Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 32))

Given a question Q and a sentence/paragraph SP that is likely to contain the answer to Q, an answer selection module is supposed to select the “exact” answer sub-string A ⊂ SP. We study three distinct approaches to solving this problem: one approach uses algorithms that rely on rich knowledge bases and sophisticated syntactic/semantic processing; one approach uses patterns that are learned in an unsupervised manner from the web, using computational biology-inspired alignment algorithms; and one approach uses statistical noisy-channel algorithms similar to those used in machine translation. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of these three approaches and show how they can be combined using a maximum entropy-based framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  • Berger, A. and J. Lafferty. 1999. Information Retrieval as Statistical Translation. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Information Retrieval. Berkeley, CA,222-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikel, D., R. Schwartz, and R. Weischedel. 1999. An Algorithm that Learns What’s in a Name. Machine Learning—Special Issue on NL Learning, 34, 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, E., J. Lin, M. Banko, S. Dumais, and A. Ng. 2001. Data-Intensive Question Answering. Proceedings of the TREC-10 Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 183-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.F., J. Cocke, S.A. Della Pietra, V.J. Della Pietra, F. Jelinek, J.D. Lafferty, R.L. Mercer, and P.S. Roossin. 1990. A Statistical Approach to Machine Translation. Computational Linguistics 16(2):79-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.F., S. Della Pietra, V. Della Pietra and R. Mercer. 1993. The Mathematics of Statistical Machine Translation: Parameter Estimation. Computational Linguistics 19(2):263-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, J.P., W.B. Croft, and J. Broglio. 1995.“TREC and Tipster Experiments with Inquery”. Information Processing and Management 31(3), 327-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, K.W. 1988. A Stochastic Parts Program and Noun Phrase Parser for Unrestricted Text. Proceedings of the Second Conference in Applied Natural Language Processing. 136-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Pietra, S., V. Della Pietra, and J. Lafferty. 1995. Inducing Features of Random Fields. Technical Report Department of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, CMU-CS, 95-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, D. 1997. Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology. Chapter 6: Linear Time Construction of Suffix Trees, 94-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermjakob, U. 1997. Learning Parse and Translation Decisions from Examples with Rich Context. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas Austin. file: ftp.cs.utexas.edu/pub/mooney/ papers/hermjakob-dissertation-97.ps.gz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermjakob, U. 2001. Parsing and Question Classification for Question Answering. Proceedings of the Workshop on Question Answering at ACL-2001. Toulouse, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermjakob, U., A. Echihabi, and D. Marcu. 2002. Natural Language Based Reformulation Resource and Web Exploitation for Question Answering. Proceedings of the TREC-11. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E.H., U. Hermjakob, C.-Y. Lin, and D. Ravichandran. 2002. Using Knowledge to Facilitate Pinpointing of Factoid Answers. Proceedings of the COLING-2002 Conference. Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittycheriah, A. 2001. Trainable Question Answering System. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, F. 1997. Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. and D. Marcu. 2002. Summarization Beyond Sentence Extraction: A Probabilistic Approach to Sentence Compression. Artificial Intelligence, 139(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. and P. Pantel. 2001. Discovery of Interface Rules for Question Answering. Journal for Natural Language Engineering 7(4), 343-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnini, B., M. Negri, R. Prevete, and H. Tanev. 2002. Is it the Right Answer? Exploiting Web Redundancy for Answer Validation. Proceedings of the 40th Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL). Philadelphia, PA, 425-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J.H., K.S. Lee, D.S. Chang, C.W. Seo, and K.S. Choi. 2001. TREC-10 Experiments at KAIST: Batch Filtering and Question Answering. Proceedings of the TREC-10 Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 354-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran, D. and E.H. Hovy. 2002. Learning Surface Text Patterns for a Question Answering System. Proceedings of the40 th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(ACL). Philadelphia, PA 41-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran, D., E.H. Hovy and F.J. Och. 2003. Statistical QA - Classifier vs Re-ranker: What’s the difference? Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering-Machine Learning and Beyond. Sapporo, Japan, 69-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soubbotin, M.M. and S.M. Soubbotin. 2001. Patterns of Potential Answer Expressions as Clues to the Right Answer. Proceedings of the TREC-10 Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 175-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, E. 1999. Overview of the Question Answering Track. Proceedings of the TREC-8 Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 71-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, E. 2000. Overview of the Question Answering Track. Proceedings of the TREC-9 Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 71-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, E. 2001. Overview of the Question Answering Track. Proceedings of the TREC-10 Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 157-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, E. 2002. Overview of the Question Answering Track. Proceedings of the TREC-11 Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 115-123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Echihabi, A., Hermjakob, U., Hovy, E., Marcu, D., Melz, E., Ravichandran, D. (2008). How To Select An Answer String?. In: Strzalkowski, T., Harabagiu, S.M. (eds) Advances in Open Domain Question Answering. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4746-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics