Skip to main content

A quality-based terminological reasoning model for text knowledge acquisition

  • Eliciting Knowledge from Textual and Other Sources
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Knowledge Acquisition (EKAW 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1076))

  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

We introduce a methodology for knowledge acquisition and concept learning from texts that relies upon a quality-based model of terminological reasoning. Concept hypotheses which have been derived in the course of the text understanding process are assigned specific “quality labels” (indicating their significance, reliability, strength). Quality assessment of these hypotheses accounts for conceptual criteria referring to their given knowledge base context as well as linguistic indicators (grammatical constructions, discourse patterns), which led to their generation. We advocate a metareasoning approach which allows for the quality-based evaluation and a bootstrapping-style selection of alternative concept hypotheses as text understanding incrementally proceeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agarwal, R. & M. Tanniru (1991). Knowledge extraction using content analysis. Knowledge Acquisition, 3(4):421–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. & M. Wand (1984). Reification: reflection without metaphysics. In Proc. of the 1984 ACM Symposium on Lisp and Functional Programming, pp. 348–355. Austin, Texas, August 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Y. & S. Salveter (1991). The Automated Knowledge Engineer: natural language knowledge acquisition for expert systems. In Proc. 6th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, pp. 8.1–8.16. Banff, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, F. & C. Segami (1990). Knowledge acquisition from natural language for expert systems based on classification problem-solving methods. Knowledge Acquisition, 2(2):107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U., M. Klenner & K. Schnattinger (1996a). Automatic concept acquisition from real-world texts. In Proc. of the AAAI Spring Symposium on ‘Machine Learning in Information Access'. Stanford, Cal., March 1996. San Mateo, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U., M. Klenner & K. Schnattinger (1996b). Learning from texts: a terminological metareasoning perspective. In S. Wermter, E. Riloff & G. Scheler (Eds.), Connectionist, Statistical and Symbolic Approaches to Learning in Natural Language Processing, pp. 453–468. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U., S. Schacht & N. Bröker (1994). Concurrent, object-oriented dependency parsing: the ParseTalk model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(1–2):179–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa, K. & S. Ishizaki (1989). Acquiring knowledge about a relation between concepts. In EKAW'89 — Proc. Europ. Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, pp. 380–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, P. (1996). Implications of an automatic lexical acquisition system. In S. Wermter, E. Riloff & G. Scheler (Eds.), Connectionist, Statistical and Symbolic Approaches to Learning in Natural Language Processing, pp. 261–274. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, P. & S. Lytinen (1994). The ups and downs of lexical acquisition. In AAAI'94 — Proc. of the 12th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 2, pp. 754–759. Seattle, Wash., July/August 1994. Menlo Park: AAAI Press/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1991). Learning in intelligent information retrieval. In L. Birnbaum & G. Collins (Eds.), Machine Learning: Proc. of the 8th Intl. Workshop, pp. 235–239. Chicago, Ill., June 1991. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, R. (1994). A description classifier for the predicate calculus. In AAAI'94 — Proc. of the 12th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 1, pp. 213–220. Seattle, Wash., July/August 1994. Menlo Park: AAAI Press/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. (1992). Concept-oriented parsing of definitions. In COLING'92 — Proc. 15th Intl. Conf. on Computational Linguistics, pp. 988–992. Nantes, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1993). Notes on formalizing context. In IJCAI'93 — Proc. of the 13th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 1, pp. 555–560. Chambery, France, August/September 1993. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, R. (1987). Integrated learning of words and their underlying concepts. In Proc. of the 9th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 974–978. Seattle, Wash., July 1987. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, U. (1990). Automatic knowledge aquisition from texts: learning terminological knowledge via text understanding and inductive generalization. In Proc. 5th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, pp. 27.1–27.16. Banff, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, P. (1992). A class-based approach to lexical discovery. In Proc. of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 327–329. Newark, Delaware, USA, June/July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. & T. Wetter (1989). Towards knowledge acquisition in natural language dialogue. In EKAW'89 — Proc. Europ. Knowl. Acquisition Workshop, pp. 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnattinger, K. & U. Hahn (1996). A sketch of a qualification calculus. In FLAIRS'96 — Proc. of the 9th Florida AI Research Symposium. Key West, Florida, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnattinger, K., U. Hahn & M. Klenner (1995). Terminological meta-reasoning by reification and multiple contexts. In Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA'95 — Proc. of the 7th Portuguese Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–16. Funchal., Madeira Island, Portugal., October 1995. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekine, S., J. Carroll, S. Ananiadou & J. Tsujii (1992). Automatic learning for semantic collocation. In Proc. of the 3rd Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 104–110. Trento, Italy, March/April 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skuce, D., S. Matwin, B. Tauzovich, F. Oppacher & S. Szpakowicz (1985). A logic-based knowledge source system for natural language documents. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 1(3):201–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M. & U. Hahn (1995). ParseTalk about sentence-and text-level anaphora. In EACL'95 — Proc. of the 7th Conf. of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 237–244. Dublin, Ireland, March 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virkar, R. & J. Roach (1989). Direct assimilation of expert-level knowledge by automatically parsing research paper abstracts. International Journal of Expert Systems 1, 1(4):281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, W. & J. Schmolze (1992). The KL-ONE family. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23(2–5):133–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Nigel Shadbolt Kieron O'Hara Guus Schreiber

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hahn, U., Klenner, M., Schnattinger, K. (1996). A quality-based terminological reasoning model for text knowledge acquisition. In: Shadbolt, N., O'Hara, K., Schreiber, G. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Acquisition. EKAW 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1076. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61273-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61273-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61273-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68391-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics