Abstract
Although Taiwan had one of the most anti-communist governments in the world its political system, prior to its democratization in 1986, resembled that in communist countries such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or the former Soviet Union. The majority of existing works suggest that its ruling party, the Kuomintang (KMT), was quasi-Leninist or was organized along Leninist lines.1 Leninist or not, the KMT started a process of democratization by which it dismantled itself as a party state, transformed the political system into a democracy and itself into a democratic party within ten years. This occurred while Taiwan continued to grow rapidly economically and maintained social order and political stability. Since the KMT has also managed to retain political power through open and fair elections this ‘quiet revolution’ should provide a shining example for Leninist party states which may contemplate political changes.2 It appears that the KMT experience should have particular relevance for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) state in the PRC.3
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See for example B.J. Dickson, ‘The Lessons of Defeat: The Reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950–52’, The China Quarterly, no. 133, March 1993, 56–84; Tun-jen Cheng, ‘Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan’, World Politics, vol. 41, July 1989, 471–99;
J.A. Robinson, ‘The KMT as a Leninist Regime: Prolegomenon to Devolutionary Leadership Through Institutions’, The Political Chronicle: The Journal of the Florida Political Science Association, vol. 3, no. 1, 1991, 1–8; and
C.S. Meaney, ‘Liberalization, Democratization, and the Role of the KMT’, in T.J. Cheng and S. Haggard (eds), Political Change in Taiwan (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1992) 95.
Hung-mao Tien also describes the Kuomintang as organized on the Leninist model though he stresses that it was committed to a different ideology: Hung-mao Tien, The Great Transition: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1989), 1. For a dissenting view which describes the Kuomintang as a political sect, see
R.H. Myers and L. Chao, ‘A New Kind of Party: The Kuomintang of 1949–1952’, in Proceedings of Centennial Symposium on Sun Yat-sen’s Founding of the Kuomintang for Revolution Volume IV: Republic of China on Taiwan (1950–1993) (Taipei: Chin-tao Chung-kuo ch’u-pan-she, 1995), 26–44.
The term is borrowed from Jason Hu (ed.), Quiet Revolutions in Taiwan (Taipei: Kwang Hwa Press, 1994).
This question has also been explored in part by B.J. Dickson in ‘The Kuomintang before Democratization: Organizational Change and the Role of Elections’, in Hung-mao Tien (ed.), Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1996), 42–78.
Ch’in Hsiao-i (comp.), Tsung-t’ung Chiang Kung ssu-hsiang yen-lun tsungchi: yen-chiang, vol. 24 (Taipei: Chung-kuo Kuo-min-tang tang-shih wei-yuan-hui, 1984) (hereafter: Chiang Kai-shek, Tsung-chi), 46.
Steve Tsang, ‘Revitalising the Revolution: Chiang Kai-shek’s Approach to Political Reform in the 1950s’, in Proceedings of Centennial Symposium on Sun Yat-sen’s Founding of the Kuomintang for Revolution Volume IV: Republic of China on Taiwan (1950–1993) (Taipei: Chin-tao Chung-kuo ch’u-pan-she, 1995), 49.
Chiang and his wife reportedly kept cyanide capsules with them and prepared themselves to perish with Taiwan if necessary. K.C. Wu, Wu Kuo-chen Chuan (Taipei: Tzu-yu Shih-pao, 1995), 50.
Harry S. Truman Library (Independence, Missouri), Archives of Harry S. Truman, President’s Secretary’s Papers Box 257, ORE7–50, 20 March 1950, 3. For a study of the US policy of waiting until the dust settles, see Nancy Tucker, Pattern in the Dust: Chinese-American Relations and the Recognition Controversy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).
Fu Cheng, Lei Chen yu Cheng-tang Cheng-chi (Taipei: Kuei-kuan T’u-shu, 1989), 84.
See Ch’en T’ieh-chien and Huang Tao-hsuan, Chiang Chieh-shih yu Chung-kuo Wen-hua (Hong Kong: Chung-hua shu-ch’u, 1992).
S.H. Chang and L.H.D. Gordon, All Under Heaven: Sun Yat-sen and His Revolutionary Thought (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1991), 121.
R.H. Myers (ed.), Two Societies in Opposition: The Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China After forty years (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1991), xviii.
Reproduced in English in S.R. Schram, The Political Thought of Mao Tse-tung (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1969), 313.
For a comparative study of the Kuomintang and Chinese communist political officer/commissar system, see Cheng Hsiao-shih, Party-Military Relations in the PRC and Taiwan: Paradoxes of Control (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1990).
Kang Lu-tao, Li Kuo-ting K’ou-shu Li-shih (Taipei: Cho-yueh wen-hua, 1993), 142–3, 172.
K.T. Li, The Evolution of Policy Behind Taiwan’s Development Success (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988), 54.
This concept is being defined in a slightly different way by Ramon Myers as ‘the zone that contains power, symbols, and institutions that allocate and project power’ but is ‘constrained by the existence of economic and ideological marketplaces’ . Ramon Myers, ‘Transferring the Republic of China’s Modernisation Experience to the People’s Republic of China’, in G. Klintworth (ed.), Taiwan in the Asia-Pacific in the 1990s (St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 1994), 172.
Hermann Halbeisen, ‘In Search of a New Political Order? Political Reform in Taiwan’, in Steve Tsang (ed.), In the Shadow of China: Political Developments in Taiwan since 1949 (London: Hurst & Co., 1993), 75.
Li Sung-lin, Chiang Chieh-shih te T’ai-wan Shih-tai (Taipei: Feng-yun shih-tai, 1993), 372.
Tun-jen Cheng & Stephen Haggard, ‘Regime Transformation in Taiwan’, in T.J. Cheng & S. Haggard (eds), Political Change in Taiwan (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992), 7.
Cheng Mu-hsin, T’ai-wan I-hui Cheng-chi Ssu-shih-nien (Taipei: Chih-li wan-pao ch’u-pan-she, 1987), 147 and 152.
For a graphic insider’ s account of how local elections were manipulated by the party state, see Kao Ming-fei, Ch’ing-chih Tan-an (Taipei: Business Weekly, 1995), 49–158.
Yun-han Chu, Crafting Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Institute for National Policy Research, 1992), 50.
Lei’s writings on the question of democracy published in the Free China Fortnightly are now readily accessible in Fu Cheng (ed.), Lei Chen yu Min-chu Hsien-cheng (2 vols), (Taipei: Kuei-kuan T’u-shu, 1989).
Ma Chih-su, Lei Chan yu Chiang Chieh-shih (Taipei: Tsu-li Wan-pao, 1993), 232–9.
H.E. Salisbury, The New Emperors: China in the Era of Mao and Deng (New York: Avon Books, 1992), 137;
R. MacFarquhar, The Origins of the Cultural Revolution 1: Contradictions Among the People 1956–1957 (London: Oxford University Press, 1974), 314.
Lih-wu Han, Taiwan Today (Taipei: Cheng Chung Book Company, 1988), 260; The Republic of China Yearbook 1995, 336.
Ironically, the best insider account of how the Kuomintang did so is the memoirs of a Taiwanese Independence activist, Peng Ming-min. See Peng Ming-min, A Taste of Freedom: Memoirs of a Formosan Independence Leader (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972).
Harvey Feldman, ‘A New Kind of Relationship’ , in R.H. Myers (ed.), A Unique Relationship: The United States and the Republic of China Under the Taiwan Relations Act (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1989), 41.
Jaushieh Joseph Wu, Taiwan’s Democratization: Forces Behind the New Momentum (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1995), 40–1.
Yung Yuan, Wo tsai Chiang Chieh-shih Fu-tzu Shen-pien teh Jih-tzu (Taipei: Shu-hua ch’u-pan-she, 1994), 261–2, 266–70.
Hau Pei-ts’ un, Hao Tsung-chang Jih-chi chung te Ching- kuo Hsien-sheng Wan-nien (Taipei: Tien-hsia wen-hua, 1995), 213–45, 260.
Chiao Chiao Hsieh, Strategy for Survival: The Foreign Policy and External Relations of the Republic of China on Taiwan, 1949–79 (London: The Sherwood Press, 1985), Appendix 4b.
Steven W. Mosher, China Misperceived: American Illusions and Chinese Reality (n.p: New Republic Book, 1990), 194.
Kuo Li-min (ed.), Chung-kung Tui-t’ai Cheng-ts’e Tzu- liao Hsuan-chi, vol. 2, (Taipei: Yung-yeh ch’u-pan-she, 1992), 328–31.
Li Sung-lin, Chiang Ching-kuo te T’ai-wan shih-tai (Taipei: Feng-yun shih-tai, 1993), 87.
For the negotiations see Robert Cottrell, The End of Hong Kong: The Secret Diplomacy of /mperial Retreat (London: John Murray, 1993), and
S. Tsang, Hong Kong: Appointment with China (London: I. B. Tauris, 1997), 81–110.
Simon Long, Taiwan: China’s Last Frontier (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991), 180.
P.H. Chang, ‘Changing Nature of Taiwan’s Politics’, in D.F. Simon and M.Y.M. Kau (eds.), Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1992), 31.
Term coined by Bill Jenner in W.J.F. Jenner, The Tyranny of History: The Roots of China’s Crisis (London: Penguin, 1992).
Archie Brown, The Gorbachev Factor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 310.
Examples of such publications include: Kuo Chuan-erh (ed.), Chung-kuo Kuo-min-tang T’ai-wan Szu-shih nien Shih- kang (Peking: Chung-kuo wen-shih ch’u-pan-she, 1993);
T’ai-wan Yen-chiu-hui (ed.) Chiu-shih Nien-tai chih T’ai-wan (Peking: You-i Ch’u-pan, 1993); and
Sung Ch’un and Lou Chieh, ‘Lung Kuo-min-tang te ti-i-ch’i kai-tsao yun-tung’, in T’ai-wan Yen-chiu, 1989, no. 3.
Kenneth Liberthal, Governing China: From Revolution Through Reform (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1995), 453.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Steven Tsang
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tsang, S. (1999). Transforming a Party State into a Democracy. In: Tsang, S., Hung-mao, T. (eds) Democratization in Taiwan. St Antony’s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27279-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27279-2_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-76357-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27279-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)