Abstract
The sociological theory of the “dual character of social systems” explains the role and the character of social movements and is applied here to environmental problems. This theory argues that all forms of social organization contain two analytically different systems of social control: a system of domination and a system of management. In reality, these two are merged into each other. But making the analytical distinction reveals the nature of the interaction between movements and governmental offices. In this view, government and movements generate three types of problem-solving processes. The first type involves the management system, where governments and movements cooperate to solve social problems. The second type involves the domination system, where the government subordinates and imposes sufferings on residents, turning them into victims. These victims then organize social movements to resist their oppressor. In the third type, “cooperative problem solving by opposing actors,” systems of domination and management interact. Government and movement actors, though having opposed interests nevertheless find a cooperative way to produce mutually beneficial solutions. The solution of environmental problems, now so universal, requires intervention into and reorganization of the economic system. This intervention proceeds through four stages: (A) Lack of constraints on the economic system, (B) Imposition of constraints, (C) Incorporation of environmental concern as a secondary management task, and (D) Incorporation of environmental concern as a primary management task. In order to push this reorganization toward stage D, environmental movements must acquire more capacity for cooperative problem solving with government in the management of problems, and also to resist when deprived by the domination system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A surplus good is defined as the difference between the goods produced by the cooperation of a certain number of persons (G(Σi)) and the sum of goods produced separately by the same number of persons (Σ G(i)). S= G(Σi)−Σ G(i).
- 2.
The reason I chose these three cases is simple; I have directly carried on these case studies and they are adequate for the discussion of this section. Using other cases, we can perhaps develop similar theoretical reflection.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Iijima and Funabashi (1999) presented the first systematic sociological study of the Niigata area Minamata disease.
- 6.
Description of this case is based on Suginami-shouyoukinen-zaidan (1983) and my own fieldwork.
References
Funabashi, H. 1980. “Kyodorenkan no Ryogisei: Keiei-shisutemu to Shihai-shisuteme” (Dual Character of the Social System: Management System and Domination System). pp. 209–231 in Gendai Shakai no Shakaigaku, edited by G. S. Kenkyukai. Tokyo: Kawashimasyoten.
Funabashi, H. 1992. “Environmental Problems in Postwar Japanese Society”. International Journal of Japanese Sociology 1:3–18.
Funabashi, H. 2004. “Intervention of the Environmental Control System in the Economic System and the Environmental Cluster”. pp. 137–159 in The Environmental Challenges for Japan and Germany: Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by G. Szell and K. Tominaga. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Funabashi, H. 2006. “Minamata Disease and Environmental Governance”. International Journal of Japanese Sociology 15:7–25.
George, T. S, 2001. Minamata: Pollution and the Struggle for Democracy in Postwar Japan, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Asia Center.
Harada, M. 2004. Minamata Disease, Kumamoto Nichinichi Shinbun Culture and Information Center (Translated by T. Sachie and T. S. George, translation edited by T. S. George).
Ide, T. 1990. Kogai: Mikansei Koukoukyoku (Pollution: unfinished symphony). Tokyo: Kyoudou-tosho-service.
Iijima, N. 1979. Pollution Japan: Historical Chronology. Tokyo: Asahi Evening Press.
Iijima, N. and H. Funabashi (eds). 1999. Niigata Minamatabyo Mondai: Kagai to Higai no Shakaigaku (Environmental Sociology of Niigata Minamata Disease). Tokyou: Toshindou.
Lawrence, P. R. and J. Lorsch. 1967. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Spaargaren,G., A. P. J. Mol and F. H. Buttel (eds). 2000. Environment and Global Modernity. London: SAGE.
Suginami-shouyoukinen-zaidan. 1983. “Tokyou-gomi-sensou”: Takaido Jumin no Kiroku (“Tokyou Garvage War”: historical record of residents in Takaido). Tokyo: Suginami-shouyoukinen-zaidan.
Touraine, A. 1973. Production de la société. Paris: Édition de Seuil.
Ui, J. 1992. “Minamata Disease”. pp. 103–132 in Industrial Pollution in Japan, edited by J. Ui. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Yorimoto, K. 1981. Genba no Shiso to Chiho-jichi (A thought based on field and local self-government). Tokyo: Gakuyou-shobou.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Funabashi, H. (2011). The Duality of Social Systems and the Environmental Movement in Japan. In: Broadbent, J., Brockman, V. (eds) East Asian Social Movements. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09626-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09626-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09625-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09626-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)