Skip to main content

Resistivity Characterization of Aquifer in Coastal Semiarid Areas: An Approach for Hydrogeological Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Groundwater in the Nile Delta

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 73))

Abstract

In coastal and semiarid regions, the scientific interest lies in imaging the saltwater intrusion and delineating freshwater aquifer zones, respectively. Direct current resistivity (DCR) and induced polarization (IP) geophysical methods are commonly used to assess hydraulic characteristics of the aquifer. Particularly, the main reason for hydrogeophysical application of both DCR and IP is that the electrical characteristics of aquifers depend mainly on the geometry of the pore space and the porosity controlling the soil and rock effective transport properties. For preliminary hydrogeological investigations, these methods are applied at a wide range of field and laboratory scales. Accordingly, the vulnerable zone to the saltwater intrusion and/or contamination can be characterized by high accuracy. Furthermore, empirical and semiempirical relationships are widely used to predict the aquifer petrophysical characteristics, e.g., hydraulic conductivity, using the inversion results of such electrical methods. Equally, conventional and nonconventional DCR inversion algorithms are developed to reduce the nonuniqueness problem of actual resistivity interpretation and, consequently, to obtain more meaningful models than previously reported. As case histories, this chapter demonstrates the efficiency of DCR method for hydrogeological assessment in Nile Delta, Egypt, emphasizing on technical constraints to achieve sustainable development in coastal and semiarid areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Steuer A, Siemon B, Auken E (2009) A comparison of helicopter borne electromagnetics in frequency and time domain at the Cuxhaven valley in Northern Germany. Appl Geophys Sci 67:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Attwa M, Basokur A, Akca I (2014) Hydraulic conductivity estimation using direct current (DC) sounding data: a case study in East Nile Delta Egypt. Hydrgeol J 22:1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040–014–1107-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronczka M, Hellman K, Günther T, Wisén R, Dahlin T (2017) Electric resistivity and seismic refraction tomography: a challenging joint underwater survey at Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory. Solid Earth Sci 8:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Attwa M, Gemail KS, Eleraki M (2016) Use of salinity and resistivity measurements to study the coastal aquifer salinization in a semi-arid region: a case study in northeast Nile Delta Egypt. Environ Earth Sci 75:784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5585-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goebela M, Adam P, Rosemary K (2017) Resistivity imaging reveals complex pattern of saltwater intrusion along Monterey coast. Hydrol Sci 551:746–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farid A, Khalid P, Jadoon KZ, Jouini MS (2014) The depositional setting of the late quaternary sedimentary fill in southern Bannu basin northwest Himalayan fold and thrust belt Pakistan environ. Monit Assess Sci 8:6587–6604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muhammad M, Khalid P (2017) Hydrogeophysical investigations for assessing the groundwater potential in part of the Peshawar basin Pakistan. Arab J Sci Eng Sci 42:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olatunji S, Musa A (2014) Estimation of aquifer hydraulic characteristics from surface geoelectrical methods: case study of the Rima basin North Western Nigeria. Arab Sci Eng 39:5475–5487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Binley A, Hubbard S, Huisman J, Revil A, Robinson D, Singha K, Slater L (2015) The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales. Water Resour Res Sci 51:3837–3866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park S, Yi M-J, Kim J-H, Shin SW (2015) Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) monitoring for groundwater contamination in an uncontrolled landfill South Korea. J Appl Geophys 135:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Attwa M, Günther T (2013) Spectral induced polarization measurements for predicting the hydraulic conductivity in sandy aquifers. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:4079–4094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Revil A, Binley A, Mejus L, Kessouri P (2015) Predicting permeability from the characteristic relaxation time and intrinsic formation factor of complex conductivity spectra. Water Resour Res 8:6672–6700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed AS, Jardani A, Revil A, Dupont JP (2016) Specific storage and hydraulic conductivity tomography through the joint inversion of hydraulic heads and self-potential data. Adv Water Resour 89:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maineult A, Jougnot D, Revil A (2017) Variations of petrophysical properties and spectral induced polarization in response to drainage and imbibition: a study on a correlated random tube network. Geophys J Int. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shevnin V, Rodríguez OD, Mousatov A, Hernández DF, Martínez HZ, Ryjov A (2006) Estimation of soil petrophysical parameters from resistivity data: their application for oil contaminated sites characterization. Geophys J Int 45(3):179–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aizebeokhai AP (2009) Geoelectrical resistivity imaging in environmental studies. In: Yanful EK (ed) Appropriate technologies for environmental protection in the developing world. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 297–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Knoedel K, Lange G, Voigt H (2005) Direct resistivity methods. In: Environmental geology: handbook of field methods and case studies. Springer, New York, pp 205–237

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weller A, Slater L, Nordsiek S, Ntarlagiannis D (2010) On the estimation of specific surface per unit pore volume from induced polarization: a robust empirical relation fits multiple datasets. Geophysics 4:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Revil A, Kessouri P, Torres-Verdín C (2014) Electrical conductivity induced polarization and permeability of the Fontainebleau sandstone. Geophysics 5:301–318. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0036.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Revil A, Florsch N, Camerlynck C (2014) Spectral induced polarization porosimetry. Geophysics 198:1016–1033

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang M, Revil A (2010) Electrochemical charge of silica surface at high ionic strength in narrow channels. Journal of Coll Interface Sci 343:381–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Falkenhagen H (1934) Electrolytes. Oxford University, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schwarz G (1962) A theory of the low-frequency dielectric dispersion of colloidal particles in electrolyte solution. J Phys Chem 66:2636–2642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Leroy P, Revil A, Kemna A, Cosenza P, Ghorbani A (2008) Spectralinduced polarization of water-saturated packs of glass beads. J Colloid Interface Sci 321:103–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall DJ, Madden TR (1959) Induced polarization a study of its causes. Geophysics 24:790–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bücker M, Hördt A (2013) Analytical modelling of membrane polarization with explicit parametrization of pore radii and the electrical double layer. Geophysics 194:804–813

    Google Scholar 

  27. Attwa M (2012) Field application “Data acquisition processing and inversion”. In: Attwa M (ed) Electrical methods: practical guide for resistivity imaging and hydrogeophysics. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH and Co KG, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp 70–98

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li Y, Oldenburg DW (1992) Approximate inverse mappings in DC resistivity problems. Geophys J Int 109:343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Martorana R, Lombardo L, Messina N, Luzio D (2013) Integrated geophysical survey for 3D modeling of a coastal aquifer polluted by seawater. Near Surf Geophys 11. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873–0604.2013006

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vinegar HJ, Waxman MH (1984) Induced polarization of shaly sands. Geophysics 49:1267–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vinegar HJ, Waxman MH (1987) In-situ method for determining pore size distribution capillary pressure and permeability. US Patent Sci 4:644–283

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mazac O, Cislerova M, Kelly WE, Landa I, Venhodova D (1990) Determination of hydraulic conductivities by surface geoelectrical methods. In: Ward SH (ed) Geotechnical and environmental geophysics, vol 2. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp 125–131

    Google Scholar 

  33. Slater L (2007) Near surface electrical characterization of hydraulic conductivity: from petrophysical properties to aquifer geometries – a review. Surv Geophys 28:169–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Börner FD, Schopper W, Weller A (1996) Evaluation of transport and storage properties in the soils and groundwater zone from induced polarization measurements. Geophysics 44:583–601

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pape H, Riepe L, Schopper JR (1987) Theory of self-similar network structures in sedimentary and igneous rocks and their investigation with microscopical and physical methods. Microscopy 148:121–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hördt A, Druiventak A, Blaschek R, Binot F, Kemna A, Kreye P, Zisser N (2009) Case histories of hydraulic conductivity estimation with induced polarization at the field scale. Near Surf Geophys 7:529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Slater L, Lesmes D (2002) Electric-hydraulic relationships observed for unconsolidated sediments. Water Resour Res 10:1213. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR00107.2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zisser N, Kemna A, Nover G (2010) Relationship between low-frequency electrical properties and hydraulic permeability of low-permeability sandstones. Geophysics 3:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Silvester PP, Ferrari RL (1990) Finite elements for electrical engineers. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 516 p

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sasaki Y (1994) 3-D resistivity inversion using the finite-element method. Geophysics 59(11):1839–1848. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Szalai S, Koppan A, Szokoli K, Szarka L (2013) Geoelectric imaging properties of traditional arrays and of the optimized Stummer configuration. Near Surf Geophys 11. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2012058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Blaschek R, Hördt A, Kemna A (2008) A new sensitivity-controlled focusing regularization scheme for the inversion of induced polarization data based on the minimum gradient support. Geophysics 73(2):F45–F54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Akca I, Basokur AT (2010) Extraction of structure-based geoelectric models by hybrid genetic algorithms. Geophysics 75(1):F15–F22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Attwa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Attwa, M., Ali, H. (2018). Resistivity Characterization of Aquifer in Coastal Semiarid Areas: An Approach for Hydrogeological Evaluation. In: Negm, A. (eds) Groundwater in the Nile Delta . The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 73. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_210

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics