Skip to main content

Buddha or the Ballot: The Buddhist Exception to Universal Suffrage in Contemporary Asia

  • Chapter

Abstract

In the spate of little more than a year, between August 2007 and September 2008, three countries with predominantly Buddhist populations enacted new constitutions. In the case of Thailand, this was just the last iteration of a turbulent constitutional history that goes back to 1932, when the absolute monarchy was overthrown. Yet it constituted a first step toward a return of some semblance of democratic processes, which had been put on hold after the army’s ‘royalist’ coup d’état against the Thaksin Shinawatra government in September 2006.l In the case of Burma/Myanmar, the promulgation of a new constitution marked an even more significant step in the country’s transition from outright military rule toward a more democratic political system.2 For Bhutan, the new constitution was the first of its kind, marking the end to an era of quasi-absolute monarchical rule in the Himalayan state.3 In all three states, then, the enactment of new constitutions was part and parcel of a process of reform intended to make their political systems appear more democratic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Winichakul, T. (2008) ‘Toppling Democracy,’ Journal of Contemporary Asia 38, 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Englehart, N. (2012) ‘Two Cheers for Burma’s Rigged Election,’ Asian Survey 52, 666–86;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, R. (2012) ‘Myanmar,’ Asian Affairs 43, 221–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sinpeng, A. (2007) ‘Democracy from Above,’ Journal of Bhutan Studies 17, 21–48;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, M. et al. (2011) ‘Democratization by Decree,’ Democratization 18, 184–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Massicotte, L. et al. (2004) Establishing the Rules of the Game (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Temperman, J. (2010) State-Religion Relationships and Human Rights Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 327–28.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsson, T. (2015) ‘Monkish Politics in Southeast Asia,’ Modern Asian Studies 49, 40–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindberg Falk, M. (2007) Making Fields of Merit (Copenhagen: MAS), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gravers, M. (2013) ‘Spiritual Politics, Political Religion, and Religious Freedom in Burma,’ The Review of Faith and International Affairs 11, 46–54;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. See Kuru, A. T. (2011), ‘Passive and Assertive Secularism,’ World Politics 59, 568–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. see Ketelaar, J. (1990) Of Heretics and Martyrs in Meiji Japan (Princeton: Princeton University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mason, R. H. P. (1969) Japan’s First General Election 1890 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harris, I. (2012) Buddhism in a Dark Age (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Bowie, K. (2010) ‘Women’s Suffrage in Thailand,’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 52, 708–41;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. and Loos, T. (2004) ‘The Politics of Women’s Suffrage in Thailand,’ in L. Edwards and M. Roces (eds.) Women’s Suffrage in Asia (London: Routledge Curzon).

    Google Scholar 

  17. see Sreang, H. (2008), ‘The Scope and Limitations of Political Participation by Buddhist Monks,’ in A. Kent and D. Chandler (eds.) People of Virtue: Reconfiguring Religion, Power and Morality in Cambodia Today (Copenhagen: NIAS).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Lynch, D. C. (2004) ‘International “Decentering” and Democratization,’ International Studies Quarterly 48, 339–62;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. and Lynch, D. C. (2006) Rising China and Asian Democratization (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dahl, R. (1989) Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stepan, A. C. (2000) ‘Religion, Democracy, and the “Twin Tolerations”,’ Journal of Democracy 11, p. 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Streckfuss, D., and Templeton, M. (2002), ‘Human Rights and Political Reform in Thailand,’ in D. McCargo (ed.) Reforming Thai Politics (Copenhagen: NIAS), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gentile, E. (2006) Politics as Religion (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Taylor, R. (2009) The State in Myanmar (Singapore: NUS Press), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brennan, J. (2011) The Ethics of Voting (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hongladarom, S., and K. Hongladarom (2011), ‘Cyber-Buddhism,’ in U. Mårtensson et al. (eds.) Tundamentalism in the Modern World (2) (London: IB Taurus), p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Katz, R. (1997) Democracy and Elections (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Queen, C. S. (1996b), ‘Introduction,’ in C. Queen and S. King (eds.) Engaged Buddhism (Albany: SUNY).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harding, A. (2007), ‘Buddhism, Human Rights and Constitutional Reform in Thailand,’ Asian Journal of Comparative Law 2, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jordt, I. (2007) Burma’s Mass Lay Meditation Movement (Athens: Ohio University Press), pp. 236–37.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Puntarigvivat, T. ‘Phrasong Thai Kap Sitthi Nai Kan Lueak Tang,’ Matichon, 19 December 2004, p. 6;

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Tambiah, S. (1992) Buddhism Betrayed? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press);

    Google Scholar 

  33. and Satha-anand, S. (2003) ‘Buddhist Pluralism and Religious Tolerance in Democratizing Thailand,’ in P. Cam (ed.) Philosophy, Democracy and Education (Seoul: Korean National Commission for UNESCO).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lintner, B. (2009) The Resistance of the Monks (New York: Human Rights Watch), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Asian Network for Free Elections (2009) Vision of a Blueprint (Bangkok: ANFREL), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See Meisburger, T. (2009), Constitutional Reform and Democracy in Thailand (Bangkok: Asia Foundation), pp. 12, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Asian Network for Free Elections (2001) The Emergence of New Politics in Thailand (Bangkok: ANFREL).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Asian Network for Free Elections (2005) 2005 Mission Report, pp. 46–47 (Bangkok: ANFREL).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Asian Network for Free Elections, 2005 Mission Report, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Asian Network for Free Elections (2007) Thailand Restoring Democracy (Bangkok ANFREL).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Asian Network for Free Elections (2012) Thailand General Election (Bangkok ANFREL), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beech, H. (2013), ‘Straying from the Middle Way,’ Time, 20 June 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Tomas Larsson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larsson, T. (2016). Buddha or the Ballot: The Buddhist Exception to Universal Suffrage in Contemporary Asia. In: Kawanami, H. (eds) Buddhism and the Political Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57400-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics