Abstract
The main difficulties in trying to derive and apply social welfare criteria, such as utilitarianism or maximin, to the problem of intergenerational justice come from time-irreversibility. Future generations cannot compensate for a sacrifice made by earlier ones, or ask for just sharing of past resources that were wasted. There is a possible altruistic approach to intergenerational equity. However, it requires that the altruism of future generations be secured. In any case, intergenerational equity is not only a matter of gifts from present to future generations. It is also an issue of ‘retro-gifts’ which have to be socially contracted. In economic terms, this is translated into the problem of finding a just rate of savings, taking into account both the well-being of the present generation and the productivity of capital for future generations and considering the impossibility of ex post transfers from future generations to present ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allais, M. (1947) Economic et Intérêt, Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
Arrow, K. J. (1962) ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 80, pp. 155–73.
Arrow, K.J. (1973) ‘Rawls’s Principle of Just Savings’, Swedish Journal of Economics, vol. 75, pp. 323–35.
Dasgupta, P. (1974) ‘On Some Alternative Criteria for Justice between Generations’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 3, pp. 405–23.
Diamond, P. A. (1965) ‘National Debt in a Neoclassical Model’, American Economic Review, vol. 55, pp. 1126–50.
Kolm, S. C. (1971) Justice et Équité, Paris: CEPREMAP. Reprinted Paris: CNRS, 1972. Translated as Justice and Equity, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1998.
Lerner, A. P. (1959) ‘Consumption-Loan Interest and Money’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, pp. 512–18.
Lucas, R. J. (1988) ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, pp. 3–42.
Michel, P. (1991) ‘Economic Growth from a Normative Point of View: Historical Background and New Considerations’, Working paper. No. 91A13, GREQE.
Moulin, H. (1988) Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phelps, E. S. (1961) ‘The Golden-Rule of Accumulation: A Fable for Growth Men’, American Economic Review, vol. 51, pp. 638–43.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Romer, P. M. (1986) ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, pp. 1002–37.
Romer, P. M. (1989) ‘Capital Accumulation in the Theory of Long-Run Growth’, in R. J. Barrow, (ed.), Modern Business Cycle Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Samuelson, P. A. (1958) ‘An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 66, pp. 467–82.
Solow, R. M. (1974) ‘Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies, Symposium, pp. 29–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
d’Aspremont, C., Gérard-Varet, LA., Michel, P. (2000). Intergenerational Equity in a Model of Endogenous Growth. In: Gérard-Varet, LA., Kolm, SC., Ythier, J.M. (eds) The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-62747-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-62745-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)