The “modern” in “modern science” is a relatively uninterrogated and untheorized concept within the sciences and in the philosophy, sociology, and history of science. This is so today at a time when other aspects of Western sciences have been fruitfully explored in critical and illuminating ways (see Christensen and Hansen, Chap. 13; and Skovsmose, Chap. 15). In particular, the exceptionalism and triumphalism characteristic of Western attitudes toward our sciences have been explicitly criticized and purportedly abandoned by many of the scholars working in science studies fields. By exceptionalism is meant the belief that Western sciences alone among all human knowledge systems are capable of grasping reality in its own terms—that these alone have the resources to escape the human tendency to project onto nature cultural assumptions, fears, and desires. By triumphalism is meant the assumption that the history of science consists of a history of achievements — that this history has no significant downsides. According to this view, Hiroshima, environmental destruction, the alienation of labour, escalating global militarism, the increasing gap between the “haves” and the ”have nots,” gender, race, and class inequalities — these and other undesirable social situations are all entirely consequences of social and political projects, to which the history of Western sciences makes no contribution. Such conventional Euro centric assumptions can no longer gather the support either in the West or elsewhere that they could once claim
In recent decades a huge amount of literature on modernity has emerged from the social sciences and humanities. Stimulated by the massive shifts in local and global social formations during the last half of the Twentieth Century, and by the post-modern response to such changes, social theorists, literary and other cultural critics, and, especially, historians have debated the uneven and complex origins, nature, and desirable futures of modernity, modernization, and modernism. Such controversies about modernity are first and foremost about a culture's relation to its past and its possible futures. They arise as ways of asking what went wrong, and what needs to be corrected. The last half a century has witnessed the global decline and fall of belief in the unquestionably legitimate authority of the white, bourgeois, male. Contributing to the epistemological, economic, political, and cultural rubble left by his demise — or, at least, deflation — have been compelling and influential counter-histories of social relations between the races, classes, genders, and within colonial and imperial eras
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Amin, S. (1997). Capitalism in the Age of Globalisation: The Management of Contemporary Society. New York: Zed Books
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage
Beck, U. (1997). The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity
Beck, U. (1999). World Risk Society. Oxford: Blackwell
Biagioli, M. (Ed.) (1999). The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge
Boyd, W. (1993). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Economic Geography, 69(4), 432–436
Braidotti, R. et al. (1994). Women, the Environment, and Sustainable Development. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed
Brockway, L.H. (1979). Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanical Gardens. New York: Academic Press
Castells, M. (1996–1998). The Information Age: Economy, Society & Culture (vol. 1–3). Oxford: Blackwell
Draper, E. (1993). Risk, Society, and Social Theory. Contemporary Sociology, 22(5), 641–644
Eisenstadt, S.N. (2000). Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–30
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Felski, R. (1995). The Gender of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Gole, N. (2000). Snapshots of Islamic Modernities. Daedalus. 129(1), 91–117
Goonatilake, S. (1984). Aborted Discovery: Science and Creativity in the Third World. London: Zed
Haraway, D. (1989). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge
Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Harding, S. (1998a). Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Harding, S. (1998b). Gender, Modernity, Knowledge: Postcolonial Standpoints. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies (pp. X–XX). Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Harding, S. (Ed.) (2003). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York: Routledge
Harding, S. (2006). Science and Social Inequality?: Feminist and Postcolonial Perspectives. Edwardsville: University of Illinois Press
Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialisms, and Modernities. Durham: Duke University Press
Headrick, D.R. (Ed.) (1981). The Tool of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press
Hess, D.J. (1995). Science and Technology in a Multicultural World: The Cultural Politics of Facts and Artifacts. New York: Columbia University Press
Jardine, A. (1985). Gynesis: Configurations of Woman and Modernity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Joseph, G.G. (1991). The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics. New York: I.B.Tauris
Kelly-Gadol, J. (1976). The Social Relation of the Sexes: Methodological Implications of Women's History Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), X–XX
Kleinman, D.L. & Vallas, S.P. (2001). Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the ‘Knowledge Worker’: The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States. Theory and Society, 30, 451–492
Kochhar, R.K. (1992–1993). Science in British India (parts I and II). Current Science, 63(11), 689–694; 64, 55–62
Lach, D.F. (1977). Asia in the Making of Europe (vol. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lal, V. (Ed.) (2000). Dissenting Knowledges, Open Futures: The Multiple Selves and Strange Destinations of Ashis Nandy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
McClellan, J.E. (1992). Colonialism and Science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Mies, M. (1986). Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labor. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed
Murata, J. (2003). Creativity of Technology and the Modernisation Process of Japan. In R. Figueroa & S. Harding (Eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology (pp. X–XX). New York: Routledge
Nandy, A. (1983). The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press
Nandy, A. (1988) Science as a Reason of State. In A. Nandy (Ed.), Science, Hegemony, and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity (pp. X–XX). New Delhi: Oxford University Press
Needham, J. (1954) Science and Civilisation in China (7 vols). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Needham, J. (1969). The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
New, C. (1994). Class Society or Risk Society? Radical Philosophy, 66(56)
Noble, D. (1992). A World Without Women: The Christian Clerical Culture of Western Science. New York: Knopf
Noble, D. (1995). The Religion of Technology. New York: Knopf
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity
Ortiz, R. (2000). From Incomplete Modernity to World Modernity. Daedalus, 29(1), 249–260
Petitjean, P., Jami, C. & Moulin, A.M. (Eds.) (1992). Science and Empires: Historical Studies About Scientific Development and European Expansion. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Philip, K. (2003). Civilising Natures: Race, Resources and Modernity in Colonial South India. New Delhi: Orient Longman
Prakash, G. (1999). Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Proctor, R. (1988). Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Reingold, Nathan, and Marc Rothenberg, eds. (1987) Scientific Colonialism. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press
Sabra, I.A. (1976). The Scientific Enterprise. In B. Lewis (Ed.), The World of Islam. London: Thames and Hudson
Sachs, W. (Ed.) (1992). The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed
Sardar, Z. (Ed.) (1988). The Revenge of Athena: Science, Exploitation, and the Third World. London: Mansell
Selin, H. (Ed.) (1997). Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Shiva, V. (1989). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. London: Zed
Sparr, P. (Ed.) (1994). Mortgaging Women's Lives: Feminist Critiques of Structural Adjustment. London: Zed
Third World Network (1988). Modern Science in Crisis: A Third World Response. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network
Van den Daele, W. (1977). The Social Construction of Science. In E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart & R. Whitley (Eds.), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge (pp. X–XX). Dordrecht: Reidel
Watson-Verran, H. & Turnbull, D. (1995). Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, T. Pinch, & J. Petersen (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 115–139). Thousand Oaks: Sage
Wittrock, B. (2000). Modernity: One, None, or Many? European Origins and Modernity as a Global Condition. Daedalus, 129(1), 31–60
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harding, S. (2009). Modernities, Sciences, and Democracy. In: Skovsmose, O., Valero, P., Christensen, O.R. (eds) University Science and Mathematics Education in Transition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09829-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09829-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09828-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09829-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)