. (November 11, 2007). Too much information? ignore it. New York Times
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahn, M.J. (2012). Whither E-Government? Web 2.0 and the Future of E-Government. In: Reddick, C., Aikins, S. (eds) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1447-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1448-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)