Skip to main content

Converted Total Least Squares Method and Gauss-Helmert Model with Applications to Coordinate Transformations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 151))

  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, the three kind of solutions of TLS problem, the common solution by singular value decomposition (SVD), the iteration solution and Partial-EIV model are firstly reviewed with respect to their advantages and disadvantages. Then a newly developed Converted Total Least Squares (CTLS) dealing with the errors-in-variables (EIV) model is introduced. The basic idea of CTLS has been proposed by the authors in 2010, which is to take the stochastic design matrix elements as virtual observations, and to transform the TLS problem into a traditional Least Squares problem. This new method has the advantages that it cannot only easily consider the weight of observations and the weight of stochastic design matrix, but also deal with TLS problem without complicated iteration processing, if the suitable approximates of parameters are available, which enriches the TLS algorithm and solves the bottleneck restricting the application of TLS solutions. CTLS method, together with all the three TLS models reviewed here has been successfully integrated in our coordinate transformation programs and verified with the real case study of 6-parameters Affine coordinate transformation. Furthermore, the comparison and connection of this notable CLTS method and estimation of Gauss-Helmert model are also discussed in detail with applications of coordinate transformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adcock RJ (1878) A problem in least squares. Analyst 5:53–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyilmaz O (2007) Total least-squares solution of coordinate transformation. Surv Rev 39(303):68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiri-Simkooeil A, Jazaeri S (2012) Weighted total least squares formulated by standard least squares theory. J Geodetic Sci 2(2):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Grafarend E (2009) Systematical analysis of the transformation between Gauss-Krüger-Coordinate/DHDN and UTM-Coordinate/ETRS89 in Baden-Württemberg with different estimation methods. In: Hermann Drewes (ed) IAG Symposium, vol 134. Geodetic Reference Frame 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong D (2017) Study on the converted Total Least Squares method and its application in coordinate transformation. Bachelor Thesis, University of Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Felus Y, Schaffrin B (2005) Performing similarity transformations using errors-in-variables-model. Proceedings of the ASPRS meeting, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub GH, Van Loan CF (1980) An analysis of the total least squares problem. SIAM J Numer Anal 17(6):883–893, December 1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG, Stuart A (1969) The advanced theory of statistics - Volume 2. Charles Griffin & Co Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch R (2002) Räumliche Helmert-Transformation variabler Koordinaten im Gauß-Helmert und im Gauß-Markov-Modell. ZfV, Zeitschrift für Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement 127:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to points in space. Philos Mag 2:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope A (1972) Some pitfalls to be avoided in the iterative adjustment of nonlinear problems. In: Proceeding of the 38th Annual Meeting American Society of Photogrammetry

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B (2003) A note on constrained Total Least-Squares estimation. In: Computational statistics and data analysis, eingereicht Oct 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B (2005) Generalizing the Total Least-Squares estimator for empirical coordinate transformation, lecture in Geodetic Institute. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Felus Y (2005) On total least-squares adjustment with constraints, In: Sansò F. (ed) A window on the future of geodesy. International association of geodesy symposia, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Felus Y (2008) Multivariate total least squares adjustment for empirical affine transformations. In: Xu P, Liu J, Dermanis A (eds) International association of geodesy symposia: VI Hotine-Marussi symposium on the theoretical and computational geodesy, 29 May-2 June 2006,Wuhan, China, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, pp 238–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Wieser A (2008) On weighted Total Least Squares for linear regression. J Geod 82:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Li B, Chen Y (2011) An iterative solution of weighted total least squares adjustment. J Geod 85:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Huffel S, Lemmerling P (eds) (2002) Total least squares and errors-in-variables modeling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Huffel S, Vandewalle J (1991) The Total Least Squares problem computational aspects and analysis. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Huffel S, Zha H (1993) The Total Least-Squares problem. In: Rao CR (ed) Handbook of statistics: computational statistics, vol 9. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 377–408

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Li J, Liu C (2016) A robust weighted total least squares algorithm and its geodetic applications. Stud Geophys Geod 60(2016):180–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf H (1978) Das geodätische Gauß-Helmert-Modell und seine Eigenschaften. zfv 103:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Liu J, Shi C (2012) Total least squares adjustment in partial errors-in-variables models: algorithm and statistical analysis. J Geod 86:661–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Kong J, Cai J, Sneeuw N (2010) New method for Total Least Squares: the combination LS solution considering the random errors of design matrix, internal research report. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for his many constructive comments, which helped to clarify a number of points in the revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianqing Cai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cai, J., Dong, D., Sneeuw, N., Yao, Y. (2020). Converted Total Least Squares Method and Gauss-Helmert Model with Applications to Coordinate Transformations. In: Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sneeuw, N., Sansò, F. (eds) IX Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 151. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_116

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics