Abstract
Emmerson’s initial paragraphs provide an accessible and amusing contrast of the social values at issue in the “Asian values” debate. He and his Singaporean cab driver disagree about the relative merits of personal freedom and social harmony in an argument over the appropriateness of automobile speed governors. Emmerson acknowledges the long-standing nature of this debate as well as recent instances in Singaporean public life that help to keep it alive (e.g., the case of Michael Fay who was caned as punishment for vandalism). Yet he characterizes much opinion on the question of whether Asian and Western values differ as prone to commit one or the other of two fallacies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aeschylus. 1970. The Persians. Translated with commentary by A. Podlecki. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bowring, P. 1994. The claims about “Asian” values don’t usually bear scrutiny. International Herald Tribune (July 10): 4.
Davison, W. P. 1983. The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (Spring): 3.
Fernandez, W. 1994. Judge: Enough evidence for case against Lingle, four others. Straits Times (December 26): 2.
Hitchcock, D. 1994. Asian values and the United States: How much conflict? Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Kausikan, B. 1993. Asia’s different standard. Foreign Policy 92 (Fall): 24–41.
Lingle, C. 1994a. Singapore repression reveals regime’s insecurity. Daily Yomiuri (December 2): 6.
Lingle, C. 1994b. The smoke over parts of Asia obscures some profound concerns. International Herald Tribune (July 10): 4.
Mahbubani, K. 1994a. You may not like it, Europe, but this Asian medicine could help. International Herald Tribune (October 1, 2): 4.
Mahbubani, K. 1994b. The United States: Go east, young man. Washington Quarterly 17 (Spring): 7.
Neier, A. 1993. Asia’s unacceptable standard. Foreign Policy 92 (Fall): 42–51.
Perloff, R. 1993. Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 5 (Summer): 167–184.
Rajaratnam, S. 1977. Asian values and modernization. In Asian values and modernization, edited by S. Chee-Meow. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Reuter’s. 1995. Singapore attacks opposition and U.S. columnist Safire. ClariNet Communications online. (July 24).
Safire, W. 1995a. Singapore’s fear. New York Times (July 20): A15.
Safire, W. 1995b. Honoring repression. New York Times (July 10): A13.
Safire, W. 1995c. Singapoverty. New York Times (February 2): A17.
Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
Trompenaars, F. 1994. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
Zakaria, F. 1994. Culture is destiny: A conversation with Lee Kuan Yew. Foreign Affairs 73 (March–April).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2000 Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emmerson, D.K. (2000). Singapore and the “Asian Values” Debate. In: Crothers, L., Lockhart, C. (eds) Culture and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-312-23300-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-62965-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)