Skip to main content

Whither E-Government? Web 2.0 and the Future of E-Government

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 1))

Abstract

After the initial excitement, enthusiasm about e-Government has greatly diminished over time as the term has come to be equated with simple administrative services such as driver’s license renewal and online income tax filing and no real transformation seemed to be taking place from e-Government as anticipated. The future of e-Government also seemed bleak and, to many, e-Government has reached its ultimate destination of mediocrity and the past trend seemed to suggest that e-Government is not going to get any better than what we have now. In such context, this chapter explores the implication of the rise of Web 2.0 in the future of e-Government in America. The emergence of Web 2.0 and increasingly available public data and information has created a synergy in which nongovernmental actors such as citizens and NGOs became increasingly capable of developing e-Government type services that have typically been developed by the government. This shift from a single-developer (monopolistic) model of e-Government to a multiple-provider model can work as a foundation from which the real transformative potentials of e-Government may materialize as the new model introduces a much wider spectrum of resources, innovativeness, and political incentives than the traditional model. The implications of the emerging trend in the future of e-Government as well as the changing role of government in e-Government are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://twitter.com/usgsted.

  2. 2.

    https://wiki.state.ma.us/confluence/display/data/Data+Catalog.

  3. 3.

    These are economic, education, energy, environmental, financial, geographic, health, housing, licensing, municipal, population, public safety, technology, and transportation data.

  4. 4.

    http://www.mbta.com/rider_tools/apps/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.opencongress.org/money_trail.

  6. 6.

    http://challenge.gov/about.

  7. 7.

    FlyOnTime, National Obesity Comparison Tool, Fix My City DC, Employment Market Explorer, Check it and See, DataMasher, Visualizing Community Health Data, Clean Air Status-Ozone, Plant Hardiness Zone Map (more details available at http://www.data.gov/developers/showcase).

  8. 8.

    http://pujaplicaciones.javeriana.edu.co/Employment/.

  9. 9.

    http://www.data.gov/semantic/Castnet/html/exhibit.

References

  • Andersen, K. N., Medaglia, R., Vatrapu, R., Henriken, H. Z., & Gauld, R (2011) The forgotten promise of e-government maturity: Assessing responsiveness in the digital public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, A. I. (2002). Failure in the cybermarketplace of ideas. In E. C. Kamarck, & J. S. Nye (Eds.), Governance.com : Democracy in the information age (pp. 17–31). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, C. H., & Di Maio, A. (2000). Gartner's four phases of E-government model. from http://www.gartner.com

  • Business Insider (February 26, 2011). Make your own mobile apps for the android market. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-02-26/tech/30068937_1_android-apps-app-inventor-mobile-website

  • Chang, A., & Kannan, P. K. (2008). Leveraging web 2.0 in government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Policy, 15, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of E-government: Are they correct? an empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of E-governance. Public Administration Review, 68, S86–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmiston, K. D (2003) State and local E-government: Prospects and challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 20–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Office of the President. (2009). Transparency and open governmentmemorandum for the heads of executive department and agencies. Retrieved 2/1/2011, 2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/

  • FlyOnTime.us. (2011). About FlyOnTime.us. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.flyontime.us/about

  • Furlong, S. R., & Kerwin, C. M. (2005). Interest group participation in rule making: A decade of change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gant, D., Gant, J., & Johnson, C. C. (2002). State Web Portals: Delivering and Financing E-service. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. From http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/state-web-portals-delivering-and-financing-e-service

  • Grönlund, Å. (2002). Electronic government : Design, applications, and management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, J., & Belanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. from http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/privacy-strategies-electronic-government

  • Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the E-government initaitive. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D (2003) Electronic government at the local level. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 325–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDG (2003). IDC Finds that Broadband Adoption Will Drive Internet Traffic Growth, accessed 09/18, 2009, http://www.idc.com

  • Kenyon, H. (November 26, 2010). Data modeling for the masses. Government Computer News, accessed 02/01/2011, from http://gcn.com/articles/2010/11/26/federal-site-offers-data-modeling-for-the-masses.aspx

  • Komando, K. (September 8, 2011). Make your own smartphone apps. USA Today,

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundra, V. (2010). They gave us the beatles, we gave them data.gov. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/01/21/they-gave-us-beatles-we-gave-then-datagov

  • La Porte, T., Demchak, C. C., & De Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web—empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34(4), 411–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. F. (2010). E-government 2020: Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose. Public Administration Review, 70(Special)

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, B. (2009). Open government laboratories of democracy. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2009/11/19/open-government-laboratories-democracy

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://oreilly.com

  • Popular Mechanics. (September 1, 2011). How to make your own apps. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/how-to/software/how-to-make-your-own-apps

  • Ronaghan, S. A . (2001). Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective. New York : United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration. From http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN021547.pdf

  • Scholl, H. J (2003) Electronic government: Make or buy? In Electronic Government: Second International Conference, EGOV 2003 proceedings Prague, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. K. (2006). “E” the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). The community health data initiative. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/innovations/CHDI

  • Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of E-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-democracy, E-commerce, and E-research. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-governance developments in european union cities: Reshaping Government’s relationship with citizens. Governance, 19(2), 277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Services Administration. (2011a). About challenge.gov. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://challenge.gov/about

  • U.S. General Services Administration. (2011b). Data.govFAQ. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.data.gov/faq

  • Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wescott, C. (2001). E-Government in the Asia-Pacific Region. Asian Journal of Political Science 9(2): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. M. (2005). Digital government : Technology and public sector performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. M. (2008). Improving technology utilization in electronic government around the world. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2000). Confronting information overload. Journal of School Health, 70(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (November 11, 2007). Too much information? ignore it. New York Times

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Ahn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahn, M.J. (2012). Whither E-Government? Web 2.0 and the Future of E-Government. In: Reddick, C., Aikins, S. (eds) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics