Skip to main content

From Market Socialism to Social Market?

  • Chapter
Book cover Riding the Tiger
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Our analysis has sought to show the clash between the economic and political logic of the reforms and provide an explanation of the paradoxical outcome of the reform era, a combination of economic success and political failure. To the extent that the economic reforms were the spearhead of an attempt to resuscitate the political fortunes of Chinese state socialism, they were a dismal failure. In the context of the early 1990s, the question of political reform clearly needs to be tackled, not only because this is a precondition for deepening the process of economic reform, but also because the present political system has suffered a serious decline in its authority and the national leadership has increasingly lost its power to define policy and control events. To think sensibly about political reform, we not only need to look forward towards possible future scenarios but also look back at the political changes brought about by the era of economic reform which define the political parameters for what is both desirable and possible in the foreseeable future. So let us look back first and then forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Wade, ‘State intervention in “outward-looking” development: neoclassical theory and Taiwanese practice’, in White (ed.) 1988; see also Hung-mao Tien 1989 and Winckler 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1993 Douglas Gordon White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, G. (1993). From Market Socialism to Social Market?. In: Riding the Tiger. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22651-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics