Abstract
In June 1997, the Moscow Art Theatre organized an international conference to celebrate its centennial. Robert Brustein, on his first visit to Russia, described the atmosphere as more like a peace conference than a theatre conference. Brustein writes: ‘[T]he whole complicated affair had been carefully engineered by the theatre’s brilliant and personable literary director, Anatoly Smeliansky—an expert ironically enough, on Mikhail Bulgakov, one of Stanislavskys most unforgiving critics.” Recognizing that many of the old rivalries were represented at the conference— including Yuri Lyubimov, former director of the Taganka Theatre and a follower of Meyerhold—Brustein concludes: “The chorus of praise for Stanislavsky and the ecumenical atmosphere of the proceedings were somewhat surprising—considering how many present had broken off into radically different theatrical directions.”1 In short, the conference became a forum for unity between Stanislavsky and those who diverged from his Russian System.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Robert Brustein, “The Heritage of MAT,” The New Republic 217.6-7 (August 11, 1997): 29.
Richard Hornby, The End of Acting: A Radical View (New York: Applause, 1992), 5
John Harrop, Acting (London: Roudedge, 1992).
Christine Edwards, The Stanislavski Heritage: Its Contribution to the American and Russian Theatre (New York: New York University Press, 1965), 271.
Ronald A. Willis, “American Laboratory Theatre,” TDR 9.1 (Fall 1964): 115.
Foster Hirsch, A Method to Their Madness: A History of the Actors Studio (New York: Norton, 1984), 72.
Wendy Smith, Real Life Drama: The Group Theatre and America (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1990), 424–25.
Marianne Conroy, “Acting Out: Method Acting, The National Culture, and the Middlebrow Disposition in Cold War America,” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 35.2 (Spring 1993): 247.
Elia Kazan, A Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988), 143.
Stephen Harvey, “Another Mans Method,” American Film 8.7 (1983): 69.
See Foster Hirsh, “The Actors Studio at 50,” for testimonials by Method actors, American Theatre 15.1 (January 1998): 24–29.
Marvin Carlson, Theories of the Theatre (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), 377.
[Euvgeny] Vakhtangov, “Preparing for the Role,” Acting: A Handbook of the Stanislavski Method, Toby Cole, ed., B. E. Zakhara, tr. (New York: Crown Trade, 1955), 120.
Mel Gordon, The Stanislavsky Technique (New York: Applause, 1987), 83.
Sanford Meisner, “The Reality of Doing,” TDR 9.1 (Fall 1964): 140.
Stella Adler, “The Reality of Doing,” TDR 9.1 (Fall 1964): 141.
Sharon M. Carnicke, “Stanislavsky: Uncensored and Unabridged,” TDR 37.1 (Spring 1993): 24
Joseph R. Roach, The Player’s Passion: Studies in the Science of Acting (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993), 213.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2000 David Krasner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gordon, M. (2000). Salvaging Strasberg at the Fin De Siècle. In: Krasner, D. (eds) Method Acting Reconsidered. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62271-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62271-9_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-312-22309-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-62271-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)